https://www.theguardian.com/environ...ising-public-on-climate-veteran-activist-says It has become apparent that many consider that it is ok to break laws if your cause you lobby for is Important enough to society (according to the particular protagonists). In Australia, Greens made correlation between bushfires and climate change while in other areas of the nation snow fell. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-22/bushfire-arson-warning-ahead-of-school-holidays/11528192 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-20/why-do-people-light-bushfires-a-convicted-arsonist-explains/9162190 So, 85% of bushfires are human induced… So nothing to do with climate change at all… Anyway, As quoted there are many reasons for arsonists to light fires and many have nothing to do with fires themselves. Complaining that bushfires are direct outcome of climate change and supporting breaking the law for a cause these Green groups support while demonising others for holding to account for doing so, the question has to be asked: Just how many of these “so called” green activists light bushfires to highlight their cause??? Now I know, many will try subjugate the subject and many will attempt to suggest it could never happen. But the truth is it reality. Now, Australia has been busy indoctrinating the children, in accordance with the head of the climate council the completely discredited Tim Flannery, it doesn’t take much (in the words of activists) “Yes XR is going to create inconvenience, but they are telling people what to expect. It is totally acceptable what they’re doing...” So, were do people draw the line???