Colorado: more voters than people? Hmmm

Just face it you just lost that debate. I have proven my point. You need to move on.

 

1,859,940 number of votes if 10 fraudulent votes per precinct.

3,790,880 number of votes if 20 fraudulent votes per precinct.

3,202,936 is how many votes Obama won by. The rest of the math is easy.

 

The fact that you feel like you have to delcare yourself the winner in this debate (over what, exactly?) tells me you realize yourself
you've slipped and fallen down on a pile of dog doo.

Try again some other time. I have to go out now.

 

Oh I see you are just upset now. I will tell you over what, I made a statement about the elections in Florida in 2000 and you tried to disprove it and I presented proof of it in a court case that Florida state lost and had to comply with where they admitted taking people of the voter register before the 2000 elections.

 

Its very easily possible!

You don't know WHAT you are reading.

That column is NOT "voters", its "CARDS". (Look at the column heading). The election issues were long enough to required TWO CARDS PER VOTER!

What a FAIL! When the Right wants to look stupid, they don't think small! Do you really think an election system could be reporting MORE VOTERS than REGISTRATIONS without some kind of news splash?



*

 

This is assuming that people stay in their location for a lifetime.

 

Oops . . . my bad. I misread the original post.


Counties such as Gilpin and Hinsdale have 110 percent of their populations registered to vote


Which would logically be explained by your other post.

But the third column in this PDF seems odd, don't you think?
http://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/Ward and Precinct Report - unofficial_tcm3-34634.pdf

 

What is the unemployment rate again, 7.9%, nowhere near the majority of Americans. What are the free handoust they are waiting on?

 

The "Food Stamp" President!

 

That figure is way off as it is done by a liberal media....You need to consult the Rassmussen-Dick Morris-Susquehanna-Tribune polls which estimate that at least 47%, and much likely more of all Americans are welfare mooches and that Romney actually won the election....

 

WRONG.

The report was that 99.5, a statistical impossibility voted for Barack Obama. They didn't even try to cover it up.

Also, that is NOT THE POINT. The point is that over 140% of the voters voted which is also a statistical impossibility.

In the city of Philadelphia in the black first 30 wards, they absolutely committed voter fraud by all mathematical measures.

 

This is the 3rd time I have shared the link. Read the 3rd column and you lose the thread. I proved 140%+ turnout with the government created data.

^^^^ READ THE 3rd COLUMN "% Turnout"

 

Screw the "uncounted ballots". That election was stolen BEFOREHAND with the Felon Purge List and other voter suppression tactics. Can you do the math? The list took some 91,000 voters - most of them legal - off the voter rolls just before the election. HALF of them were African Americans. AAs voted 90% for Gore in Florida. Half of 91,000 legal voters is 45,500 African Americans. If only half of them had been allowed to vote, that would have been 22,750 additional voters. If they voted 90% for Gore, he would have had 20,470 more votes. Bush "won" Florida by 537 votes.

If legal voters aren't allowed to vote, their votes CAN'T be counted, can they? It was hugely successful for Republicans in putting George Bush in the WH and a huge disaster for the country. And you all have the gall to continually accuse Dems of "voter fraud" after what happened in FL in 2000 and Ohio in 2004? I've come to the conclusion that you all will believe anything you're fed no matter how ridiculous it is.

 

Since one voted strongly Republican and one less strongly Democrat, I guess I won't worry too much.

 

That is absolute bullcrap - just more of the deliberate lies and misinformation being fed to the Conservative base by people who have complete faith they'll be believed no matter WHAT by people who fall for every stupid thing they're told and never, ever try to reason it out or suspect when they're being lied to. After all - they can't possibly admit that they lost because they alienated women, minorities, young people, old people and that their ideas/policies are offensive to every rational person in this country, can they? Lmfao!

 

Save your righteous rage because I have never argued this issue, one way or the other, and I'm not going to try and defend what George Bush did in 2000.

I'm more interested in what Barack Obama and the democrats did just a week ago in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Colorado, etc.
and if you sick enablers want to hypocritically whine about Bush, while good evidence shows a pattern of voter fraud in 2012, be my guest.

 

They used absentee ballots, many voters either moved or have two residences but since that is a swing state their vote would only count if they voted in Colorado.

And these were mostly Democrats because they won.

 

Actually you did and here you are doing it.

http://www.politicalforum.com/curre...voters-than-people-hmmm-2.html#post1061942320

 

I believe you but I have not heard of any of this. What states is this happening in???

 

Taking 45,000/50,000 AA voters off the voter rolls isn't anywhere near subtle - it's a blatant act of voter suppression and outright cheating and they got away with it because by the time the total extent of the theft had been investigated and was known, 9-11 happened and it was suppressed in the face of our national disaster.

I think we'll be able to handle President Obama for 4 more years. We tolerated your illegal moral zero George Bush for 8 years while he was destroying the country so giving Obama 4 more years and keeping our welfare out of the hands of the same people who put us here won't be a problem.

Just curious - did you know Romney was planning to take the likes of John Bolton, Dick Cheney and others from the Bush/Cheney administration back to the WH with him if he won? They certainly kept THAT very quiet during the campaign, didn't they - and for good reason. If Romney supporters had known what a surprise he had in store for the country, he would have been lucky to get any electoral votes at all.

 

Actually...I didn't. Thanks for the help. As I patiently tried to explain to your childish wondering mind before, I was referencing the vote counting fiasco that involved certain democrat led Florida election boards with the help of the over ruled Florida Supreme Court. Not vote culling before the election even began.
If you aren't bright enough to see and appreciate the difference, what can I do?

I honestly don't see how anyone would go to the trouble of bringing forth a post as proof of something which absolutely demonstrates I didn't say one word about your petty post. It's stunningly ignorant.

 

I have already proven you did. Thanks for playing.

 

This is the worst, most childish and cowardly sort of trolling. You've been proven wrong. Your own "proof" shows what a (*)(*)(*)(*) up you are and still you lie and claim otherwise.

Let others read for themselves what a fool acts like. You're a waste of time.

 

Didn't take me long to figure out what was going on.

The reason it appears to be more ppl voting than registered is because the dimwits coming up with this silly conspiracy are looking at the "cards issued". In both Ohio, Colorado and Florida (as well as other states) we had lengthly ballots that required multiple Votomatic punch cards ran. Remember the hanging chads? Those were the result of use of the Votomatic system, which is still in use in some counties of Florida, including St. Lucie (which is why it's taken so long to tabulate the votes), Miami-Dade, and Brevard and I suspect also in Ohio.


I won't fault y'all for not realizing this (cuz you're not as smart as moi) but I will fault the idiot *********s at Townhall.com and other places because they knew what was going on...

Heck...even FOX didn't fall for this one...

 

Didn't take me long to figure out what was going on.

The reason it appears to be more ppl voting than registered is because the dimwits coming up with this silly conspiracy are looking at the "cards issued". In both Ohio, Colorado and Florida (as well as other states) we had lengthly ballots that required multiple Votomatic punch cards ran. Remember the hanging chads? Those were the result of use of the Votomatic system, which is still in use in some counties of Florida, including St. Lucie (which is why it's taken so long to tabulate the votes), Miami-Dade, and Brevard and I suspect also in Ohio.


I won't fault y'all for not realizing this (cuz you're not as smart as moi) but I will fault the idiot *********s at Townhall.com and other places because they knew what was going on...

Heck...even FOX didn't fall for this one...