Family says son killed by police in ‘swatting’ was unarmed, didn’t play video games

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Angrytaxpayer, Dec 30, 2017.

  1. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Based on race. I rest my case.
     
    guavaball likes this.
  2. GoogleMurrayBookchin

    GoogleMurrayBookchin Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2017
    Messages:
    6,654
    Likes Received:
    2,239
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you really think that this is the only way things can be?
     
  3. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you've got nothing once again. This is my shocked face.

    Do I think citizens should obey the police in a standoff and that is the only way? Absolutely.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2017
    roorooroo likes this.
  4. iamanonman

    iamanonman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    4,826
    Likes Received:
    1,576
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't take lethal action unless you see a weapon. Opinions from an overwhelming majority of police officers say they would never issue commands and then pull the trigger if they mess up and there's no weapon visible. Remember, in the heat of the moment innocent people are going to be very confused and not fully comprehend the situation. They haven't had practice getting arrested or having a gun pointed at them.

    By the way, I realize you may not have intended to come across this way, but your posts wreak of "that guy got what he deserved" mentality.
     
    Jarlaxle, Guno and Antiduopolist like this.
  5. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you want to risk more police lives because citizens cannot follow basic instructions.

    I would love to see the proof you have of this claim since you conveniently leave out the important fact that this kid repeatedly reached for his waistband where a weapon is traditionally held while refusing to comply multiple times.

    Confused? If anything your senses would be immediately heightened and when someone screams at you to keep your hands up multiple times while pointing a weapon at you.

    The only people who would assume that was my argument didn't read what I actually said and replaced facts with emotion.

    Why are you so willing to excuse a citizen who refuses to comply with the orders of police in a tense situation? Why is that basic concept so distasteful to you?

    You want to excuse civilians for not complying and putting police in even greater danger based on a theory that they are confused and I'm not willing to do that.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2017
    glitch and roorooroo like this.
  6. MVictorP

    MVictorP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    7,663
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can and I will.
     
  7. MVictorP

    MVictorP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    7,663
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You talk as if cops were some kind of hard-programmed automatons. These guys are supposed to have judgement. I can't figure how come these guys passed their police courses with so little judgement - I suspect their parents were policemen themselves.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2017
    Guno likes this.
  8. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then you are allowing your emotions and not facts dictate your response.

    The kid refused to comply with orders and repeatedly went for his waistband which is traditionally where a gun would be. Why are you excusing this behavior?
     
  9. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What part of refusing to comply with multiple orders and multiple times reaching for his waistband do you not understand?
     
  10. MVictorP

    MVictorP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    7,663
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He was in his right. He didn't have to comply to "orders". It was to the police to "comply" to reality. That's what they're supposed to be paid for (the victim wasn't paid).
     
    Guno likes this.
  11. MVictorP

    MVictorP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    7,663
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What part of not having judgement enough to be put in any position of authority do you not understand?

    Mafia goons would have made a better, bloodless job for crying out loud. What are these officers are, frightened little girls? How come such nervous jackasses ended up with guns in the first place? That's what you call a police?
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2017
    Guno likes this.
  12. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    a high burden of proof should be on the state not the individual. That's what a lover of liberty would demand.
     
    Jarlaxle and Labouroflove like this.
  13. iamanonman

    iamanonman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    4,826
    Likes Received:
    1,576
    Trophy Points:
    113
    First, that's in dispute. The other occupants of the house who witnessed the incident say instructions were not given. Second, no weapon was found on the subject. Third, assuming instructions were given did he refuse or did he sh*t his pants? I think you're making some pretty bold claims about facts that aren't known yet. Maybe we should wait and see what the investigation turns up?
     
    Jarlaxle and Antiduopolist like this.
  14. iamanonman

    iamanonman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    4,826
    Likes Received:
    1,576
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Umm...because an innocent person died.
     
  15. iamanonman

    iamanonman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    4,826
    Likes Received:
    1,576
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly. I don't want to open the door to my own house and then play and impromptu game of Simon Says with a guy that has a gun pointed at me in which one mistake gets me killed. I'm pretty sure in the heat of the moment I wouldn't even recognize they were law enforcement officers. I would just think "holy sh*t I'm going to die" and then fight or flight would kick in. I doubt I would fully comprehend what was going on. Does that I mean I should die? I don't think so.
     
  16. JET3534

    JET3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2014
    Messages:
    13,381
    Likes Received:
    11,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Federal training at DHS's Federal Law Enforcement Training Center includes shoot/don't shoot training comprised of many scenarios similar to this incident. State and local police need to have similar training. All firearm training should mandate keeping one's figure off of the trigger until a decision is made to shoot. In this case the cop is guilty of manslaughter IMHO although they often get away with this sort of thing.
     
    Guno and ThorInc like this.
  17. JET3534

    JET3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2014
    Messages:
    13,381
    Likes Received:
    11,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He "reached for his waistband" is one of the standard reasons given by cops after they execute someone just like a claim of resisting arrest is the standard reason for beating the [expletive] out of someone.
     
    Jarlaxle, Guno, Cubed and 1 other person like this.
  18. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    this is america, shut up and do as you're told, or die.
     
  19. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't worry, what you allow the state to do to someone else, it will do to you eventually.
     
  20. Antiduopolist

    Antiduopolist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2016
    Messages:
    24,354
    Likes Received:
    10,858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah.........no.
     
    roorooroo likes this.
  21. Antiduopolist

    Antiduopolist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2016
    Messages:
    24,354
    Likes Received:
    10,858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not entirely disagreeing, but the anti-cop hysteria I hear from people at times...
     
  22. Antiduopolist

    Antiduopolist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2016
    Messages:
    24,354
    Likes Received:
    10,858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

    If they wait to check the caller out TOO much, a hostage may die, and if they go in with NO caller check, a tragedy may occur.

    This was a bad, new and unusual situation for which the caller should be held HEAVILY accountable.

    But as an armchair quarterback, I do think the fact that the call was coming from out of state might should have been a red flag.

    As a counter to even this, if the police demanded that everyone identify themselves and give an address every time they called, the police would be called a LOT less.

    It's a tough balance, and this ended tragically.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2017
    Arkie and Ddyad like this.
  23. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    28,013
    Likes Received:
    21,311
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But cops don't have to 'use their noggin' when raiding your home...
     
  24. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How about you come to terms with that a police officer is a person who does unskilled labor.
    It is just what it is. And those people make f*ck ups. And they should be held accountable for all of that.
    Currently it's like oops, I accidentally killed somebody over nothing, like... yeah I killed me a mosquito too.
     
    Guno likes this.
  25. Capitalism

    Capitalism Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2014
    Messages:
    5,129
    Likes Received:
    786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just can't wait for more people to start shooting back at police, once they figure out they are poorly trained licensed tax collectors who have minimal accountability, the better off this nation will be.
     
    Guno and Labouroflove like this.

Share This Page