BREAKING: Bill Barr to release report in 30 min.

Dems are already whining about a 'cover up'. Nothing short of Mueller perp walking Trump out of the Oval Office would have satisfied them. Now the 'vast right wing conspiracy' begins again...

 

We have one in the OP as well. And @US Conservative supplied it.

 

Read the last sentence of the first paragraph under "Obstruction of Justice" on page 3. What does it say?
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/d... to House and Senate Judiciary Committees.pdf

 

I bet sock sales are good today

 

The report doesn't, but Rosenstein/Barr do. I'm going to trust our law enforcement people considering that everyone hates Donald Trump. If they could nail him, they would. But they didn't.

 

Just yesterday said Mueller was an American hero

 

No collusion, no obstruction....countdown to dems throwing Mueller under the bus has begun!

 

Hell . . . I know a few of their political ally RINO fanatical haters of all things Trump in nature on this forums system who should probably be monitored in a friendly manner for . . . severe depression.

 

Johnny, it's over.

 

The investigation shouldn't have happened to begin with. It started due to false and fraudulent information from members of the UK(Australia and Britain.) I suspect we will learn a lot more about Operation Crossfire Hurricane in the coming months.

Now it's their turn to be under investigation.

 

A lot of people have been red pilled over this.

Its been shoved in our face for 2 years.

I wouldn't count this out as being a factor in november 2020.

 

Just on the matter of obstruction and while saying they did not find an obstruction they would leave it to the AG and DAG to make the final determination and they were quite clear, no obstruction of justice. He has been exonerated.

 

cant prove intent there for no crime

yes the same excuse used not to prosecute Clinton that you readily accepted

 

Not only will these radical, scum-sucking Democrat pigs not "remember who told you", they're already planning to subpoena Robert Mueller and give him the INQUISTION treatment to make him tell them how he could DARE to bring forth a finding that did NOT indict President Trump!

Ooh! They must be thrashing around on the floor with their eyes bugged-out and froth coming out of their mouths by this time!

. "Get Mueller's treasonous ass in here! This was NOT what we bought the "Steele Dossier" for!"

 

Of course she knew. Remember how many Dem Party loyalists were on Mueller's team. Privately the beans were spilled at least a couple of weeks ago.

 

obstruction requires intent no evidence of intent no crime

the same excuse used not to prosecute Clinton that you readily accepted

 

Read the first paragraph under "Obstruction of Justice" on page 3. What does it say?
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/d... to House and Senate Judiciary Committees.pdf

Prove it doesn't say....

The Special Counsel determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgement. The Special Counsel therefore did not draw conclusions - one way or the other - as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.
The Special Counsel states that "while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

 

said yesterday that Mueller was an American hero.

2020 will be subjected to having their Mueller investigation sound bites used against them.

 

They do it exactly like Americans do. If you are dumb enough to get your news from Facebook then you are already a lost cause.

 

Dem Rep.Cohen was just on MSNBC smearing Bill Barr.

 

No it doesn't. The only mention of exoneration has to do with obstruction and all it says that the fact we found nothing to do with obstruction we leave it up to the AG and DAG who then exonerated Trump. Has nothing to do with the exoneration on collusion.

 

Even were we not to be privy the content of this synoptic disclosure, doesn't the Fri. afternoon 'Mueller dump' tell us something, lol!

 

Sez you.

Read the first paragraph under "Obstruction of Justice" on page 3. What does it say?
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/d... to House and Senate Judiciary Committees.pdf

Prove it doesn't say....

The Special Counsel determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgement. The Special Counsel therefore did not draw conclusions - one way or the other - as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.
The Special Counsel states that "while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

 

You would thing so but remember how the polling companies and MSM -- both entities pretty much openly working for the DNC nowadays -- work, in that whatever clown eventually gets GIVEN the nomination by the corrupt to the core DNC he or she will instantly be at least 14 polling points ahead of Trump and remain in that position while being praised to the skies by the MSM until only a few days before the election when once again -- mysteriously -- the polls will embrace something resembling actual reality. Thus once again huge numbers of blindly believing leftists will be shocked when Trump re-wins the presidency.

 

Barr's statement specifically says the Mueller report "does not exonerate him". You should check your sources more carefully.