Final Behghazi Report Details Administration Failures

Perfect example of how the left will handle the truth. You need'nt say anymore.

 

Anyways... So by that logic, this won't be boring when ABC, NBC, and CBS run it. Do you disagree or will you continue to deflect and move goal posts?

 

So ......denial sets in. Dude what we have been saying all along we now find out WAS TRUE. Accept it.

 

So you agree it was over a Youtube video and Hillary didn't lie about that?

 

Partisan hacks like you have been saying that since day one, but that doesn't change the fact that Shillary, and the Obama admin royally (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up in Libya.

 

Whatever you do, don't discuss the various politicized talking points that have definitively been debunked now. Good move.

 

And here you have it folks. After years of following steps one and two in the Democratic "When the sit hits the fan" play book. Its on to step three after the first two didn't work.

Anyone wondering, the steps are as follows.

1) deny, deny, deny.

2) deflect, deflect, deflect.

3) If ever found out, after years of step one and two, call it old news and move along.

 

Might as well count on these same posters to deny this entire thing, regardless of facts. They'll never admit her corruption to your face or to this forum. That, you can believe.

 

Some things have certainly been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Failed leadership, and Lying to cover it up.


Hillary Clinton has 0 business seeking a promotion.

 

Ahhh they final report did not set out to do that but rather to display the facts and let YOU make up your mind and the fact is it is devastating for Clinton and the administration and that their first concern was how to spin that they were actually meeting DURING the attack and discussing how they would spin it. This after hundreds of request for additional security which they ignored. She clearly failed the CnC test.

- - - Updated - - -

Facts aren't spin.

 

In case it went over your head the Email scandal and the Benghzi scandal are two entirely different matters although the committee proceedings have been held up for months because of the Email scandal and the NYT pulled the emails to the front burner.

 

OMG, how blatantly dishonest.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0
The report, however, did not dispute that United States military forces stationed in Europe could not have reached Benghazi in time to rescue the personnel who died — a central finding of previous inquiries.

 

Never mind the 800+ cables sent the previous months, asking for more security and firepower. And the NY Times is as bad as Salon and Think Progress these days, they hire biased journalists that don't feel the truth is necessary. Using them as a source isn't credible anymore.

 

So, what you are saying is, there is nothing new here to see, according to their 800 page report that hasn't already been gone over before. There is no smoking gun according to this link; http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/be...ations/ar-AAhIHbg?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout

 

How soon republicans forget that on the night of the attack, their candidate came out and blamed Obama and Hillary for "allowing" four americans to die. He made some rather pointed "political comments" IN THE ALMOST COMPLETE ABSENCE OF INFORMATION.

Nah, it was the Democrats that launched 20 or so "investigations", it was the dems that continue to claim Hilary lied and americans died, despite the obvious chronological stupidity of that particular bumpersticker.

Yep, It sure does tell everyone everything you need to know about Benghazi itself, not to mention certain republicans.

 

You of course have a link proving this right?

- - - Updated - - -

It does? What proof do you have of corruption?

 

When Trey Gowdy and Kevin McCarthy got caught trying to frame Clinton for political gain, that ended Benghazi. It left the party with no credibility after that, and they knew it. And this is the result. A big fat nothing and $7 million dollars down the toilet we paid for so they could have their witch hunt. Really pathetic!

 

So what's different in this report? What separates this report from the other 7?

What stands out enough that it justified the time and money spent to continue the Republican trainwreck of an investigation?

 

When over 200 Marines were killed in Lebanon saint Ronnie The B Movue Actor was in charge I did not recall the Democrats chanting Ronnie Lied Marines Died. But Ronnie did screw up by letting them be sitting ducks there but that,s ok because Ronnie was a saint and could do no wrong because he was from Holliwood.

 

What lie?

 

Nothing better in the morning than some deflection, and a hot cop of Joe.

 

I remember that. Ronnie blamed the whole thing on a youtube video and then went back to eating jelly beans.........

 

They don't have to. The report didn't find anything. The military said they didn't have enough intelligence and Hillary didn't prevent them from going in, which has been the alleged claim; http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/be...ations/ar-AAhIHbg?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout

 

so the other seven reports laid out how everyone sat around for two hours trying to figure out what uniform ours guys should wear, if they were allowed to go help?

 

If your hateful conclusion decided that they let them die, which the military said otherwise, then you are just left with your hateful unsubstantiated opinion. And that is worth (*)(*)(*)(*).