FBI Informant Stefan Halper Paid Over $1 Million By Obama Admin; Spied On Trump Aide After Election

Uhhh, Maybe not.

If Mifsud truly is a Russian agent – which is key to the collusion narrative – he could prove to be one of the most dangerous spies in modern history. Western intelligence agencies and European politicians would have to spend the next few decades repairing the damage he did to global security by infiltrating key institutions and personnel. But, oddly enough, as of yet, there is no indication that any intelligence service has begun the embarrassing, but highly important, assessment of how it was penetrated and how it can re-fortify the vulnerabilities that Mifsud may have exposed! There has been no public effort to arrest him.

Funny That!

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/26/the_maltese_phantom_of_russiagate_.html

 

White House Official Feels ‘Duped’ By FBI SPY Who Sought Ambassadorship.

White House trade czar Peter Navarro said he feels “duped” by Stefan Halper, the FBI Spy who sought out members of President Donald Trump’s campaign and applied for an ambassadorship in Trump’s administration.

At the time he submitted his application for the ambassadorship, Halper was spying on Trump for the FBI. As part of that under cover operation, Halper met with three Trump campaign associates — Carter Page, Sam Clovis and George Papadopoulos.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/05/30/peter-navarro-stefan-halper-fbi/

 

Whenever you have Secret Police spies, informers and treacherous schemes are inevitable.

"It has often been noticed that the effectiveness of terror depends almost entirely on the degree of social atomization. Every kind of organized opposition must disappear before the full force of terror can be let loose. This atomization—an outrageously pale, Academic word for the horror it implies—is maintained and intensified through the ubiquity of the informer, who can be literally omnipresent because he no longer is merely a professional agent in the pay of the police but potentially every person one comes into contact with." Hannah Arendt, On Violence, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, NY, 1970. p. 55.

 

Excellent points. The evil of government spying on US, the very folks who grant them OUR power.

Documents Reveal Obama White House Attempted to Take Over Spygate Investigation

 

Well we know Mifsud was lying about being a "member" of the Clinton Foundation, even your link admits he never was, so why should any of his denials be believed. Remember Papadopoulos lied at first too, until he was caught.

 

Well according to Donnie Dirt Bag's Spy Lie, Halper was embedded in his campaign, but your own link reveals he was never embedded in anything, campaign or administration, so we know Donnie Dirt Bag is lying as usual.

 

He didn't get the ambassadorship the Spy wanted.

 

Mifsud, whose circles are tied to the Clintons, may, like another professor recently in the news, Stefan Halper, have actually been working for Western intelligence agencies.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/26/the_maltese_phantom_of_russiagate_.html

 

Thank you for admitting he wasn't embedded and therefore Donnie Dirt Bag lied as usual.

 

Your own link admits there is no REAL connection to the Clintons. You only have the word of a lying Russian spy who was trying to help Donnie Dirt Bag win.

 

The refusal of DOJ/FBI to submit to Congressional oversight should result in the elimination of both outlaw bureaucracies.

 

Anyone working for MI-6 is also working for Russian intelligence.

 

I certainly support disbanding the FBI and rolling their duties into the US Marshall's service.

 

If Joseph Mifsud truly is a Russian agent, it is odd that neither the Western intelligence agencies he snookered nor the U.S. government is acting as if he is.

The FBI interviewed Mifsud in Washington, D.C., between Feb. 8-12, 2017, less than two weeks after its first interview with Papadopoulos, on Jan. 27, when he admitted to meeting Mifsud and talking about Hilary Clinton emails.

Mifsud was in Washington to speak at the large annual conference for Global Ties U.S., an organization that has been a partner of the U.S. State Department for over 50 years. Several State Department officials also spoke at the conference. France’s ambassador to Washington, Gerard Araud, was one of several foreign envoys to the United States who lectured at the 2017 event.

So, why did the FBI not arrest Mifsud? The State Department declined to say why it did not prevent its officials from appearing at an event with a “Kremlin-linked” figure who was key to Russia’s effort to interfere in the 2016 election.

If Mifsud was a Russian spy, it’s unclear why after Papadopoulos’ July 27, 2017 arrest that no U.S. intelligence officials warned their European partners that they were hosting a foreign agent on their territory.

