EU Parliament report says regime change needed in Russia, recommends Brussels launch propaganda TV

It's well-know EU is run by arrogant morons.The support of Putin now is higher as 70%, but EU practically helps to increase it up to 90% or more.
Russians don't want to be fooled again like in 1990s, they know how 'democracy' looks like in reality. The last example is Ukraine. EU can put its visas and propaganda channel in a.., Russians are proud people who don't want any relationship with enemies.
If Putin would be not too weak he could already break any diplomatic relations with all EU states and leaved all its organizations.
By support of Ukrainian Nazis EU had showed Russians they are worthless animals who can be killed to tens of thousands without any punishment.In 2014 EU was laughing as Ukrainian Nazis burned alive more as 500 Russians in Odessa

Not content material with months of worsening relations and the potential for navy escalation, the European Parliament has now put ahead a draft report insisting the EU must be extra confrontational in its strategy to Moscow.
A draft report published on-line by the meeting’s Committee on Overseas Affairs precipitated consternation in Russian media on Monday, after statements got here to gentle that argued the bloc “ought to set up with the US a transatlantic alliance to defend democracy globally” and “deter Russia” from supposed aggression in Japanese Europe.
As a part of its “imaginative and prescient” for future ties with Moscow, the paper concludes that the EU ought to put ahead a lot of incentives designed to steer Russians {that a} flip to the West could be useful, together with visa liberalization and “free commerce funding.”
It provides that the bloc “must also convey the potential advantages that it’s keen to supply in return for a democratic transformation of Russia,” successfully committing it to a method of regime change, with out commenting on the recognition of its present authorities or the preferences of voters.

https://atdux.com/eu-parliament-rep...unch-propaganda-tv-channel-to-help-it-happen/

Russians know EU desires death of any single Russian and will receive not the desired 'regime change' but nukes to Bruxelles.Russians are ready to war with EU and go to China

 

Still pushing that propaganda of 500 killed at Odessa.....show the links for those 500?

Is there still massive protests in Odessa ,Mariupol....Ostap Bandera?

 

There are not much protests because any resistance to the fascist regime in Kiev can be punished by a paramilitary murder.
Google, Youtube, Twitter and another presstitutes clean up and delete continuously any trustworthy information about supported by the West tontonmakutas regime in Ukraine
It's the reason why any relationship between the West and Russia is destroyed al least for 100 years.
Later as in 5 years Russia and China will build an Union and EU can go to Hell!

 

LOL...no "paramilitary murder".....more of a case of no one wants any part of Russki Mir.....much like in DPR.....which is a disaster....Putinka has no strategy or endgame.....the gamble didn't pay off ,now he's stuck in a quagmire.....and residents without hot showers in Krym seems to be growing by the week.

 

I think this would be of interest to the readers just so they'll know what we're up against. It explains at least to me, why our destroyers didn't enter the Black Sea and why Britain's show of force ended up being a small ship with machine guns.

Alexander Mercouris has always been accurate in his assessments, and in this one he's giving an account of the latest weaponry in the Russian Federation's arsenal.

 

Putin is not weak. When the first sanctions were imposed, he said he will only respond in ways that will be beneficial to the Russian people, and not in ways that will be detrimental to them. He's gradually saying the hell with the EU. It's dying anyway, and he wants to create an opposing financial system.

I don't know if Putin will manage it, because the world is being pushed towards war by Erdogan's demagoguery. What Putin has done though, is to secure Russia's survival no matter what happens. He said that was his goal, rather than trying to quickly build up Russia's economy.



Unlike some others in our sphere,
to me Russia is: 'Mother Dear'.

So if you try to break her heart
and vilely try to grab a part,

through devious means with lies and guile
which as we know is your style,

then also know you'll suffer ill
and find it a very bitter pill.

As others have who came before
and didn't know what was in store

for them - Jeannette

 

Such wishful thinking.... that "regime change" would affect any one damn thing...Russians are all about what's best for Mother Russia, they're funny that way.

