Hillary Tells Charles Woods "We’re going to have that person arrested . ."

If the reports are correct, she did submit to Obama to increase security. And Obama said "No". All that makes perfect sense, as we know Obama to be a narcistic political whore when it comes to creating false narratives, etc.

But now its up to Hillary. Word is she can't spill the beans now, before the election, as even though we believe Obama will lose, if she bails, she will forever be blamed by Democrats loyal to Obama for causing the loss. She hasn't the character to take the ethical high-ground.

As to military intervention once the crap hit the fan, they had limited options. But that does not provide validation to do nothing, or to even have local operatives "stand down". Lest the reminders become like a broken record, with the CIA Annex only one mile away, with full communications abilities to every important person in D.C., our Command folks were getting immediate updates as to what was going on. There was very little "fog of war" here. And Hillary ain't exactly the one to make that determination either. CIA and Military are not her command.

And besides, her assessment of such incidents is a bit "foggy" between her ears.

[video=youtube;uHVEDq6RVXc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHVEDq6RVXc[/video]

 

The CIA chain of command claims they had nothing to do with that. That leaves the order to stand down came directly from Obama, because that is the only Chain of Command over the CIA that I know about. I thought the director went straight to the President, that is how we got the "slam dunk," if the CIA is under another Chain of Command commander, separated from the president, we need to fix that quickly.

To be devils advocate, it is somewhat reasonable not not to throw more troops in to be targets, which is somewhat like Rummy with less troops than Shinseki, which I supported Rummy on; the ultimate consequence was that less troops, us not doing all the policing, meant less of our troops targets and Al Quacka killing the very Iraqi children of age to be police that they previously claimed we murdered in the first fatwa of 96.

Not throwing troops in because you are afraid our troops cannot shoot straight and identify friend from foe, and might kill those who are gawking or rioting over a video, is different than being afraid of another Cotter Pin rescue.

It is like when the Korean store owners were on the roof during a riot by MoHouse and Spellman students, and the woman was crying into the phone for help, and the black police chief in Atlanta had the police standing in a line down the street twiddling their thumbs. During another riot there is video (in real time) of one white being was dragged out of a car and spray paint sprayed down their throat, as the police did nothing and the white was left to die in the gutter by the police who were once again, within sight of the camera down the street twiddling their thumbs. What we have here is a typical liberal problem, or they did not want more targets.

 

Does anybody know if Hillary called the guy a liar yet?

 

As long as the deluded, shamed, hoodwinked people with collective insanity continue their love affair with the insane wars against Syria, Yugolsavia, Vietnam, Katanga, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, Gaza, Libya, Somalia etc. they have no right to complain about what Hilary may have said or done.
View attachment 15993

 

Thanks 80-deuce for the video

 

Sure they would. They'd blame their own bed-ridden grandmother to keep their position of power. Money follows power and that's the only thing that matters to them.....

Clinton is a pathological liar, just like Obama. She couldn't even tell the truth about how she got her NAME..... if she's going to lie about something as trivial as her name, can you imagine the whoppers she'd tell about something really serious?

Along w/Pelosi, she's one of the most soulless females in Washington.....

 

Since there has been plenty of time "10-25-2012" (now the 28th) to responded to the charge:

1) “We’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video.”

2) "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Obama)

And since 1 + 2 is consistent with:

"We reject all [Freedom of Speech] to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Obama)

Therefore, at this point I am going to consider the man who did the video a political prisoner.

The rights of the "political prisoner" are as follows:

1) Any evidence presented by the Government that he violated parole will be considered fabricated or coerced.

2) Any confession will be considered to have been coerced.

 

Pray tell ...... who agrees that the riots were caused by a film?

Those fighting your genocidal puppets in Libya detest you, your nation, your mercenaries and secret prisons and torture chambers..... a film would make no difference towards there animosity towards you and yours!

Regards
Highlander

 

A little behind the times are you? It has been stated to be, in fact a terrorist attack.

As for the film maker, he was arrested, in the middle of the night, by a SWAT team for a parole violation??? Really? a parole violation warrants a SWAT team invasion at 1:00AM? Since when?

Secondly, the guy is still in jail, without bail or a hearing until "at least after the elections".

We also know that Hillary told the father of the dead SEAL that "we are going to get this guy" (in reference to the video maker).

Since his arrest we have learned it was not in relation to his video that was released 6 months earlier, yet he still remains in jail, no bail, no bond, no hearing. Can you say political prisoner?

We now also know that there were, in fact not one, but TWO AC-130U gunships on the ground in Libya, literally minutes away and they were not allowed to respond. We also know there were, in fact not one but TWO drones overhead (one armed, one unarmed). We also know that general Hamm (commander of AFRICOM) was told to not respond and he decided he was going to anyway, but then was relived of command by the second in charge, and obama relieved Gen Hamm and replaced him with that second in command...Gen Rodriguez.

Obama has already tried to throw hillary under the bus.

This is all one big political cover up, anyone that thinks otherwise is an idiot, plain and simple.

 

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/270036.html

Too many questions too many red herrings!

The Goy are being fed some more ..... do you idiots not get fed up of the same Bull(*)(*)(*)(*)!

Regards
Highlander