Chemical Gas Attack Appears Staged-fake

Nah, I am not going to bother. Just go ahead and keep ignoring facts. You are doing a fine job of that.

 

Alright, and you just keep posting utterly unsubstantiated BS - you're doing a fine job of that.

 

According to Jerry Smith, the leader of the UN-backed operation that removed the Syrian government's chemical weapons stockpiles, "if it is Sarin that was stored there and conventional munitions were used, there is every possibility that some of those [chemical] munitions were not consumed and that the Sarin liquid was ejected and could well have affected the population."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khan_Shaykhun_chemical_attack#Syrian_government_claims

Seriously, dude. Can you at least ditch the Shinning Armor? How can one have so little capacity for self-reflection?

The rebels and ISIL also have used chem weapons in the past. It is entirely possible that some were stored there or elsewhere. This is going way too fast, and it makes me uncomfortable.

There's many things we don't know yet. Maybe you are right and I am wrong, but right now it's still a gamble, in any way.

 

Nah, it is substantiated facts the sane population knows are true.

 

Considering it was fixed wing aircraft that dropped the bombs it had to be Syria.

 

Assad got his chemical weapons from the Saddam Hussein stockpile.
The reports of a truck convoy going to Syria at the start of the war are the best evidence.
The MSM refuse to even acknowledge the original reports.
Dead giveaway.
You need to develop some critical thinking skills.

 

Looks like a cover sheet. Where's the rest of the document???

 

Assad was preparing for the eventuality that his father would be deposed.
Nice try but it doesn't wash.
Strawman burning is a specialty of mine.
You don't get to keep them long here.

 

“The use [of chemical weapons] itself is not in any way surprising, given that he did it in 2013 and, on a lower scale, many times since. The issue that we are grappling with is scale and timing [of the attack].”

Since the 2013 sarin attack on a Damascus suburb, there have been government attacks using chlorine gas which have brought almost no repercussions. Sarin is much deadlier, and its use easier to prove through testing, making it a more powerful but riskier form of chemical weapon.

In rebel-held parts of Syria, the attack was met with relief that it might mark an end to chemical attacks, but little hope that it would bring an end to death or suffering.

“I am reading now that this strike is to make Assad not use chemical weapons any more,” said activist Abdulkafi al Hamdo.

The message from that, he said, was that the government could “go ahead with using barrel bombs, vacuum rockets, cluster bombs, phosphorus weapons and any kind, just not chemical weapons”.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/07/syria-nerve-agent-attack-why-it-made-sense-to-assad

 

Bashar was NOT the son designated to take over from Hafez the father. That brother a playboy/drinker/car racer was killed. The next brother was mentally ill.. Assad became the dictator by default, but Maher his younger brother controls the military and police.

 

And yet look who is in charge.
A strawman is still a strawman.
He was prepared to become a dictator if called upon by his family.

 

I have no idea what Bashar thought.. but he appears to be a very passive person.. like he's stoned or on valium.

 

Yeah just watched the video. NO WAY that guy injecting "adrenaline" aka epinephrine has done that before. He's not appropriately aspirating the syringe and most importantly, you're taught first thing, if you have to redirect the needle you pull back out to skin. It's way more likely his redirection of that needle that's hubbed (in as far as it goes) flayed a bunch of vessels and the heart itself. That act alone probably would have killed that child. And also the kids heart is more superficial than that. Wow that was atrocious.

Credentials - current practicing anesthetist, specialities cardiothoracic and trauma anesthesia.

It's difficult to know these days what's true and what's not. The CIA has all these under the table projects. Difficult to know who really did that attack. It doesn't make any sense it was Assad.

 

Okay, thanks for confirming you are a covert agent sent to foul cognition of Americans seeking to defend and enforce the constitution.

 

Thank you Mackithius! Your independent medical analysis of the injection procedure is very welcomed and needed!

 

Right here. All evidence is hyperlinked.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.disclosure.html

 

Where is your link to the Swedish organization stating such denial?

 

Two commas were left out as I was on a phone posting. That hardly dictates it makes no sense, it indicates you are being selective which is a tactic of covert infiltration.

I do have evidence that agents working for foreign governments are sending covert agents into American web forums.

http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/sunstein_2/

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/snowden_cyber_offensive2_nbc_document.pdf

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE95K0ZV20130621?irpc=932
"For decades, the NSA and GCHQ have worked as close partners, sharing intelligence under an arrangement known as the UKUSA agreement. They also collaborate with eavesdropping agencies in Canada, Australia and New Zealand under an arrangement known as the "Five Eyes" alliance."

Are you in a commonwealth country?

 

If you were really a fan of the Constitution you would use a capital "C"..... thanks commie!

 

He is repeating, I think, what medical doctors have said. You can open source it if you tend to not believe it. But you know some people who might listen to what doctors said, would find some way to dismiss it, for their beliefs are set, and even facts, evidence will of course have to be dismissed. You see it on the forum perhaps daily. And on every other political forum. If not for the existence of such denial it would be hard to remain in one of the tribes who maintain their membership by pure lies and deceit. It really is a prerequisite for staying in either of the two big tribes, right? So, these two tribes represent the dishonest people in America. At the end of the day. Reality is one helluva bi-otch. And it reveals the total loss of a moral compass, and character. Which then is reflected in a most destructive and vulgar culture. Ah, the interrelationship and interdependence of all things.

 

I am not repeating what anyone said. That's my take on the injection. That wasn't a professional, it was terrible technique. And the site wasn't even prepped.

I understand internet credentials are tough to believe. The reason I explained it is so that the merits of my post can be dissected and understood. Not just a simple "trust me I'm a doctor." My aforementioned analysis basically says, I have a high suspicion the person injecting the needle was not medically trained. An actor? Who knows.... it certainly wasn't anyone medically trained.

If you'd like further validation, I'd be happy to but my knowledge where my mouth is, test me if you want. I didn't think merits would be brought up. Intracardiac injection is a simple procedure, should be easily understood.

 

As George Orwell noted, in a time of universal deception, speaking the truth is a radical act.

This is a time of universal deception, fake news etc. The gas story is a false flag deception, and POTUS proved that by using military aggression, text book False Flag.

You have spoken the truth, and therefore you will be portrayed by government apologists as being a radical.

Thanks for speaking out.

 

Bwah hahahahaha. Do you know how many times a day I write "constitution"? I only use the Capital when in conjunction with other titles that are typically capitalized.

If you are really a supporter of the constitution and its intent with its rights, you will answer both of these inquires with yes, accepting their definitions of prime constitutional intent.

--As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree and accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent and right that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to the ideal of our unalienable rights?

As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree, accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent and right that the ultimate purpose of free speech be to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish government destructive to the ideal of our unalienable rights?--

 

I completely understood the fact that the needle is withdrawn and reinserted to avoid tearing any vital tissues. Makes complete sense. If I'm not mistaken, in the context of one minds post, the word "verifying" could replace "repeating" and more accurately reflect what you intended.