 

By the way, how the West want to fight Russia.

USA organized the coup in Ukraine, now its entirely industry is gone,real salaries have been continuously decreased down to 200%, unemployment rate is sky-high, most of youth and well-educated fled a country run by criminal thieves and imbecile Nazis. Indeed nice 'fruits' of an orange revolution.

 

Putin shall break any relationship with the West which is run by completely insane crackpots.
Why wasting money for unnecessary discussions while NATO prepares attack Russia.
Better to put money in new nukes which can calm down some hot temperaments,
The war NATO-Russia will take place 100% because the West never agreed with existence of independent Russia.
Moreover the West badly needs Russian commodities for free.

NATO’s military noose round Russia’s borders is being tightened in order to force Moscow to react to surging provocation, Brian Cloughley writes.


One of the most recent developments on the NATO front line was a meeting of the so-called ‘Bucharest Nine’ which the analytical agency Stratfor states “is a group of NATO’s easternmost members, including Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Most of these countries share strategic interests on issues such as deterring potential Russian aggression, keeping close cooperation with the United States, diversifying their sources of energy, and developing joint infrastructure projects.” The purpose of the video get-together, attended by President Biden and NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, was, according to the US-NATO military alliance “to take the agenda forward” in its mission “to consolidate views on issues of interest in the Alliance for the participating nations, and to support joint security projects.”


In other words, the purpose of the Bucharest Nine is to help NATO exert even further pressure on Russia’s western border regions, as part of the US-NATO confrontation that is being ramped up while the US and its NATO allies retreat from Afghanistan where they have been defeated in a war that has humiliated the world’s most expensive and sophisticated military machines. They’ve been beaten into the ground by a bunch of raggy-baggy militants who don’t have any strike aircraft or drones or tanks or artillery. The Taliban have no intention of permitting democracy in Afghanistan, when they eventually take over, after NATO’s retreat, and the country will be plunged into a maelstrom of theocratic bigotry and barbarity.


NATO followed the US into Afghanistan in August 2003 with the mission “to enable the Afghan authorities and build the capacity of the Afghan national security forces to provide effective security, so as to ensure that Afghanistan would never again be a safe haven for terrorists.” It declares that the war and the transition to a training role in 2015, have represented “NATO’s longest and most challenging mission to date: at its height, the force was more than 130,000 strong with troops from 50 NATO and partner nations.” And they still got whipped by a few thousand militants who objected to the presence of foreign forces in their country.


So it’s back to Europe for US-NATO, having had a fun-war on Libya in 2011 when it blasted the country in the name of peace. This fandango of savagery was named “Unified Protector” but all it protected was the profits of Western arms manufacturers. After seven months of bombing and rocketing the country, involving 9,600 airstrikes, the then NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen went to Tripoli and declared he was “proud of the part the Organization and its partners played in helping the country and the region.” But as we know only too well, the country is in chaos.


As I wrote six years ago, two prominent figures involved in the US-NATO war on Libya were Ivo Daalder, the US Representative on the NATO Council from 2009 to 2013, and Admiral James G (‘Zorba’) Stavridis, the US Supreme Allied Commander Europe (the military commander of NATO) in the same period. As they ended their war, on October 31, 2011, these two ninnies had a piece published in the New York Times in which they made the absurd claim that “As Operation Unified Protector comes to a close, the alliance and its partners can look back at an extraordinary job, well done. Most of all, they can see in the gratitude of the Libyan people that the use of limited force — precisely applied — can affect real, positive political change.”


