Everything's under control...

When respect is intended...you're probably correct.

 

No, as a matter of good grammar.

Is this how you spin off topic?

 

No...it's how I address an entertaining poster.

 

Since you lack evidence, dodging is all you can do.

 

Yeah...I suppose you're right again..

Please don't have me banned again...okay?

 

Since you said "please". Okay.

Now.

Evidence: got any?

 

None that you would accept....no. We good now?

 

Just more excuses to cover your lack of evidence.

 

Okay...I'll try to obey you if you'll allow me the chance.

 

Not asking for obedience. I'm asking for evidence.

Do you have any?

 

None that you would accept. No.

 

I would accept any evidence. So far, 'truthers' haven't presented any.

Opinions and wild speculations, yes? (Fetzer's laser beams from space, for example.)

 

You'll accept any theory that is pro "official". I know....We all know.

 

I said I would accept any evidence.

I said nothing about official, nor did I say theory. Changing my words is dishonest.

Evidence.

 

This bot's programmer has put a lot of effort into the martyr complex portion of his code.

 

No, I'm not. Go back and read the thread for the context.

 

I'm not totally closed. As I stated, I'd look at any evidence presented. Do you have any?

 

What makes you think there isn't 'serious evidence?

 

I have looked at the evidence presented from all sides.

Do you have anything to contradict the evidence presented by NIST, FEMA, FBI, and engineering schools and professionals worldwide?

 

Religious extremists commit atrocities every day, have done so for thousands of years. Their motives make no sense, but that doesn't change the facts. Your 'ragtag bunch of Muslims' were college educated and determined individuals.

Your last sentence is opinion. Do you have evidence to contradict the physical, criminal and forensic evidence provided.

 

What makes you think there was no motive?

 

it gets posted here on this board daily...open your eyes

 

What motives of Americans who may have been behind it do you see?

The "ragtag bunch of muslims" are a highly organized group of well funded religious fundamentalists that have networks all over the planet. They have sophisticated training facilities and well outlined goals.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/nov/24/theobserver

It doesn't get more clear then that. If you can see no motive, then you are clearly unwilling to look.

This is false. There have been numerous attacks by Al-Qaeda before and after 9/11. They attacked the Trade center twice, the U.S.S. Cole, 2 U.S. embassies, bombed Bali tourists, set off 4 truck bombs in Istanbul, detonated 4 bombs in London, Amman, Algiers, the Danish embassy in Pakistan, etc. If you think 9/11 is the only attack by Al-Qaeda you are quite misinformed.

 

The prosecutors of Zacarias Moussaoui would seem to disagree with this statement. Using the above mentioned evidence, they secured an indictment, trial and conviction.

What is the source for the above claim? As far as I've ever seen, it's only shown up on 'truther' sites, and has no basis in evidence or fact.

I consider people like John Edwards, Jim Bakker, Oral Roberts and Charles Manson to all be religious extremists. They all committed atrocities of one degree or another. And yes, every one of them partied loud with alcohol and women of questionable morals.

 

PBL ... your back again ... did you miss us then ...

http://www.politicalforum.com/1061072849-post83.html