FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election

Fake news. Fake. News. Unnamed source. Fakeeeeeee news.

 

LOL, you mean like the fake news about the CIA?

 

Are unnamed sources fake or are they not? You cannot have it both ways.

 

So you agree the OP is BS.

 

So political games are your biggest issue? Lol. It's not like she called him Lyin' Bernie or low energy lol

- - - Updated - - -

Saying they did not influence the election is not saying they did not try.

 

History is written by the winners. Time will decide if the OP is right or wrong.

 

Funny as (*)(*)(*)(*).

 

No. What the national party chair did, was conspire with HRC to schedule primary debates in favorable sites, and on dates / times when TV viewership would be zero.

 

July...we love comey, hes a straight shooter and a great american
November..comey is a liar and a traitor who cost Hillary the election.
December...we love comey again he is saying russia did it...hes a stand up guy again


Lol I am so entertained by this you guys....thanks so much. I literally couldnt make this election end any better.

 

Problem , the truth stands in the way Wilkileaks published these emails, not Russia. Assange said Russia was not his source. So, the Truth just revealed the liars. Assange does not lie as a part of his profession. The CIA does, and now you have to suspect the FBI.

If revealing the truth hurts the person the truth is about, that is a good thing. If truth destroys our election system, if truth threatens democracy....well, it can do neither. Truth make our system stronger, not weaker, so if Russia did it, they made us stronger. And we kept out corruption.

 

Assange lies all of the time. He's been caught at least 6 times that I remember.

 

The problem is that selective truth is not really truth at all!

- - - Updated - - -

Well that has now been proven to be nonsense. Next.

 

I think you are lying. For you have zero evidence. Unlike democrats, he values honesty and integrity. His mission is to "out" people like you saw in the DNC. Corrupt human beings, operating like a crime family.

 

Are you calling me a liar?

- - - Updated - - -

You mean like the Trumps?

 

If it is truth, truth by its very nature stands on its own. The truth of what the DNC was doing as a supposed neutral democratic organization, in regards to sanders and Clinton stands on its own. Revealing the way public servants are in action is in the public's interests. If you got scumbags working for you, you are grateful to know. The truth of what they are is important, given what is at stake.

 

Trump has been delegitimized by the exposure of the Russian interference in the POTU election.

 

Everyone who still supports trump should be rounded up and dropped off in Siberia with no shelter.
Wanna be Russian so bad? Go ahead and be it in Russia.

 

The thing is, he's the one who knows. Everybody else is just guessing.

Oh, and the CIA has been caught lying far more than 6 times. It's kinda what they do.

AND, WaPo says Russia's other intention was to undermine American confidence in the electoral system. Which is ironically what WaPo itself is doing with this article. They must be Russian agents, huh?

 

Assange claimed to have some of trumps emails but declined to release them. Didn't you find it odd how one sided it was? He's a filthy liar.

 

Of course, you would never consider the possibility that, unlike the DNC, Trump may not have been stupid enough to digitally communicate incriminating evidence. See, MOST people who don't think they are above the law (because they own the system) know not to e-mail the types of things the DNC did.

Also, maybe you don't realize what you did here, but you just admitted that the release of DNC emails, and not Trump's, was Assange's decision, not the Russians. You just refuted your own case.

 

What? How did I refute my own case? everyone knows wikileaks released the podesta emails. They were given to Assange by hackers connected to the Russian government. Snowden and Assange are Russian agents.

 

You refuted your own case by saying that Assange also had Trump's e-mails (and if the DNC e-mails came from Russian hackers, it stands to reason that Trump's did as well). So if Russia gave Assange both sets of e-mails, and Assange (not Russia) decided to release only the DNC ones (undoubtedly because those emails were the ones that showed wrongdoing), then it was not Russia's decision at all.

 

So you disagree with obama:


[video=youtube;y7F7eRM1oiU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7F7eRM1oiU[/video]

 

They're telling Assange when and what to Publish. Russia wouldn't publish it themselves. They need protection. They need a cover. That's wikileaks.

- - - Updated - - -

I just realized you're one of the pizza gate weirdos. I don't talk to those people. So we are done.

 

Prove it. Your assertions aren't proof.