CNN Analyst Says ‘Women’s March Isn’t About Women, It’s About Liberalism’

How hasn't someone arrested (or offed) this guy already?

 

At least they were peaceful which is unusual for liberals

 

Looking at those signs, they make no sense.

 

Sure, you got that, but you also have that liberalism spoken of as some sort of inconsistent, incoherent, mush, which doesn't resemble liberalism. They hijacked that term just a surely as homosexuals hijacked the term gay. And gay was such a nice word, signifying a care free happiness. And now we no longer have such a nice short word to denote this common state of mind. And so the left today call themselves liberals but they have as much in common with 20th century liberalism as a dog and a cat. For liberalism today is a combination of SJW on the one hand but economically they are to the far right embracing neoliberalism, and to the right embracing war mongering neocon American capitalist hegemony. This is what modern liberalism is. Incoherent.

 

One of the organizers is an active proponent of Sharia Law. She organized a group of women to march in hijab. Freaking stupid.

 

Remember the line from the old song that goes something like: your lips are telling me no, but your eyes are saying yes, yes, yes.
Women talk in code. I've given up trying to make sense of what they say.

 

Perhaps some people will even set themselves ablaze, in "protest."

Please don't misunderstand me: There are some causes--real causes--for which that form of self-sacrifice is a sort of heroism, I believe.

But the fact that one simply does not like the outcome of an election is not a true cause. It is more like a temper tantrum.

 

I'm thinking that he owns enough RINO senators that they are making certain that Soros never gets what's coming to him.

 

Oh aye. It's like Joseph Stalin purportedly said about the leftists who put Lenin and then himself into power. "Useful idiots who are always the first ones after the revolution that we stand against a wall and shoot." Leftists for Sharia Law are simply insane. Well, nation-haters of course, but primarily just insane.

 

And of course, they are filthy littering pigs: Liberal Women March Against Trump – Then Leave Trash Heaps for Someone Else to Clean Up

 

Damn! That is stupid!

Reminds me of an old 3 Stooges clip where Moe calls Curly an imbecile. Curly looks offended and replies, "I'm not an imbecile!"

Then Curly stands straight, puffs his chest a bit and adds, "I'm a moron!"

 

Well naturally. These are after all leftists well enough off to travel across the nation and waste time over nonsense and so they leave clean up to the peasants, because to elitist style leftists, that's what peasants are for.

 

And where was the MSM with the crap pile they left behind?

 

Maybe you need to do some research into countries where they don't have something like Roe v. Wade.

I give you, the Philippines. Abortion is illegal except to save the mother's life. Yet it is estimated that 500-800 thousand abortions are performed in the Philippines every year. About 4000 women a year are injured in botched abortions.

Another worse example. In 1967, the crazy communist dictator of Romania decided he wanted to double the country's population, so he outlawed abortion and birth control. And that worked, for about a year, until women found ways around the law. In `1989, they rose up against the dictator and shot him...

 

This just shows how libs do not respect women.

 

How sad women are marching for the right to kill their own children.

 

So 500-800 thousand murders compared to 4000 injured.
Babies are losing the battle, big time.

 

It's just another sore loser temper tantrum disguised as something bigger

 

I'll at least give Sellers credit for stating the obvious. It's great when "liberalism" takes ownership of an event led by hate filled, "F" bomb throwing, crotch grabbing angry speakers.

 

Anytime that someone begins with sarcasm, it is probably a pretty good bet that he is nothing more than a troll.

Nonetheless, I will respond, in the hope that you might actually be the exception.

These are, no doubt, the "back-alley" abortions to which I referred earlier.

But this is certainly not the only alternative to legal abortions.

Have you ever considered the possibility of adoption?

 

They aren't really dangerous, unless you're a tissue. All they do is whine and cry and burn down their own stuff. Its hard to be dangerous when you have to go back to mommy and daddy's basement when the protesting is done...

 

Um... did you miss how half the country completely lost its mind when the black guy got elected in 2009?

 

I don't have to worry about that, because i don't have a uterus... but to the point, before we had family planning, there were lots of children and no one to adopt them, which is why we had orphanages.

The thing is, what you anti-choice sorts don't get is that there were just as many abortions happening before Roe v. Wade as there were afterwards. The birth rate did not drop in 1973 or 1974 and it actually started climbing in 1975. (It did drop considerably after birth control pills were introduced in 1965, and that's when the orphanages outlived their usefulness.) Doctors were performing abortions, writing down something else on the charts, and unless there was a serious medical complication, everyone went on their way.

Which is probably what's going to happen if you get Roe overturned...

 

Fetuses were never going to win that battle.

Now, if the anti-abortion side was truly serious about there wanting to be less abortions, they could support paid medical and family leave, universal health care and comprehensive sex and contraception education. But this never really was about the fetuses.

 

Why is it always someone else's responsibility? The pro murder crowd should be taught at a young age the responsibility of having sex. Teach abstinence in our schools and homes.