Gadsden Mall Manager: Judge Roy Moore Was Not Banned from Mall

^ Thread win #2.

 

Exactly, just like Democrats elected a RAPIST, LYING POS (like Clinton) to the White House not once, but twice THEN tried to elect his LYING, CORRUPT POS wife to the same office.

 

Pssssst...

Bill wasn't running in 2016 - that was Hillary!

I know the pantsuits can be confusing...

 

So you know that empty late election cycle slander doesn't work anymore - why keep doing it? Anger management therapy?

 

Disagreed, but I do find it curious that he made less than a completely affirmative statement.

 

Moore's bipartisan enemies clearly hate his guts.
Would you be eager to speak up enthisiastically for the target of a Hate Rally?

 

Actually, we just wait for the opponants to disgrace themselves!

 

So what "Democrat" ideals does Moore hold?

 

I'd speak up for what I believe to be true. **** what everyone else thinks.

 

You are not the norm.

 

Moore is a Kennedy brother?

 

Unfortunately, you are probably correct. Is that because about 98% of the population doesn't join the military?

 

None. That is probably why he joined the RP. Now he knows the the RP is rather like the DP.

 

He aspires no doubt.

 

Those who join the military take up arms for their nation and people. It requires a level of uncommon virtue.
Most people will be reluctant to stand up publicly to loud organized activists.

 

They also say factual reporting is high. I can't even bring myself to entertain such a troll post. The worst part is that he probably even believes that.

 

I'd rather see proof that something even happened. We've still yet to see that but somehow find ourselves forced to prove he didn't do it.

 

Agreed....except in the voting booth. Most people vote their conscience.

 

Being sexually assaulted was more personal for the women, so they probably remember things more vividly than the mall manager. They also would have had vastly different perspectives on Moore's behaviors.

I think we can be suspicious of the timing of the WaPo story because… politics. That certainly doesn't mean the four original women from the WaPo article and the 30 corroborating witnesses shouldn't be believed because it was long ago. Traumatic experiences tend to be memorable.

 

Dammit - I agree.

 

I don't know, that was a while back. If he was a Democrat, then he must have had Democrat ideals. Besides, it's fun thinking about all the Dems that read about it holding their breath until they turn blue while they wait for this to blow over. It's funny.

 

The man who would know, mall manager, categorically stated Roy Moore was NOT banned from the mall.
His common English language qualifier, to my knowledge, allows for the possibility of error in remembering something that happened forty years ago without granting there is error in his recollection. Capiche?

Hang on real tight to your clenched fists of straws however. As soon as Gloria Allred releases her client's yearbook to have Moore's signature verified (What's that? She isn't letting a third party vet Moore's alleged signature?) ....Oh, ummm, never mind.

Just as you want to condemn this man based on your vast knowledge of what happened in Alabama forty years ago. Right? Just put your faith in proven liars like the Washington Post and Gloria Allred and all will be well.

 

Dude, "to my knowledge" is not a "categorically" stated claim Moore wasn't banned since he qualified it with "to my knowledge".

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/categorical
:absolute, unqualified

• a categorical denial

 

No, they do this a lot because seeing it's Breitbart they don't even bother to read it because they know it's B.S. Sorry to disappoint.

 

Okay. I withdraw the word categorically and replace it with the word emphatically. The former Alabama mall manager emphatically declared Roy Moore had never been banned from his mall for lusting after young girls. It all amounts to a denial in any case.