Freddie Gray Arresting Officer Edward Nero Found Not Guilty On All Charges

He CAUSED it to happen by his own misadventure. He did PURPOSELY do it.

Moot point that is not the claim.

Those experts are making statements which have nothing to do with anything they are mistakenly stating the defense is Grey tried to break his own neck. That is NOT what the defense or anyone claims. It is totally specious. The forensics expert testified that the death occurred when he fell, after he managed to get himself standing, and breaking his neck in the fall hitting his head in the metal bench.

The fact is the city acted stupidly and in haste and should never have paid a dime to the family. And what they did has no merit in' the prosecutions

BTW a Georgetown law professor has moved to ha e her disbarred for these meritless prosecutions.

 

It expert say he could not have done it. I sourced it. Hence it's the fault lies at the local government. They admitted to the guilt by settling it with a multi million plea deal. While you sourced nothing, and are making it up that he did it by himself. lol

It's bloody well is the claim. You just don't like what you read, cause it proves you're wrong.
Bohoo... lol

They are making direct comments on Grey's case.
You, as a nobody posting anonymously on the internet, are not in any position to push this all under the rug.

You're not backing up your opinion with an argument or source.
You're just disagreeing it. Who cares what your opinion is. lol
I don't.

 

The expert said he could not PURPOSELY break his own neck by banging his head but that is not what is claimed. He did it by his own misadventure, do you even know what that means. Again you present this canard, it is not claimed he did it purposely to himself what don't you understand. And what are you laughing about it's not a very funny subject.

Not it is not what is claimed. Your experts are saying he could not PURPOSELY break his own neck. That is NOT what happened, he fell by accident but an accident of which he place himself in danger.

And you better check your dates on their statements which are based on speculation and conjecture and not the facts as presented in court.

And I am backing mine with the evidence as presented in court, in three trials now.

There is no evidence anyone else caused him to have a broken neck from which he died.

 

Nope. You claimed something, but you're absolutely not able to proof it's possible.
I got an expert saying you can't break your own neck.
End of story, until you can proof it.

As if you can fall 3 stories in a car. You need to found your opinion with a source. And you haven't. You're the one speculating here.

Kangaroo courts, since the prosecutor normally works closely with the people she is now forced to attempt to convict.

 

I have no obligation to prove something that did not happen is possible.

He did not PURPOSELY break his neck as the experts claim is impossible to do although if I jump off the roof of my house I sure could, or hung myself I sure could.

They do not claim that falling and hitting your head against a metal bench on the way down is an impossible way to break your neck.

OK, that's not what happened so it's a moot point.

Don't need 3 stories.

How exactly are you claiming it happened then and what is the evidence. How DID his neck get broken?

His death was caused by his own misadventure, do you even know what that means?

So you can stop with the canard, about "own purpose", that has never been claimed especially by the defense.

 

I got an expert saying it's not possible to do it on purpose. So I'm not buying your opinion that it did happen by accident. Not with nothing to back it up. So your argument is trashed until you can walk the walk.

Expert just did.

I don't need to say how it happened. I got an expert saying it's not possible.
Hence the government caved in, and settled this by paying millions in damages.

That a friend of the police is unable to convict a policeman personally in her kangaroo court is totally besides the point.

 

Non-sequitur. There is no claim be did it on purpose.

When you can stop with that canard get back to me.

 

You claimed this "He CAUSED it to happen by his own misadventure. He did PURPOSELY do it." over and over.
And the medical experts said it's impossible. You got nothing but that silly opinion debunked by medical experts.

 

Are you just being obtuse or what, he didn't PURPOSELY do it, but it was cause by his own misadventure. If I step back over a cliff I didn't purposely kill myself but I died of my own misadventure. If I jump off the railroad trestle and hit a submerged log killing myself, I did not purposely kill myself, but I died of my own misadventure.

Grey didn't purpose kill himself, no matter that no one can state it would be impossible but that is of no matter, but he died as a result of his own misadventure.

There was no crime, all charges dropped now.

 

Hmmm from her press conference today

"“Unlike with other cases where prosecutors work closely with the police to investigate what actually occurred, what we realized very early on in this case was police investigating police, whether they’re friends or merely their colleagues, was problematic. ”"

That's why they did their own.

Care to revise you assertions now?

 

The experts say you can't do that on purpose.
So if you can't do it on purpose it rules out by misadventure.
obviously

- - - Updated - - -

Nope.
They call this "police investigating police, whether they’re friends or merely their colleagues, was problematic"

 

Why do you keep repeating that canard?

They are mutually exclusive. Perhaps you would do yourself well to look up the meaning on death by misadventure.

Well she just flushed it down the toilet for you.