But Human Rights Watch reports that the civil war unleashed by the US-NATO destruction of the country has “hampered the provision of basic services including health and electricity. Armed groups on all sides continued to kill unlawfully and shell indiscriminately, killing civilians and destroying vital infrastructure.” And for those seeking to flee the anarchic bedlam there is no support from NATO countries. The US-NATO military intervention in Libya has resulted in a massive number of human rights atrocities of which the world — and especially Obama, Daalder, Stavridis and Rasmussen — should be deeply ashamed. According to Human Rights Watch, “Migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees in Libya — including thousands intercepted at sea while trying to reach Europe and returned by the European Union-supported Libyan Coast Guard — faced arbitrary detention, during which many experienced ill-treatment, sexual assault, forced labour, and extortion . . .”


The only achievements of the US-NATO military alliance in the last twenty years or so have been destruction of Afghanistan and Libya and infliction of destitution and death on countless millions of people. So it is time for the alliance to focus on another sphere of operations in order to try to justify its existence. It’s back to the happy Cold War days, and at the European Council on 6 May Secretary General Stoltenberg was pleased to announce that “Just as we speak, we are deploying thousands of troops as part of a NATO exercise and we do that in Romania. And it demonstrates how we mobilize and exercise NATO troops, and also how we’re able to deploy them across Europe.” Just as they did in Afghanistan.


Then came the meeting of the Bucharest Nine, at which President Biden announced overwhelming approval for the confrontation policy and “expressed his support for enhancing NATO’s deterrence and defence posture, as well as the importance of Allies increasing their resilience against harmful economic and political actions by our strategic competitors… he welcomed the opportunity to engage with these Allies – as well as with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who was also in attendance – about Alliance efforts to meet future threats, which will be discussed at the June 14 NATO Summit.”


It is all stoking up for an ultimate head-to-head, and there is no indication that President Biden will agree to talk with President Putin before the NATO summit. In fact, even if the White House does begin to consider dialogue rather than confrontation it is unlikely that Biden will withdraw his 2020 declaration that “I think the biggest threat to America right now in terms of breaking up our security and our alliances is Russia.”


Biden’s “unshakeable” commitment to NATO, together with his unqualified support for the ’Bucharest Nine’ and for the increasing NATO military buildup along Russia’s borders are open indications of his intention to continue Washington’s confrontation policy, using NATO as the US front-runner. The surge along “NATO’s Eastern Flank” at present involves manoeuvres called “Steadfast Defender”, which Stoltenberg declares “will test NATO’s readiness and military mobility – with forces deploying across land and sea, all the way from North America to the Black Sea region and off the coast of Portugal.”


Although it is evident that US-NATO is not exactly the most efficient military alliance in recent history, given the debacles, destruction and ensuing chaos in Afghanistan and Libya, it is only too evident that it is determined to ensure “rapid reinforcement of NATO’s European Allies by North American forces” in order to exert more military pressure on Russia. As announced by the Pentagon’s John Kirby, the “Defender Europe” NATO manoeuvres in May-June are intended to demonstrate “lethality” in “the Balkan and Black Sea regions in particular”.


NATO’s military noose round Russia’s borders is being tightened in order to force Moscow to react to surging provocation. There is no possible benefit to the world, to humankind, in this belligerent confrontation. But the Pentagon and its sub-office in Brussels are determined to intensify NATO’s border buildup and sabre-brandishing.

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/05/18/the-tightening-of-the-nato-noose/

 

Putin shall completely prohibit the Fifth Column and help Russia to rebuild its industry.
He shall ask millions of Russian immigrants worldwide for support like Erdogan it does.

 

ALL of Ukraines industry is gone???....yah don't say!!??...salaries down 200% and unemployment is sky high?? You have links for these #s, or are these just hallucinations?

Funny...if salaries went down 200%...there should be insurrection everywhere, yet its calm and people are working.

Otoh though
http://www.uawire.org/97-of-russian-population-earns-less-than-minimum-wage-at-macdonald-s

And Botox putinka wants conventional war with Nato/US with #like that.

Ever since Orange revolution Ukraine has made great strides towards Nato interoperability and EU standards,while asiatic moskals smoke machorka and guzzle samogon.)

