Chemical Gas Attack Appears Staged-fake

so they couldn't tell ?

 

bombs fell, but what kind of bombs and what did they hit ?

 

Critical thinking requires actual information, MSM doesn't provide that. It provides sound bites and perspective.

The "minimization" of the application of critical thinking about video documentation analyzed by teams of independent physicians by "labeling" reaction as "emotional problems" is a cognitive distortion and your use of such tactic is noted critically as the kind of tactic that cover agents of infiltration use. The label of "conspiracy theory" is a minimizing tactic of covert cognitive infiltration.

You've just exposed your agenda.

 

Is this the bit where you start accusing people of being secret agents because that's actually quite funny?

 

Exactly!

There are many more accounts that support that Mossad and CIA created isis.

http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/top-10-proofs-isis-us-israeli-creation/

 

Anyone that is seriously deceived and adverse to critical thinking, because of the cognitive dissonance it causes, which your post supports.

 

Putin often gets outmaneuvered by the sophisticated US propaganda machine that is truly unmatched.

 

Well get to laughing then because you post EXACTLY as a cognitive infiltrator would. And it would be expected such agents would target a thread like this. Wala! Here ya'll are.

 

Right so if someone like me decides to point out that you consistently accuse people of being one thing or another after being faced with an opposing view then I must be the very thing that you accuse others of.
You do see the problem with this don't you? I mean with that logic I could quite easily say that you're actually a space alien.

 

Your posting in the way you are in the presence of unbiased expertise of independent Swedish doctors proves my point.

You are either an agent or a person afflicted with group think that is deeply erroneous and afraid to correct.

http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/sunstein_2/

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/snowden_cyber_offensive2_nbc_document.pdf

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE95K0ZV20130621?irpc=932
"For decades, the NSA and GCHQ have worked as close partners, sharing
intelligence under an arrangement known as the UKUSA agreement. They
also collaborate with eavesdropping agencies in Canada, Australia and
New Zealand under an arrangement known as the "Five Eyes" alliance."

Prove you are neither by agreeing with and accepting these two inquiries completely based in the most prime intent of Americas framing documents.

--As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree and accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent and right that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to the ideal of our unalienable rights?

As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree, accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent and right that the ultimate purpose of free speech be to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish government destructive to the ideal of our unalienable rights?--

What shall it be?

 

What does that mean in English because that sentence makes no sense?

See you're doing it again

Ah I remember this bit. Unless its the answer you have in your head then it must mean that I'm part of something out of the x-files.

Gammon and Spinach!

 

It's an old Swedish proverb;
' Unbiased Swedish doctors of independent expertise will prove another's point if you post in their presence ' Ya.

 

Can I borrow your tinfoil hat?

 

Meanwhile, RT is claiming that "Villagers were the majority of victims of the US strike on the Shayrat Airbase on April 6, portrayed as retaliation against the Bashar Assad government, according to the governor of Homs Talal al-Barazi. A total of 14 people including nine innocent civilians were killed in the US missile attack."

https://www.rt.com/news/384144-syria-village-tomahawks-strike-aftermath/

No accusation of "fake" is made in these claims. Just that the US mostly killed innocent villagers, a claim allegedly based on what "the governor of Homs Talal al-Barazi" has said.

 

Ah ha! The final tactic of the cognitive infiltrator, pretend you do not understand.

Uh huh, nonsense and failure to even acknowledge the most prime rights of America. Absolutely consistent with cognitive infiltration.

Tell us what great compromise do you suffer by refusing to acknowledge the most prime rights and intents of the framing documents of America?

--As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree and accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent and right that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to the ideal of our unalienable rights?

As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree, accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent and right that the ultimate purpose of free speech be to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish government destructive to the ideal of our unalienable rights?--

C'mon now, if you are a real and sincere American you can accept these definitions of our most prime rights, I mean it's fundamental to the 9th amendment to do so.

 

What, you can't do critical
Thinking? It's not cognitive dissonance for you, you hate the rights and freedoms conferred by the American constitution.

Here, I'll have you prove it again. Please show us you are a sincere American that agrees with and accepts the most prime constitutional intent.

--As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree and accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent and right that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to the ideal of our unalienable rights?

As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree, accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent and right that the ultimate purpose of free speech be to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish government destructive to the ideal of our unalienable rights?--

It's easy, painless while protecting our rights and freedoms. Simply agree and accept the intents of the American framing documents.

 

Guided missiles weren't they? And they hit an airfield in Syria?

 

I guess next you will ask me to accept Jesus as my personal savior.... sorry, I do not believe in dogmatic indoctrination.

We have laws. We have the Constitution. Perhaps you believe some laws are unconstitutional but too bad. It is what it is.

 

Total BS of course:

The Swedish organization denies ever saying such a thing and denies everything claimed there.


Why do people so easily believe in such nonsense?

 

No it really isn't nor does it make sense in English.

 

No I don't understand because what you've written doesn't make any sense.

Have you ever read David Copperfield?

You do realise that this is an international forum?

 

So confident an assertion is usually accompanied by a source link so can you provide one please?

 

He probably doesn't know it. This is neuro-linguistic programming in action, and it works like this - 'Make the lie big and keep repeating and repeating it, and sooner rather than later the suckers will believe it.'

 

Hahaha! I have already provided a link with pics and still the conspiracy theorists ignore them.

 

Why can't you just repeat it then, to save me trawling back through 224 posts to find it?