No ! You misunderstood, President Donald Trump promised to protect Our Constipational Rights and Our Right to remain Constipated, if We so choose to do so, and the Right to refuse Exlax, if We so desire to do so. These are Our Constipational Rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constipation. Extreme Humor and Sarcasm alert...
It's not my issue, it's really your issue. It's a credibility thing. How you make things up. So why would anyone take what you say seriously? But go ahead, show how D's support communism then.
Truth be known, enough here put the same lines to Republicans too. As if any sane person could desire harm to innocents........ Simply not true.. And again for the Record I am a registered Democrat, as soon as I came of age, I have not changed. I do not follow any Political Party, I make up my own mind on all matters....
I did not start a debate and you know it. But, the anti - gunners came and what transpired? Unable to allow me the luxury of ONE SINGLE SOLITARY THREAD, all I was hearing from the resident Democrat was Pol Pot / Hitler / Stalin talking points. If Democrats don't agree, then you should tell the guy pretending to be a D to **** and let's start talking about how we could have prevented this recent spate of mass shootings. I'm not a partisan politician, so I'm not debating a damn thing. My interest is limited to finding things that we can do to stop the mass shootings without getting bogged down in this incessant B.S. that paid trolls and shills post here a thousand times a day. I've heard the arguments. I'm not debating. That is what you fail to understand.
It is not sane people that make the same argument thousands of times over and over, silencing anyone that approaches the table with a solution.
And to those hyper partisan fools, no one takes them seriously. If one wants a civil debate, one shouldn't say things like the left or right hates children and the issue isn't really about the children. That is not a statement made by one who wants to discuss anything. It's a statement to inflame.
Then there are the times if I had not been there with my sidearm, many unarmed people would have been killed, not by guns, by someone wielding edged weapons.....
Why would they do it? If they gave a rip, they would have read this thread. Here are some of my words: "The right is doing nothing except a knee jerk, defensive battle. That part whizzes me off. Then, all the right wants to do is show the weaknesses of the left's argument. That is pointless when the left is proactive. They pounce on a crisis and beat it to death. They win, incrementally, because they are willing to do something. And we do nothing." That is in my opening post "Reagan signed H.R. 4332 (in 1986 IIRC) and that gun control bill had NO effect on crime: https://www.quora.com/Did-Ronald-Re...nd-if-so-what-effect-on-gun-crime-did-it-have We had NO discussion on mental health, drugs and gun violence then... In 1989 George Bush signed legislation banning the import of semi automatic weapons. We had NO discussion regarding mental health issues, drugs, and their impact on gun violence" There was this post: "I'm a big supporter of the Fourth Amendment - enough so that I parted company with the anti-immigrant lobby on their proposed solutions on immigration. So I understand the concern." And you ignored this one: "Introduce my proposals and see if the GOP agrees to fund the ideas. If they don't, I'd back off and let the liberals ban guns outright." Then this: "I think that the reason the Republicans and Democrats do not have a discussion on the prevention of mass shooters is that they need the chaos in order to justify their existence. They are like Al Sharpton on one side and Richard Spencer on the other arguing over race. They don't want no solution. Solve the race problem and the race pimps lives would be miserable. It's beginning to look like that is the same thing with the people selling gun control v. the gun owners that don't do squat about the problem. Like the lefty said, next week a new headline will come along and everybody on this thread will forget all about Nickolas Cruz..." I'm not even half way through the thread and I've called out both sides. I've insulted them for doing nothing, but both sides let their fragile egos and politics get in the way of getting anything done. Why should you support me? You should support my effort (that does not mean agree with me) because I'm putting new ideas on the table and lives are more important than your precious feelings about the Democrats.
Why would they do it? If they gave a rip, they would have read this thread. Here are some of my words: "The right is doing nothing except a knee jerk, defensive battle. That part whizzes me off. Then, all the right wants to do is show the weaknesses of the left's argument. That is pointless when the left is proactive. They pounce on a crisis and beat it to death. They win, incrementally, because they are willing to do something. And we do nothing." That is in my opening post "Reagan signed H.R. 4332 (in 1986 IIRC) and that gun control bill had NO effect on crime: https://www.quora.com/Did-Ronald-Re...nd-if-so-what-effect-on-gun-crime-did-it-have We had NO discussion on mental health, drugs and gun violence then... In 1989 George Bush signed legislation banning the import of semi automatic weapons. We had NO discussion regarding mental health issues, drugs, and their impact on gun violence" There was this post: "I'm a big supporter of the Fourth Amendment - enough so that I parted company with the anti-immigrant lobby on their proposed solutions on immigration. So I understand the concern." And you ignored this one: "Introduce my proposals and see if the GOP agrees to fund the ideas. If they don't, I'd back off and let the liberals ban guns outright." If you cared about kids as much as you care about your fragile feelings toward Democrats, you would disavow the troll selling tyranny, get your head on straight and figure out that I'm not a partisan politician, but a guy that wants to see and end to the carnage. You don't have to like me or agree with me in order to seek out a viable solution.
I gave it a shot (no pun intended this time) to bring to people's attention the need to pass laws that would prevent mass shootings. This will, most likely, be my last post here as somebody thought I was derailing this thread because I did not babysit the individual that rules this forum. Allowing a dangerous criminal the ability to harass, intimidate, threaten and derail my thread was more important than the lives of the seventeen people in Florida and the scores to follow in preventable shootings. But the troll, like Hitler, Stalin, and Pol Pot are the type of people that will rule the world (or at least their corner of it) for short periods of time. In this case, there are debate forums... you know with rules, etc. You won't be seeing the criminal there because he would have to face me with some rules. Instead, he will continue to make monkeys out of those of you who give him the time of day. WE failed Adam Lanza, Nickolas Cruz, and a host of other children lost in this maze of egotistical bureaucrats and political propaganda prostitutes because we could not take the time to have one, single, solitary discussion of the issue without the usual suspects and their simple minded ideology that has proven to be a colossal failure. The people who are responsible for what happens from this day, forward are those with the power to censor, squelch and punish anyone who has the audacity to challenge the status quo. The question before all of you is whether you support venues where refuge is being given to those who advocate murder while getting rid of those who try to save lives. Let your conscience be your guide and watch the words that appear under my board name. This post will be deleted in the next few hours. So watch carefully.