Mifsud met with many senior British politicians, even after the FBI knew of the Downer conversations, and had interviewed Papadopoulos under oath. Mifsud met Alok Sharma, then a Foreign Office minister for Asia/Pacific, and now minister of state for employment, “a couple of times” at least, including at a fundraiser Oct. 19, two weeks after Papadopoulos’ Oct. 5 guilty plea.

At that same fundraiser, Mifsud was photographed next to Boris Johnson, the UK foreign secretary, the most senior intelligence official responsible for running MI6, the UK’s foreign intelligence service, and Government Communications Headquarters, the UK equivalent of America’s National Security Agency.

The office of the special counsel, Robert Mueller, declined to comment when asked if it alerted the UK government about Mifsud after Papadopoulos’s arrest. British government agencies did not comment about whether the UK had been warned by its U.S. partners about Mifsud before the foreign secretary and other senior politicians mingled with an alleged Russian agent.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/26/the_maltese_phantom_of_russiagate_.html

Why? Because it's yet another pack of lies in a collapsing cover up of the Corrupt Obama Administration's Illegal Spying on American Citizens.

 

Obama weaponized The Deep State against The American People to a far greater extent than either of them.

We now know that the Obama gang used an informant, the absence of any information from Halper, or other informants, to justify the application for the FISA warrants means that the informant did not provide any credible information about Russian "collusion" to be included in the FISA applications. If the informant had any information worth relaying, that information would have been leaked to the New York Times and other news outlets for Mueller's office – and been included in the FISA applications for the warrants.

Since the Obama DOJ knew that the informant did not provide any credible information about Russian "collusion," they had a solemn duty to disclose this to the FISA court when they were requesting spy authority on Americans, because the absence of credible information from an informant embedded in the Trump campaign contradicts the unreliable information in the Steele dossier, but, The Corrupt Obama Administration and later the Obama Holdovers Deliberately Concealed This from the FISA Court.

Halper was run at the Trump campaign to report to the Obama FBI-DOJ any evidence of Russian "collusion."

Brennan, Crapper, and Comey are trying to distract from the fact that Halper, and others, did not report any useful information. The Obama DOJ hid from the FISA court that it had an informant inside the Trump campaign who did not report any information to justify a warrant. The absence of such information from the administration's informant contradicts and weakens the reliability and credibility of the salacious and unverified Steele dossier as a basis for the warrant.

The informant did not see or hear anything that supports the Russia "collusion" because there was no Russia collusion. The Obama DOJ hid this from the FISA court.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...the_informant_spy_whatever.html#ixzz5HCVpbb1F

 

That could work. The USG probably needs something like the DOJ, but not a cabinet department.

 

These are VERY PROSPEROUS thieves.


FBI Stonewalls Release of 16 Pages of Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Meeting Docs AGAIN

 

It's very curious how so much of this story -- the parts that are still hidden by the CIA and FBI -- took place in foreign countries where the CIA was permitted to do all sorts of things that it could not do in America.

The bridge to the Russia investigation wasn't erected in Moscow during the summer of the 2016 election.

It originated earlier, 1,700 miles away in London, where foreign figures contacted Trump campaign advisers and provided the FBI with hearsay allegations of Trump-Russia collusion, bureau documents and interviews of government insiders reveal. These contacts in spring 2016 -- some from trusted intelligence sources, others from Hillary Clinton supporters -- occurred well before FBI headquarters authorized an official counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016.

The new timeline makes one wonder: Did the FBI follow its rules governing informants?

Here's what a congressman and an intelligence expert think.

"The revelation of purposeful contact initiated by alleged confidential human sources prior to any FBI investigation is troublesome," Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), an ally of President Trump and chairman of a House subcommittee that’s taking an increasingly aggressive oversight role in the scandal, told me. "This new information begs the questions: Who were the informants working for, who were they reporting to and why has the [Department of Justice] and FBI gone to such great lengths to hide these contacts?"

Kevin Brock agrees that Congress has legitimate questions. The retired FBI assistant director for intelligence supervised the rewriting of bureau rules governing sources, under then-director Robert Mueller a decade ago. Those rules forbid the FBI from directing a human source to target an American until a formally predicated investigative file is opened.

