Hillary Tells Charles Woods "We’re going to have that person arrested . ."

But we would have a problem with him not acting once the attack came, not providing more security when asked and by trying to normalize a hostile situation on 9/11 when anyone with any amount of common sense would know was a mistake.

 

Has Clinton rejected it yet?

 

To take further issue with the other one, it was not a "crime". It was an act of war. They attacked sovereign territory, targeting our CIA.

 

and do not forget the prior requests by the ambassador to beef up security that were ignored.

Had the attack occurred swiftly and the compound overrun quickly and the 4 killed within minutes or even an hour or two, then yeah, no one would be howling quite as loud (although those requests for increased security would still be hanging over his head).

Instead, we have:

1. An attack that lasted between 6 and 7 hours.
2. It was being beamed back to the WH...live.
3. We have obama doing nothing about it.
4. We have obama going to bed, then getting up and flying off to Vegas the next morning.
5. We have rice, clinton and obama proclaiming it a spontaneous protest due to some video released 6 months prior...for a full 2 weeks after the attack.
6. We then have that video maker roused from his bed at 1:00AM by a SWAT team for "parole violations" (when is a SWAT team called out to round up someone for a "parole" violation??????) and thrown in jail, with no hearing or anything "at least until after the elections".

For crying out loud, the Air National Guard could have launched flights from the continental U.S. and almost been there before it was over....and yet not a finger was lifted to help, assist, or anything else with forces within minutes of the place.

Do you not see the issue here, at all? If not, then there is absolutely zero hope for your brainwashed mind.

Wow...just...wow.

 

So just so I have this all straight. American citizen in Yemen is killed by drone strike, to our knowledge never killed a single American, but foreign national responsible for deaths of four Americans is sought for arrest? This makes sense how?

 

It would certainly seem so though the public's memory is short when it wants to be. But anyone running against her would have an instant knockout punch just by bringing up the still unraveling Benghazi cover up.

The other shoe is big and bloody and has yet to fall. http://www.businessinsider.com/us-syria-heavy-weapons-jihadists-2012-10
Has Obama been sureptitiously supporting jihadists again? It sure seems that way and Hillary is all covered in that mud too.

 

And if that isn't enough, it just continues to get better...

EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say

Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. Consulate and subsequent attack several hours later was denied by officials in the CIA chain of command -- who also told the CIA operators twice to "stand down" rather than help the ambassador's team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.

Former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were part of a small team who were at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. Consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When they heard the shots fired, they radioed to inform their higher-ups to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange. An hour later, they called again to headquarters and were again told to "stand down."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-for-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources-say/


Really?????

What more do you obama kool-ade drinkers want? my God, this criminal could stand in front of live TV and flat out say he didn't give one iota of crap about those people in Benghazi and you liberal scum would still be clamoring over each other to vote for the turd.

 

It takes the likes of a hero to ignore an order from the Commander in Chief because they wanted to save Americans from being attacked. Still, Obama sits on Leno and jokes with Stewart as if nothing ever happened. The man has no conscious.

 

Quite simple ..... more lies, different lies but still more lies!

One common denominator .... have a guess!

Regards
Highlander

 

Woods was on the Beck show today and was 110% credible. One could not doubt his sincerity in any respect.

These bastards are lying to us. Fire all of them.

 

Self-love and power rules these worthless bastards' priorities.

 

You are right. They tried a cover-up and had a man dragged out of house as a scapegoat to calm down the "Arab Spring" rioters. Now, they are claiming all along that they knew it was a terror attack. So, why the arrest and the UN ambassador's repeated lies? At best, this was a cover-up much worse than Watergate. So, why the continued support for Obama from the Left and the media?

 

It was just a coincidence that the guy was hauled out of his house in the middle of the night.

 

They're committed to their bs. The Left are never wrong! They're legends in their own minds. One thing has been fairly consistent with this particular branch of the cult - no matter what official comments they trot out for the public munch, the opposite has an exceptional chance of ending up being the truth.

 

I swear,,I just can not think of anything more despicable,,,I use to like her. Is there any way she could have been fooled too? Naaa,,cant be.

 

Distinguishing between the riots and the Benghazi attack? Regardless, the people that performed the DEADLY (for Americans) attack chanted "take a picture Obama, we're all Osama" as they breached the embassy walls. Not much mention of a video with those particular killers. Oh - you mean it's generally agreed among Democrats that "the riots were caused by the video" [but, the attacks were caused by....???].

No video around to spur those attacks on Americans, either.

 

For sure,,only the lamest or Biased voter would not let this matter, she's cooked. Power does strange things to people, some even eat their own...

 

Isn't it Obama that insisted he mentioned terrorism in his Rose Garden speech? Now it's a video again? Whew boy,,they are all over the place.
The reason is simple, they know they have our press,,not much worry there.

 

BULL! {feel free to get Obama to say it too}

The riots were caused by those who do not respect Freedom of Speech.

1) "[9.32] They desire to put out the light of Allah with their mouths, and Allah will not consent save to perfect His light, though the unbelievers are averse."

2) "[8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is Hearing, Knowing." "AL-ANFAL (SPOILS OF WAR, BOOTY)"

Application of 1 + 2 = Al Quacka.

 

I would say you are mostly right. In Libya the riots and attacks were cause by a mixture of video, the American assassination of Bin Laden, the 9-11 anniversary, and the usual deep seated hatred that Islamic fundamentalists have for the West in general and America in particular - especially in that region of the nation. I disagree that the Benghazi attack was solely or even primarily due to the video. I think it was a combustible mixture of all of the above and more. Nevertheless, the CIA chain of command that deemed it advisable to deny the calls for help from the embassy and cost the lives of the ambassador and the two Navy SEALs should be held accountable for their deliberate neglect. The subsequent attempt to pin the attack solely on the video, for whatever underlying political reasons, was inaccurate and misleading at best

 

No problem.

Happens to me all the time, that is why I had to edit what I said; it was originally "The riots were caused by Freedom of Speech and those who do not respect it." I realized after a saw it on the big screen that it accused Freedom of Speech, which is innocent, and gave aid and comfort to the potential domestic enemy that is claimed to have been involved in a political arrest of the filmmaker for the video not the violation of parole.

Considering the history of Islam:

The riots were caused by the rioters in response to Freedom of Speech.

Bad:

"We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Obama) {that is why I blame it on his id}

Better:

"We understand why people take offense to this video because millions of our citizens are among them. I know there are some who ask why don't we just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws. Our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.

Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. As president of our country, and commander in chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day, and I will always defend their right to do so." (Obama, Address to the United Nations General Assembly, September 25, 2012) {that is presidential}

 

The very real problem begins with Obama refusing to add security for the Benghazi consulate, even though the Brits and Red Cross had to close up shop due to security concerns and warnings from the ambassador himself that security there was insufficient.

Then add in that once the fighting began the White House just sat back and watched. All and all, it's been absurdly comical that the administration is still stonewalling and spinning the clear facts.

For Hillary to tell Mr. Woods that they were going to "get" the chump that made a disrespectful You Tube video, as if that somehow covered the stench coming from Benghazi, is like blaiming the Watts riots on Stepin Fetchit movies.