Discussion in 'JFK' started by resisting arrest, Dec 2, 2017.
Stunning Eye-Witness Testimony by Dr. Crenshaw. Astonishing !!!!!!!!!!
It is nothing new it is old and long since debunked. He presents no evidence
He does present evidence since he was an eyewitness. He was there. He looked at the president's body and saw the wounds.
He made only a brief casual observation and was not trained in pathology.
His observation is not evidence it is only an opinion and proven wrong by the expert autopsy.
An opinion by a medical expert with 12 years of academic study plus years of medical experience. End of story.
He was an expert in emergency room treatment which is what he was doing at the time and the expertise of the doctors who performed the autopsy far exceeds his.
Yes THAT is the end of the story and Crenshaw is discredited and proven false with no evidence.
Jut as all of your childish conspiracy claims are debunked
you have noticed that you are the ONLY poster who has posted on this thread right? lol you could not have said it any better,you took everyone to school,end of story.
No he was schooled as you were as well
and still NOBODY after this post of mine has yet to post notice that? wonder when they will come dont you?
And everyone still knows the truth which is that you are wrong
Not at all true. There are a significant number of americans who believe the truth has never been revealed. So, stop pulling fecal matter out and toying with it, for we all know what that stuff looks like and smells like. lol And we have seen more than enough of it from your team. But no need to indulge in deceit by claiming everyone knows the truth.
One of the things that point to a conspiracy is the Warren Report. It is full of holes, mystery, and even trying to use deceit will not fill up those numerous holes, or get rid of the incoherence that is always present in conspiracies.
There are two extreme groups involved here. One is the crowd that sees a conspiracy with every notable event. The other crowd does not believe in a single conspiracy ever existing. And if you notice an incoherence which makes one logically think of a conspiracy, this crowd will do the CIA a favor and pull the conspiracy theory card from their well worn deck of knee jerk reactions that require no firing of the neurons, just silence of thought.
As long as you have sociopaths that seem to be attracted and lust after power, in the process of them getting it and holding onto it, will naturally create conspiracies. Some never see the light of day, but some do. I dunno what was really involved in the JFK murder, but you don't have to know the truth, in order to see that too many incoherences point to a lie, and even a conspiracy. These incoherences should introduce doubt, but due to a mental disability , a problem with cognition, it does not introduce doubt with the crowd who do not believe conspiracies happen. This belief defies historical fact, given what we do know about fleshed out conspiracies much later on. And so, IMO, are just like the people who see a conspiracy with every notable event, Rendering such minds as unimportant and superfluous, when it comes to serious adults talking about potential conspiracies. As extremism generally is useless as teats on a boar hog.
What I stated is very true in fact.
Even other conspiracy theorists laugh at 911wasaninsidejob and his ilk. He has been crushed and debunked repeatedly and he knows it as do you.
Now as for your specifics first of all I have no team. Second you are wrong about the Warren Commission report and like most you have no idea what it states because you have never read it.
Specifically point to any of these holes, or mysteries or deceits and do so with quotes and evidence. You obviosuly will not do so because you are incapable of doing so.
There is no crowd which believes a single conspiracy ever existed.
The two sides are conspiracy fools and intelligent people.
You cannot specifically identify any of these incoherences you refer to because it is simply something you heard of which is not true
yep yep and yep.
nope nope and nope as proven
Separate names with a comma.