Doesnt look to me like Ron Paul stormed out

You probably voted for W.

 

How perfectly foolish cons are when dumping on a individual's straight thinking just because it might be mirrored by many others, some of whom are in the media. They don't work on the FOX NEWS agenda of tailoring the news to reinforce lies upon the easily warped minds FOX has been molding for years. It's no surprise that hard core FOX viewers are more ignorant to facts than even those that watch no TV at all.

These condidates can't handle the heat of examination at a grade school level, but oh they're SO much better than Obama, the guy who's been kicking con asses all over DC and bringing the con-owned economy back from disaster yet again.

 

what does that have to do with ron paul lying about his newsletters?

 

He didnt lie.

I typed that as slowly as possible, so you could understand.

 

oh he lied alright

 

I dont think you have proven how he lied.

 

he said he didn't write in or even read his own newsletters, who do you think wrote this?:

St. Martin was a world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours ("non-violence" didn't apply in all spheres, I guess). He was a flagrant plagiarist with a phony doctorate. He replaced forced segregation in a few states with forced integration in all states. And he was a dedicated socialist. What a guy. He probably deserves two holidays.... In 1988 when I ran for president on the Libertarian Party ticket, I was berated for hours by LP members because I had refused to vote, while in Congress, for a Martin Luther King national holiday. I didn't know then about his plagiarism, but the rest of King's crimes were clear. J. Edgar Hoover once called him "the most dangerous man in America." Who could have known the danger would continue after his death and threaten to strangle our culture? (January 1991)

 

He said that in context of the racist statements.
Stop taking his words out of context.

You cant directly link Ron Paul to the racial statements.
Stop trying.

 

he is linked directly to the newsletters, he owned the company that published them, he profited from them, he was the editor, he promoted them, he discussed them publicly and he signed them



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAniuwIDNkI"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAniuwIDNkI[/ame]

 

Not proving anything.

 

have you noticed that your statements are often incorrect?

 

I notice you say that often.
Its boring.

 

show me another instance where i said, "have you noticed that your statements are often incorrect?"

 

exactly,thats the problem with these apologists,they dont do any research.

 

that poster goes around trolling everywhere.half the people on these boards laugh at him cause his ramblings are so easy to shoot down.

 

He never does in his ramblings.

 

that's funny coming from a truther

even ron paul isn't dumb enough to admit he's one

 

You resent his given reason for 9/11, which isn't "truther" rhetoric. What's your point?

 

my point is that even ron paul isn't dumb enough to admit he agrees with truthers, anything to topple the status quo, right?

 

Have to admit, I was one of those idiots who took the bait, without watching the actual video I even posted a thread, assuming he walked out of some debate that I must have missed, lol.

 

Yup, the Media tends to distort what the people see.

 

oh he definetly does.He resents anything that proves his ramblings pathetic.half the posters here will tell you the same thing that thats all he ever does here.cant believe he keeps coming back for the embarrasement he gets here everyday.

 

oh yeah,they have a thing called EDITING.

 

Ron Paul isn't a "truther" though. But, his reasons for 9/11 are still in that category, being that it doesn't follow the official story.

Ron Paul gives "Blowback" as the reason. It's actually supported by historical events. But, he hasn't resented the "truther" movement.

 

thats okay,he DID say before on alex jones show before running for president that there needs to be a new investigation into it so thats the important thing that he supports a new investigation into it.also you got to remember,he has some supporters who are not 9/11 truthers as well so even if he believes it was an inside job he has to be careful and not come out and say that so he doesnt lose support from his ron paul supporters.

I know some ron paul supporters here on this site matter of fact who are not truthers either so he has to be careful and not say what he really thinks.