Cell phone records appear to show more perjury from Fani Willis and Nathan Wade

Show us an actual crime he committed.

 

No and neither is Agent I Did The Crimes For Myself Oranges.

Trial WBK, don't be skeered like Trump to face a jury.

 

If Willis isn't above the law, then she should face the consequences.

 

Who says different? That a strawman reach. Regardless, WBK, it won't stop only DELAY the Trump RICO trial.

 

If Fatty is DQ'ed, the RICO trial will definitely be delayed.

 

So justice delayed for Crimin' Donnie works for you then?

 

The only delay in justice is that Willis hasn't been DQ'ed already.

Justice goes both ways, ya know?

 

It very likely will stop the trial from occurring because a new prosecutor is not likely to follow through on such specious charges. Even if he were found guilty those would never hold up upon appeal. The next prosecutor would not have campaigned on getting Trump and theoretically would not be ethically compromised like Fani Willis. With that being the case, the odds of that case moving forward at that point would be very low. You just don't find that type of corruption behind every corner.

 

It very likely will stop the trial from occurring because a new prosecutor is not likely to follow through on such specious charges. Even if he were found guilty those would never hold up upon appeal. The next prosecutor would not have campaigned on getting Trump and theoretically would not be ethically compromised like Fani Willis. With that being the case, the odds of that case moving forward at that point would be very low. You just don't find that type of corruption behind every corner.

 

Ironic post but you keep avoiding acknowledging you desperately want Agent Oranges to skate, why?

 

We shall see but that's a lot of steps being jumped by you. And, most importantly, doesn't get Trump off the hook. The poster boy of corruption is the one that's going to stand trial in the RICO case.

 

He won't be "skating" because he didn't commit a crime.

 

Its no more steps by me than it is from you when you state that removing her will only delay the trial as opposed to stopping it.

The given context already assumes she is being removed, and then from there you are predicting the next step just like me. The general mindset is that another prosecutor would not take up such specious charges.

A RICO charge for a sitting president strategizing with his employees? Cmon. That is as ridiculous as it gets. Such a scheme is the domain of a crooked prosecutor concerned only with making a name for themself as opposed to pursuing justice.

 

Here is the evidence of his actual crimes in GA. https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2023/08/CRIMINAL-INDICTMENT-Trump-Fulton-County-GA.pdf

I find the evidence to be compelling. So did a grand jury. Yet you folks dismiss the evidence while proclaiming Willis guilty of felonies she has not even been charged for. Double standard much?

 

I don't think you have an actual point to make, the RICO case will proceed. As for specious charges, that your hyper partisan opine since Trump did all of these things for himself and a Grand Jury has found he needs to stand trial for it. What's your issue with those ACTUAL FACTS and him having his day in court?

 

That's up to a jury of his peers , why fear it then?

 

It's a kangaroo court.

 

Of course you find the evidence (not proof) compelling. You hate Trump so much, you'll go along with anything your dear leader say.

 

One would think that if you’re going after a dog as big as Trump you would have someone clean do it. This was a horrid move

 

That's the over used, never proven, assertion we hear every time the legal system seeks to hold Trump accountable for his alleged crimes.

 

The thing about that infamous trump call to Ukraine is that it was never a secret. Multiple people were in on that call and it was fully recorded. The transcripts don't show trump saying anything that presidents in the past have done/said.

Especially bidens conversation in Ukraine that was nothing but extortion. Compare bidens version of the conversation with the transcript from trumps call.

What a democrat does is politics
What a republican does is criminal

 

It's amazing to me that people still don't know the history of the Flynn situation. Here's the story.

New cabinet members of the transition team have routine interviews with the FBI after their candidate wins the election and before the date of the inauguration. Flynn had his interview, and they found nothing wrong with him moving forward. Then, some rogue FBI agents with an axe to grind realized they forgot to close out the interview in their internal system about a month later and openly decided (we have the message) that they wanted to get him fired or imprisoned despite knowing he had done nothing wrong. So they reached out to him and kindly told him they forgot to close out the interview, it's just routine, he didn't need an attorney, and they just wanted a short time with him to close it out officially. When they met with him, they read a copy of the transcript from their previous interview and asked if that was accurate, but they never gave him a copy. Flynn responded with something like, "If that's what it says." But, the agents lied. It wasn't what the transcript said, and they told him they were going to prosecute him and if he took a plea bargain for probation, they wouldn't do a similar thing to his son. This was their way of getting him fired.

But then the judge went rogue, accused him of treason, and said he would throw the book at him and he wouldn't get probation like the rogue agents said. So, he changed his plea to not guilty. The internal notes of the FBI agents saying they would lie to him to get him fired came out publicly, and the DOJ wanted to drop the charges. But the judge went rogue again and wanted to prosecute him for perjury, saying he initially pleaded guilty and changing his plea was a crime (it's not). He found a wacky moron off the opinion pages of one of his favorite left-leaning media outlets to prosecute the case on behalf of the DOJ, but the appellate courts told him that was illegal. So, he was forced to drop the charges.

Everyone hears about the first part, where the rogue agents said Flynn lied to the FBI and he would take a plea. But nobody followed up to see how it ended. He was exonerated. Flynn is an example of an actual perjury trap that you mentioned before.

 

Agent Orange is a kangaroo?

 

It's amazing to me how people hate due process when their political adversaries are involved. It's not "justice" to violate a defendants rights in the process to get a fast guilty verdict that wouldn't be likely to hold up on appeal. This isn't Soviet Russia, sorry.

 

Happy to amaze a hyper partisan. America has a rule of law, embrace it.