Global Warming Study Ship Stuck in Ice

In fact, I've just discovered you're outright lying. The OP's own story identifies it as an exploration vessel, and says it has both scientists and passengers on board. There is nothing to suggest it is a "global warming study vessel". You just made that up.

 

The East Anglia email leak proves PRECISELY the opposite= why it was called "Climategate".

They not only FALSIFIED DATA, they omitted complete datasets that did not support their "pre-desired" conclusions, as well as corrupted the peer-review process to excude, discredit, any dissenting voices whatsoever.

Of course, when they "investigated' THEMSELVES, they saw "no problems" with these revelations.

Unfortunately for them, the cat was already out of the bag, and NO SENTIENT BEING accepts their ridiculous attempts to exonerate their own corruption and deceit.

This , in addition to the "open mike" gaffe of the Copenhagen "Summit" (Aka: Big Ass Party), where the leading delegate was caught explaining that the AGW scam had "nothing to do with the climate", but was "about evening the playing field", exposing the entire SCAM for the UN/World Socialist INCOME REDISTRIBUTION SCHEME it has ALWAYS BEEN.

The Warmist Cabal has ZERO credibility,which is why they are now, so desperately trying to throw as much crap at the walls as they can, to try to get at least SOME of the Gravy Train, rolling again.


Where you been?

The Warmist Religion is DEAD. You guys just don't know it yet. Have fun doing this:

 

Um...it is the OP's title. Really dude. Give up.

 

You do realise that putting it in caps lock won't make it any more true, right? There is a 97 percent consensus among climatologists who are actively publishing that human activity is directly and negatively impacting the environment.

Who do you think I'm going to go with here, buddy? 97 percent of professional experts, or the Alex Jones fan on the internet?

 

Why would I give up when I've just proven you are lying? Show me proof of your claim (lie) that this was a "global warming study vessel" or shut up.

 

You do realize that you pretending it DIDN'T HAPPEN, will not make Climategate go away, don't you?

There is nothing NEAR a 97% consensus,and "consensus" is not proof. SCIENTIFIC METHOD is the ONLY MEANS by which scientific proof is established. Period.

"Consensus" is MEANINGLESS in science.

There used to be UNIVERSAL "consensus" that the Earth was flat; they were WRONG, too.

 

I'll type slowly for you, as I realize you're a liberal. I also realize that the information many are providing is a frontal assault on your religion, and that you're extremely sensitive about it.

I got the information that this was a global warming study vessel from the OP's post.

 

What, because they don't talk in the way the right wing lunatics talk you think it is a conspiracy.....yeah...

 

Read the CNN article linked to in the OP:


The Russian expedition ship is carrying scientists and passengers led by an Australian climate change professor, but they all may have to wait two more days for one or all three icebreakers to free it, said Capt. Wang Jiangzhong of the Snow Dragon .



Der.....it's like boxing a baby, I swear....

 

Not long after being schooled in reality the insults start......

 

Umm...their OWN LEAKED EMAILS exposed the OBVIOUS, CLEAR CONSPIRACY of the East Anglia Warmist aristocracy/IPCC, to further their deceit for profit, regardless of the empirical data.

I love how the Warmist Deluded keep trying to pretend that Climategate, ONE and TWO, "never happened", or that everyone has "forgotten".

 

lolwut?

Do you find it odd that the MSM reports of this stuck vessel happened to leave out the purpose of the expedition when reported on the Nightly News?

BTW...just for Quantum:

Yes...I'm sure...JUST SURE...that this lead climatologist is trying to prove that the climate is changing for completely natural and normal reasons.

AMIRITE?

Ecolosers.

 

And how do you suggest 97 percent of climate scientists reached their consensus? By playing tiddlywinks or by using the scientific method?

On the contrary, when there is a consensus among scientists we know that the initial results have been reproduced, confirmed, and that the hypothesis is correct.

No there didn't. You will find that to be a myth.

 

The depths of delusion are stunning. I mentioned that I hadn't heard that this was a vessel studying climate change in ANY of the Nightly News reports I had watched. Not one. I was told I was lying about it being a vessel studying that subject, even though the OP's article confirms it. I then posted a germane line.

I think you're getting better at ignoring reality. Is that an insult, liberal?

 

more likely because they realize how hilarious the story is, almost as funny as the Global Warming protests canceled because of ice and blizzards link I posted earlier

 

I have already read the article. Now please explain how the quoted sentence makes it a "global warming research vessel". Nowhere does it say its sole purpose is to study global warming. In fact, if you look at the left hand column next to the story, it states that the ship is also carrying tourists.

I would greatly appreciate it if you would stop making up your own information and then self-qualifying it as fact.

 

same way that 100% of the Ford dealers surveyed think Ford is the best auto on the market

 

Move the goalposts, after your smackdown, did we?


Who said that it's "sole purpose" was global warming? The Scientific group is BEING LED by a WARMIST professor.

Stop embarassing yourself with such silly attempts to backpedal, and deny the OBVIOUS.

It's the "consensus" of nearly all of the people posting on this thread, that is it a climate change ship.

There; that should be all the "convincing" you need...der..

 

Since they interviewed the lead climatologist - and not the tourists - I think I'll just let our conclusions stand in stark contrast to the idiocy contained in your posts.

Ecolosers.

 

reading comprehension for 1000 Alex

next to last paragraph in link in OP

 

You are saying that 97 percent of scientists work for Ford?

Permit me to view that comment with the bemused contempt it deserves.

 

Bullcrap, on all counts.

First of all, "97% of scientists" NEVER agreed on ANYTHING. Please provide the proof of that claim, or STOP MAKING IT. It is a COMPELTE FALSEHOOD,as has been proven here, many times.
PROVE IT< or RETRACT IT. Rule # 10 of this forum.

BUllcrap. When we SEE THE CONFIRMED RESULTS of tests usitlizing SCIENTIFIC METHOD., not arbitrary computer models, which even the WARMISTS had to admit were wrong, we'll knwo what's up.

"Consensus" without PROOF established through Scientific Method, and a bus token, is worth a ride downtown.

 

Recently, another thread utterly dismantled this 97% of scientists in agreement claim. Read up.

I think a new term is worth coining. People like you will hereto be known as:

ECOLYTES.

 

You're making up your own arguments and attributing them to me again. I never said no scientist has ever falsified data. I said that the IPCC and NASA, organisations which employ hundreds of scientists, are not falsifying data.

When 97 percent of climate scientists are saying one thing about the environment, and Lord Monckton is saying another, who do you think is more likely to be falsifying data?