He's right, though. If Obama gave no thought to the upcoming election, he'd fare far better in it. He'll still win against Romney.
changed his tune a bit it seems [video=youtube;OzkyQT56Cz4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzkyQT56Cz4[/video]
As usual Damon, the man who can't even grow a beard and was the literal boy genuius in - Good Will Hunting - {1997} speaks as if some male crystal ball reader. O h... To get a true glimpse inside the head of a Hollywood Spin doctor wannabee. No thanks... the guys not that interesting even though in his mind he's the last word. With Damon it's all about Attitude. Need I say more.
can't rep ya but thanks for the best laugh I had all day LOL anyway, looks like the guilt ridden rich white eco libs are jumping ship early
I don't know why this is news. Is it news that I'm not voting for Obama? No. It shouldn't be news that he's not. In fact, it shouldn't matter to anyone who anyone votes for. The fact that it does is part of the problem.
Matt Damon's opinion means less to me than Rosie's. Besides, all I can think of is this when I read his name: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QApeYpw7KQQ
Uhh psst. There were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq after all. The massive cache of almost 400,000 Iraq war documents released by the WikiLeaks Web site revealed that small amounts of chemical weapons were found in Iraq and continued to surface for years after the 2003 US invasion, Wired magazine reported. The documents showed that US troops continued to find chemical weapons and labs for years after the invasion, including remnants of Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons arsenal -- most of which had been destroyed following the Gulf War. Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/us_did_find_iraq_wmd_AYiLgNbw7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM#ixzz1sosi0yQo Wrong again as usual. Besides, if your loyality is so cheap thats all it took to change your complete political philosophy then stay over there. Liberals love wishy washy.
Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001 "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002 "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 http://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm
Just a few points... These celebutards should know their place. They exist only to entertain us with their out-of-control decadent antics. Any opinions expressed by these tinsel-headed morons should be treated with derision. If Damon really wants to redistribute income he can start with his own. Marxists often are happy to embrace the wealthy. Not a few spoiled rich kids play at being Marxist. Communist governments intertwine with big corporations. Obama, who is loaded with far left connections, eagerly serves the big banks who've bribed him. And examine the career of this guy: DOSSIER: THE SECRET HISTORY OF ARMAND HAMMER
Which is of course exactly why they are doing it....for themselves. They are FINALLY starting to understand that only 20% of he population agrees with their far left radical bull(*)(*)(*)(*), and 20% doesn't pay the bills....just ask Oprah. They have to use the old...."Obama didn't get anything done". Which instead really means "holy (*)(*)(*)(*), the country really is in the toilet because of these fools". Oh Yeah, and of course...."you mean I'm part of the 1% and I am going to be required to support everyone else?" "But, I thought I was excluded?" "Oh well, I guess I just won't pay my taxes then" F'n liberal Hollywood hypocrite's! I can't stand them! And it seems to me that the more they talk, the more their carrers end up in toilet. Good.
People who "renounce their conservatism" do not end up becoming a complete liberal progressive radical's, such as yourself. Admit the lie....you were absolutely never even remotely conservative.