Brock sees oddities in how the Russia case began. "These types of investigations aren't normally run by assistant directors and deputy directors at headquarters," he told me. "All that happens normally in a field office, but that isn't the case here and so it becomes a red flag. Congress would have legitimate oversight interests in the conditions and timing of the targeting of a confidential human source against a U.S. person."

Other congressional and law enforcement sources express similar concerns, heightened by FBI communications suggesting political pressures around the time the probe officially opened.

According to documents and government interviews, one of the FBI's most senior counterintelligence agents visited London the first week of May 2016.​

Peter Strzok

Congress never got the FBI to explain that trip -- but, soon after it, one of the most consequential moments of the scandal occurred: On May 10, Australian diplomat Alexander Downer met in a London bar with Trump adviser George Papadopoulos, who boasted of knowing that Russia would release dirt on Clinton.

That contact was not immediately reported to U.S. intelligence.

By early June, a second overture to a Trump campaign adviser occurred in London. In a "Dear Carter" email, a Cambridge University graduate student invited Trump campaign adviser Carter Page to attend a popular July security conference in London.
​

I think it's becoming more obvious that this plot was hatched by Comrade Brennan, who used CIA assets to spy on Trump in order to get Lying Comey to open an official investigation -- which Brennan (and Crooked Hillary) desperately wanted, so they could respond to attacks about the Email Investigation with the statement, "Trump's being investigated too!"

 

More comes out almost on a daily basis. This entire plot is going to be exposed.

Libs can't put the toothpaste back in the tube.

 

The FBI/DOJ/CIA has a long history of committing felonies to suppress opponents of the corrupt ruling political class.

"Operating inside the Panthers, the FBI planted "snitch jackets" on militant members, inviting other Panthers to attack them for having "informed" to the police. The FBI also created dissension among the Panthers and claimed success for provoking at least four instances of assault by one militant black activist against another." The Lawless State, The Crimes of the U.S. Intelligence Agencies, Morton H. Halperin, Jerry J. Bermin, Robert L. Borosage, and Christine M. Marwick, Penguin Books, NY, 1977. p. 125.

It used to bother the Left.

 

They also claimed when caught spying on MLK that they "spied on him to protect him." Same load of crap they are trying to sell us after being caught spying on Trump! Do you remember about a year ago their faux outrage when Trump called them out for spying on him?

 

Yes, and our Secret Police have been pulling this crap and rigging the system for a very long time.

"FBI reports on Ralph Abernathy, Coretta King, Seymour Hersh, Sammy Davis, Jr., Cesar Chavez, and others we're transmitted in thousands of dispatches sent to the Justice Department and fed into IDIU computers for storage and analysis. The FBI and the Justice Department provided information to the IRS for its "enemies project." The FBI sent its information to the CIA, the Secret Service, and Military Intelligence. They in turn, sent information to the bureau. By 1972, the intelligence agencies of the government, with the FBI at the center, had placed the political left and a large part of the Democratic party under surveillance." The Lawless State, The Crimes of the U.S. Intelligence Agencies, Morton H. Halperin, Jerry J. Bermin, Robert L. Borosage, and Christine M. Marwick, Penguin Books, NY, 1977. p. 124.

 

And now The Left is doing the same.

 

It's beyond Left and Right - it's The Deep State.

“While restraint such as these have come and gone over the past half century, a more formal and enduring body of curbs on political and social movements in opposition to the status quo has flourished in the form of a system of political intelligence immune to changes in political climate, judicial scrutiny, executive or congressional control. Largely extralegal, autonomous, and clandestine, this political police system has monitored dissent with ever increasing intensity since the end of World War I.”
The Age of Surveillance, The Aims and Methods of America's Political intelligence System, Frank J. Donner, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York, 1980. p. 3.

 

That's a packed quote.

In the American System, Conservatives, Conserve American Liberal Democracy, our fundamental commitment to INDIVIDUAL liberty. There can be no totalitarian authority by an insulated minority in such a system, so on US soil all such movements are Leftwing, and have no currency among the Right.