BREAKING: Robert Mueller is speaking right now, for the first time since the report was released

LOL that's the point you have the ability get off your asses and do it already since your so convinced, why the heck we still talking about it? Once you do your party will be judged in 2020 good or bad. Why your stuck on 2018 bewilders me, it's now about 2020 that matters not last year.

 

17 investigations into Trump. 10 into Hillary. Sure, and you ask for oversight.

 

IN FACT, the House of Representatives always has the ability to impeach ANY sitting president for ANY reason it likes -- all it takes is a simple majority vote to do so!

The House can impeach a president for lying to Congress under oath -- which is why they impeached Bill Clinton. But, they could impeach Donald Trump for leaving a bag of popcorn in the microwave too long -- it's all up to their own whims and NOTHING else.

Ah, but in the Senate things are quite (QUITE) different. In the Senate, there's a trial, with the presentation of evidence, proof, and testimony under oath. And, then there must be a vote to remove a president from office.

The House will probably vote to impeach Donald Trump, but unless there's some new earth-shaking revelation based in TRUTH, with EVIDENCE, and PROOF, there's not a chance in hell that the Senate will vote to remove him from office....

 

All the Trump Justice Department Special Counsel did was reconfirm and emphasize the purpose of his appointment 'to serve as Special Counsel to oversee the previously-confirmed FBI investigation of Russian government efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election and related matters."

While he repeated that his report did not exonerate Trump, he re-affirmed that he was prevented from indicting him while in office.

His investigation exposed what is in his report, and it was not within his purview under Trump Justice Department rules to take any legal action against Trump.

I hope that Congress fulfills its responsibility to take it from there, and hope that its pursuit of the truth will keep it busy through November, 2020.

 

Wow... you are whiffing all over the place... Had you read Section E, you would have known Rosenstein stated no conflict of interest in 2017, in addition to the unconnected 2018 article you are pulling out...

 

If that were true then when it didn't happen he would have found someone that would or could've fired Mules, if they didn't do it he would have replaced them with someone that would. Bottom line he must not have wanted to fire him or it would've happened. Attempted firing is the dumbest thing I've heard in a long time.

 

Numerous investigations into Al Capone, none into Mr Rogers.

Zero indictments of Clinton as a result of all those investigations. Trump's: pending.

 

Unfortunately (for you), that's not what the law on OOJ says....

And bringing up Hillary isn't winning you any points.... I certainly won't comment on that...

 

AG Barr spoke directly to the directive given to McGahn. Trump told McGahn to tell Rosenstein the president wanted to review the conflicts Trump raised, and replace Mueller if warranted. That's not illicit activity. Rosenstein apparently did review the conflicts after Trump's tweet storm, and testified he found no disqualifying conflicts for Mueller. That was the extent of the supposed obstruction.

 

Well, we'd know how Trump responded to McGahns refusals had he answered any questions from Mueller on the situation...

But the fact that he tried to get McGahn to lie about the whole thing 6 months later don't look too good....

 

He hasn’t been impeached so nobody says he’s a witch.
Lock her up, that was a witch hunt.

 

Except she was exonerated and he specifically was NOT.

 

3 days AFTER Rosenstein testified there were no conflicts to Congress... your timeline is off...

 

bs, trump and his team lied from day one about russian involvement !!!

 

Those are not facts, the only fact is that Mueller did not get fired which kills your argument. Fact is the house can impeach so do it, and the last Fact is the American people will decide in 2020 if your could've, didn't but means he did argument works.

 

there were 10 for benghazi alone.

 

Do you mean Obama, he's the one that addressed the public on Russian election interference before the election?

 

What? You're citing the same Rosenstein testimony that I am. Once Rosenstein got Trump's message about wanting Mueller removed for conflict, despite McGahn's refusal to be the messenger, Rosenstein determined there was no disqualifying conflicts. All you've done is solidify my assertion.

 

And what lie did Obama tell about Russian meddling?

 

... please

 

McGahn obstructing Trump...riiight

Did you know that the Mueller report explicitly noted that Trump's efforts to obstruct the investigation were largely unsuccessful specifically because his subordinates refused to carry out his orders?

 

And the best way to ensure that 2020 return results that are even better than those in 2018 is to slow roll the investigations, many of which extend far beyond the confines of Mueller's investigation, until that time.

Not to start impeachment proceedings right away.

Consider this: Pelosi is actively playing Trump into doing more and more dumb **** by slow rolling the impeachment and noting that Trump is actively encouraging impeachment.

 

No... your Hill article is from Rod testifying to Congress in 2018.... you can normally tell from the date of the article, but it also mentions the IG report...

Section E is from June 2017.... and the timeframe, per the report, is indisputable...

Rod testified to the same question twice it would seem... and the answer was the same in 2018 as it was in 2017.

 

...What did you think to prove with this post?

 

dear god please run on that. Trump couldn't fire him because his subordinates wouldn't pull the trigger. Yeap American the Your Fired President wasn't allowed to fire Mules because his subordinates disobeyed him. You guys will literally get laughed out of office.