Gadsden Mall Manager: Judge Roy Moore Was Not Banned from Mall

Dude.

Fallacy.

 

I'd go with somewhat not unstrongly, or with essentially minimal noticeable trepidation...

 

Agreed it's a denial, but it means no more than those who claim he was banned.

IMHO, such things aren't totally fabricated, only exaggerated such as "he was asked to leave and not come back since some girls were uncomfortable with his advances". Not that he did anything wrong, but that it appeared odd and those there didn't want problems.

In the end, it'd be better if a parent or one of the girls from the mall came forward. If not, it's just "He said/she said".

 

That's what we've been trying to tell liberals since this entire fake news driven election tampering sage started.

NO EVIDENCE AGAINST MOORE!

Yearbook fake, mall ban fake, accusations fake.

After a high ranking Hillary inner circle Democrat went to jail for kiddy diddling, another one on trial as we speak, countless Hollywood bigwigs being accused of pervert behavior, the left was facing yet another serious image problem.

I mean lets be honest here, its been a pretty rough year for the left.

Their rioting over Trump's win showing their bigotry, their attacks on monuments and anthem kneeling showing their hatred of America, their constant insipid non-stop whining and crying over wahhhhhhh Russia wahhhhh showing their lack of common sense and reason, and their absolute opposition to MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN showing their contempt for their fellow Americans.

America, and the world, has been seeing the left for what it truly is: a hateful plague.

But WaPo noticed something.

With all that going down in Hollywood, WaPo realized just how hyped into a frenzy the masses were over sex based finger pointing.

And with the dual threats of their image problems and a critical Senate seat on the line, WaPo weaponized the sexual accusation trend.

This entire thing was manufactured.

It has no proof, no evidence, no facts, and no truth.

It was 100% designed, bought and paid for by WaPo with possible/likely cooperation with DNC entities.

Take an objective look at the playing field, the timing, the lack of transparency, the lack of any supporting evidence, the debunked attempts at evidence, and the DNC's absolutely hypocritical standards for Moore vs Franken.

Anyone with a respect for logic and honesty knows this is nothing but a pack of leftist fake news lies.

 

No evidence against Harvey or Cosby either, amirite?

 

Yes. Only two people know the truth and they both say something different.
In my opinion it looks bad that lawyer Gloria Allred will not allow the yearbook to be be evaluated at Moore's request by a third party, however

Agreed.
The voters in Alabama will make up a jury in this case and it's the only one that matters.

 

I ignored the Cosby saga entirely, as for Harvey as far as I know its all accusations - unless something new has come out I'm not aware of.

 

Yes, just like Bill Clinton. The only thing they had on him was perjury about lawful blowjobs from Monica. There is no evidence of his alleged rapes and sexual harassment of women....except for "he said/she said", so all those RWers who call Bill a "rapist" are no better than the LWers saying the same thing about Moore.

That said, I think all of these ****ers are guilty, but that's just me. Alabamians are free to elect pedophiles and rapists to represent them.....which is about right.

 

Well, let’s be fair. Saying he wasn’t banned from a mall, even assuming it is true, doesn’t prove that.

 

Breitbart is not a news source. They are not in the news business.

 

No kidding.

Breitbart is in the COMEDY business.

Obviously, they can't be taken seriously as a "source" for anything.

It is a good thing that nobody (repeat NOBODY) actually believes the brain diarrhea that Breitbart spews.

Breitbart as a "source"?

 

Just like Rachel Maddow or Keith Olbermann. They're all comedians in the Infotainment business.

 

ROY MOORE’S GONNA WIN, ISN’T HE? Democrat Doug Jones: The Second Amendment Has ‘Limitations.’

 

Odds are, he will win but it's all up to Alabamian voters. Whether he stays in his seat or not remains to be seen.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-roy-moore-could-lose-alabamas-senate-race/
...Alabama’s demographics make the Democratic path to victory there extremely difficult. About 35 percent of Alabama residents are white evangelicals, a group that overwhelmingly votes for Republicans, and that’s a much larger share of the population than we see in the U.S. as a whole (17 percent). About 19 percent of Americans nationally live in what the U.S. Census defines as rural areas (which tend to lean heavily Republican), but 41 percent of Alabama residents live in these areas. Adults with at least a college degree, a Democratic-leaning bloc, accounted for just 32 percent of Alabama voters in 2016, compared to 40 percent nationally, according to Census figures.

But it’s not just a Republican-leaning state; Alabama’s electorate is also deeply polarized along both partisan and racial lines. In other words, the state has very few swing voters — voters who don’t reliably pick one party or the other and who might be swayed by, for example, the national political environment or what’s in the news. The state’s electorate is about 71 percent white and 26 percent black, with small numbers of other groups (e.g. Asians and Latinos). In 2012, the most recent election for which we have reliable figures on how different demographic groups voted in Alabama, Barack Obama won an estimated 94 percent of the black vote in that state, compared to just 16 percent of the white vote. (He won about 41 percent of the white vote nationally.) And it’s doubtful that Obama’s dismal showing among white voters was purely a result of his race, since Hillary Clinton lost by an even larger overall margin in the state in 2016 than Obama did in 2008 and 2012....

 

Because no one knows how they vote.

 

Moore will probably win. Compared to any corrupt establishment politician Moore is the only viable choice.
Moore is as anti-establishment as it gets at the moment.

 

As compared to Carlos Slim's NYT and Jeff Bezos' Washington Post? They are all the same - biased news sources.

 

There was probably enough evidence to indict Clinton if it had ever been presented to a grand jury.

“So who else did Broaddrick talk to?

Three of her friends tell NBC News she told them about the alleged incident at the time: Susan Lewis...

Susan Lewis: “It was very traumatic for her.”

Louise Ma...

Myers: “Did you urge her to report it?”

Louise Ma: “No.”

Myers: “Why not?”

Louise Ma: “Because women were made victims at the time. And you know what the courts were like in that time period. It was always the woman’s fault.”

And Jean Darden, the sister of Norma Kelsey, the woman who says she saw Juanita at the hotel.

Both admit they have a serious reason not to like Bill Clinton — in 1981 as governor, Clinton commuted the life sentence of their father’s killer, making him eligible for parole.

The stories her friends tell from 20 years ago are consistent — and Broaddrick herself says she recalls many details.” Clinton Rapist Dateline NBC Transcript, Lisa Meyers, NBC News. [Transcript taken from: “Clinton “in fact” raped Juanita” Wall Street Journal piece, Feb. 19, 1999]
http://shadowgov.com/Clinton/DNBCJuanitaTranscript.html

Nevertheless, it is important to remember that as compared to other presidents, Bill Clinton was one of the better ones.
Broaddrick decided not to press charges and Clinton was reelected based on his record in office, and the Senate refused to remove him from office. Both decisions seem valid to me.

 

Harvey confessed to the essentials on the record. Weinstein is a well done turkey.

 

His views are much closer to mainstream Alabama than his left-wing abortion extremist opponent.

 

Have you seen how badly the case against him has fallen apart? Gloria Allred should investigated to see if she should be disbarred.

 

Done, yes, but I don't recall him confessing to rape or anything other than "inappropriate".

 

I welcome all investigations into anyone doing anything illegal, corrupt or other malfeasance.

 

Was he the mall manger 40 years ago or the current manager?n

 

What a load of self serving bullshit! "reason for his behavior".