Gazan arab muslims protesting in large numbers

Absolutely not... Its didactic literature not science or history..

The Hebrews wrote laws, rituals and history to distinguish themselves from the other Canaanites.. Archeology has demolished their version of history.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes.. Most were socialists.. They used to have marches and fight with each other circa 1920... The poor Palestinians had never heard of Lenin and Marx.

 

Is the Koran historically accurate?

Anyway

Archeology Proves Bible History Accurate
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/1912.24.78.0/religion/christianity/archeology-proves-bible-history-accurate

 

The Jews borrowed from Egypt, Sumer and Ugarit sources.. Muslims borrowed from the Jews.

There is no archeological support for the Bible stories.. There was no worldwide flood and no Exodus.. No battles of Joshua..

There is simply not a shred of evidence unless you believe Ron Wyatt and his camera always failed.

 

I just gave you some

 

That's not evidence of a worldwide flood... nor of the Exodus.. Egypt controlled both Sinai and Palestine at the time of the so-called Exodus and Jewish scholars have know for decades that it was a morality tale NOT history. There was NO parting of the Red Sea.. Joshua didn't destroy any Canaanite cities.. many have been excavated and there is NO sign life was disrupted.. Those cities were involved in pottery making. mining and metallurgy and paid tribute to Pharaoh.

Palestine was POOR, arid and stony.. They couldn't support large armies or large populations.

Noah's Ark is borrowed from Sumer and basically is about a 4 day flood in the Euphrates River Basin that washed some barges carrying beer, livestock and grain downriver..

 

I didnt say it was but its proof the bible is accurate on many things. All religions are based on history as your proving even the flood which was story from long before the bible

Yes it was in the early 1900s until the Jews changed it

 

Jewish people are rarely stupid and they value education.. They know that these tales are teaching narratives about disobedience, redemption etc, but they aren't history.

 

All of them ? There were no kings of Israel its just a story?

 

Kings of a tiny impoverished city state that was usually under the thumb of some Empire.

 

Fascinating. The Muslims and Jews accept the Scriptures as historical fact.

 

Actually .. Jews don't and neither do educated Muslims...

I visited an interactive geology display of the Arabian Peninsula at King Abdulaziz University.

It showed the activity of tectonic plates.. the widening of the Red Sea, the tilting eastward of al Hasa and so on.. with a brass plate at each station with the creation account.

The stories have a purpose but they are not a record of history.

 

So there were no Hittites ?

 

Of course there were Hittites, but there was no Exodus, no worldwide flood etc... They rarely even got the geography right.. and the scripture is full of anachronisms.

- - - Updated - - -

Of course there were Hittites, but there was no Exodus, no worldwide flood etc... They rarely even got the geography right.. and the scripture is full of anachronisms.

- - - Updated - - -

Of course there were Hittites, but there was no Exodus, no worldwide flood etc... They rarely even got the geography right.. and the scripture is full of anachronisms.

 

So how do you know what parts are real and what are stories? This has been debated for centuries and more and more proof keeps surfacing that the bible is right on many historical matters.

Im not trying to claim there is proof of everything in the bible as many are parables

 

Summerians,.. one of the worlds oldest to even the oldest civilization who had cities and a written language left behind a lot of things. And it's rather easy to spot the similarities between their religion and the Abrahamic religions. The Papyrus Ipuwer has a lot in common with Exodus, from rivers turning to blood to the massacre of innocent children. Exodus was also rather ripped of from Enuma Elish. The wisdom of Solomon... rather the same as Amenemope.


Fun fact. It is said that Abraham came from Ur. Ur was a Sumerian city state.
If Abraham existed than he would have known Sumerian religion.

 

No. It is illegal to retain any territory gained through war irrespective of whether it is aggressive or defensive. I took you off ignore because you're such a charming guy and I couldn't deprive myself of your erudition.

 

Who obligated them? The law did-the law which by becoming signatory to the UN Charter they were bound to observe.

 

...including the Palestine Post, a paper founded by a Jew, now the Jerusalem Post.

 

Who but a zealot would? There is little substantiated fact in the Bible-particularly important to remember considering that none of the Bible was written contemporaneously with alleged events, but only many decades later. Memories dim, stories become distorted and exaggerated over time leaving the Bible, with a few exceptions, as being generally unreliable as a historical document. The Old Testament is even more suspect given both the time period over which it was written and that there was very little of anything which we know today as 'writing'. Most stories were handed down through the centuries by word of mouth- a bit like what American kids know as the 'telephone game'.

 

This is obviously wrong since there would be nothing to stop a country from attacking another; it could do so repeatedly and not suffer any consequences. That should be obvious to any thinking person. Further proof is here:

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/media/user/documents/Israel Wars.pdf

The fact is that you took me off ignore because you have much to learn from my posts, not the other way around.

When are you going to admit you lied when you claimed I said the pal arabs were thrown out of all arab countries?

 

No, it is not wrong. Try some reading comprehension; it is illegal to retain territory gained through war. What you responded with is irrelevant. Any "thinking person" would see that.

 

Obviously being obligated to the UN is a joke just like international law

- - - Updated - - -

Then why do they still have it ? Better tell that to Russia

- - - Updated - - -

Then the Arabs should not have attacked Israel over and over and then when they lose have people like you wanting back what they lost

 

Israel isn't the problem. The Islamist terrorists who use the Palestinians as pawns is the problem.

 

Obviously this is the attitude of Israel and her supporters.

Do not expect the West to always be ruled by such lawless people who will support this.

 

Also of the US, Russia and China and any other power worth its salt even N Korea and Iran

Dont ever expect us to turn our backs on Israel for some Muslim terrorists