 

False claim about the removal of Putin's stooge, and your description of Ukraine's economy sounds exactly like it was under indirect Russian control. Those conditions are precisely why the Ukrainians want to join the EU and why they were righteously pissed when Putin's puppet went against his promise to do so. They're poor people who are tired of being kept down by the Kremlin for Russia's benefit.

 

DSL sucks.

 

Back to the propaganda and lies I see? Yanukovich was never Putin's stooge and had every intention of joining the EU. The problem was that Ukraine had many beneficial trade deals with Russia, and they would have had to end if they joined the EU. There was no way that Russia could allow EU goods to enter under those deals. ,

When Yanukovich realized that the EU lied, and that Ukraine would have lost something like 150 billion a year and not 35 billion as they said. He knew Ukraine couldn't afford it so he asked the EU to cover the losses. They said no and told him to go to the IMF.

In order to give Ukraine the loan, the IMF wanted them to double their fuel prices, and to lower its social services 70%. Yanukovich couldn't do that if he hoped to get elected again, so he backed out.

Russia was willing to talk to the EU about it and see if some arrangement could be made, but again they said no. Of course Nuland and company never told the Ukrainian people what was really going on so she could put in Yatsenuk.

The junta took the loan and half was stolen by the oligarchs while the IMF looked the other way and the people suffered. But who dared say anything when Nazis are in charge.

The coup was in 2015, so how are they enjoying the EU? I read that the Ukrainian economy now is on the same level as Somalia?



YEAH! YEAH! YEAH! YEAH!

Some thinkest others not too bright
so falsity must rule.
But thinking thus is but a blight
that makest them the fool - Jeannette

 

Ukraine economy the same as Somalia "???....you read it somewhere?

I'll take 2 guesses....brick $hithouse wall , or some RT urinal?

 

That GIF suits you perfectly.

 

Regime change.... you'd think after Saddam they have more sense than to actually say "regime change"

The Biden Administration and EU are dividing the world, pushing Russia who I considered to be cleverly straddling the divide, towards Iran, Turkey and China. Their lacklustre support of Israel is also giving countries like Pakistan and Turkey a green light to intervene in Gaza/Israel conflict. Armenian genocide & "Kurdistan"issues are used to ignite more fires. Pretty much everything the US is doing today is simply stirring old hatreds, waking sleeping conflict after conflict, while at the same time using migrants to destabilise those areas not in conflict. (refer US southern border and Hillary's ventures in Libya)
This is merely the execution of a longterm plan and a deliberate strategy.

 

Quite possible. They would be a formidable force - China will be the world's economic power with a very strong military, Russia can contribute nukes and vodka.

 

the best the EU can do would be the oposite really
acept putins regime & open up trade and cooperation with russia instead of sanctions. want to bet his support would drop significantly over time.

 

Actually Russia has the strongest military second to the US - and with its newest weaponry and electronics, they could be even more advanced than we are. Russia is now thinking of not using nukes as a deterrent, since their other capabilities would be sufficient enough to defend Russia.

 

Why would Putin's support drop? We're heading towards a Soviet Style liberal world government and they suffered it for 70 years, so why would they want it again? Also they saw what we did to them in the 90's, when all its wealth was being shipped to off shore accounts while the Russians suffered.

Besides that, even if Putin was not to run, the people who voted for him and for Parliament, would vote for others with the same ideals - because that's what they want. It's called democracy.

What would be a better idea would be to try to fix the mess in our own country, before telling others what's best for them. Maybe we would start gaining some respect.

 

Aircraft carriers are a real bitch.

 

Russians would welcome a change in leadership if it meant an actual change for the better but they see the propaganda against Russia and Russian way of live and see Putin as a strong leader against it which is appealing and why he has a high approval rate.

 

The asiatic Russkis are probably 5th or 6th on a scale right now....China would roll over them conventionally in 72 hrs or less....Moskolia is a regional power at best. Where's their aircraft carrier....still sitting crooked in some half froze harbor?

 

He is a Russian propagandist. Don't waste your time .