I want to see these "racist" newsletters! Produce them or be silent!

So what? That isn't racist.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okwHmpMfhpw&feature=related"]White Americans will be a minority by 2042 - YouTube[/ame]

Fox News has had news segments on the same thing. Again, thank you for yet another failed and pathetic attempt to back up opinions you decided on a week ago.

 

Thank for showing exactly what is wrong with America.

You have demonstrated exactly why our country is going to fall to (*)(*)(*)(*).

 

they certainly are racist

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erUTemN7Mas"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erUTemN7Mas[/ame]

 

Now you're so desperate you're going to Al Sharpton to help make your case Ron Paul is racist? This is like swatting away flies.

 

no, i'm as cool as an ice cube, this is fun for me

 

Oh stop it. No one wants a (*)(*)(*)(*) isolationist, anarcho-capitalist in the White House except isolationist anarcho-capitalists!

That is what it amounts to. "Libertarianism" is just a cover word for Anarcho-Capitalism the same way "Progressivism" is just a cover word for "Socialist Democracy"

Most Americans do not want to abandon the role of world cop no matter how much you anarcho-capitalist lunatics hate that role. If we take some flak from the world for that role, well that just comes with the territory.

Most Americans do not want to abolish the Fed or institute script currencies that force workers into perpetual bondage to their employers.

Most Americans enjoy at least a moderate amount of Statism, and Statism is here to stay.

Most intelligent Americans know that economic protectionism is a dead end.

Virtually all Americans like the protections of the Civil Rights Act and the various civil rights amendments that prevent segregation.

Virtually all Americans think secession is treason.

Anarcho-capitalists may feel that Ron Paul is what Americans "need" but I can (*)(*)(*)(*) well be pretty sure that Ron Paul is not what Americans want.

A Ron Paul candidacy is a sure win for Obama.

 

Thanks for your useless input, Che Guevara.

 

Whatever, at least I don't follow a fossilized remnant of an ideology from a dead age.

 

And "Conservativsm" is just a cover word for "Christofascist Corporatism".

 

Your own opinion but, since I already understand your Philosophy you're a Authoritarian Imperialist who enjoys Socialistic Practices. I definitely understand why you would be opposed to Personal Freedom and Individual Responsibility.

It's just you and a few others who are either too ignorant as to why people hate us or they're profiteers from the Militarism.

So you're in favor of FIAT money that has Universally Failed every time and History... your own system forces workers to be in bondage with the Government to fork out Welfare because of the constant "Coin Clipping" similar to that of Rome.

Nope, just you and a few others still... there are still some of us who enjoy being rugged individualists and go mountain climbing in the winter rather than sit in a recliner advocating War as they sit comfortably thousands of miles away from the conflict.

Wasn't the point of the Civil Rights Act to create a Color Blind Society? It failed miserably considering now there are quotas and Government mandated requirements in working environments. Civil Rights Act didn't stop racism it simply made it a Friendly Government Brand ready to be served but, frankly it's soft racism to the core.

It wasn't at the time of the Civil War but, considering the Amendment changes I guess it is no longer viable. How is it relevant at all to Ron Paul?

It's what you want not for all of us out there... you want Rampant Militaristic Actions across the Globe in the name of "Security" and a Massive Nanny State program to keep you comfortable.

 

The words of a nutjob! The whole letter plays like a paranoid alarmist who desperately needs medication. His feelings on Jews and homosexuals are made clear and he warns about "the coming race war". I included a transcript link as well as a pdf photocopy link. The problem with the Branch Davidians is that they are bone headed and will shoot down any and all proof offered to them. Even if you presented a picture of Ron Paul in a KKK outfit, they'll demand to know who took the picture and what that person's agenda is. But here goes.

 

continued...

 

Sorry, I had to split it into two posts. The second post has Ron Paul's racist, anti-semitic, homophobic rants emboldened.

 

What rants?

Most neo-conservatives feel threatened by Dr. Paul.

 

Sounds to me the op is mad his loopy guy won't be invited to the New Year's party that counts.

 

it's the rednecks that should feel threatened, but i guess they're oblivious


Murray Rothbard and Lew Rockwell, Paul's friends and allies in his 1988 takeover of the Libertarian Party, came to believe that the sort of people who joke about blacks and welfare checks should be Hayekians.

Rockwell explained the thrust of the idea in a 1990 Liberty essay entitled "The Case for Paleo-Libertarianism." To Rockwell, the LP was a "party of the stoned," a halfway house for libertines that had to be "de-loused." To grow, the movement had to embrace older conservative values. "State-enforced segregation," Rockwell wrote, "was wrong, but so is State-enforced integration. State-enforced segregation was not wrong because separateness is wrong, however. Wishing to associate with members of one's own race, nationality, religion, class, sex, or even political party is a natural and normal human impulse."

The most detailed description of the strategy came in an essay Rothbard wrote for the January 1992Rothbard-Rockwell Report, titled "Right-Wing Populism: A Strategy for the Paleo Movement." Lamenting that mainstream intellectuals and opinion leaders were too invested in the status quo to be brought around to a libertarian view, Rothbard pointed to David Duke and Joseph McCarthy as models for an "Outreach to the Rednecks," which would fashion a broad libertarian/paleoconservative coalition by targeting the disaffected working and middle classes. (Duke, a former Klansman, was discussed in strikingly similar terms in a 1990 Ron Paul Political Report.) These groups could be mobilized to oppose an expansive state, Rothbard posited, by exposing an "unholy alliance of 'corporate liberal' Big Business and media elites, who, through big government, have privileged and caused to rise up a parasitic Underclass, who, among them all, are looting and oppressing the bulk of the middle and working classes in America."

... The populist outreach program centered on tax reduction, abolition of welfare, elimination of "the entire 'civil rights' structure, which tramples on the property rights of every American," and a police crackdown on "street criminals." "Cops must be unleashed," Rothbard wrote, "and allowed to administer instant punishment, subject of course to liability when they are in error." While they're at it, they should "clear the streets of bums and vagrants. Where will they go? Who cares?" To seal the deal with social conservatives, Rothbard urged a federalist compromise in their direction on "pornography, prostitution, or abortion." And because grassroots organizing is "plodding and boring," this new paleo coalition would need to be kick-started by "high-level, preferably presidential, political campaigns."

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/12/20/the_secret_origin_of_ron_paul_s_newsletters.html

 

He does sound like a republican.

 

what do you mean?

 

The republicans. Not the libertarians, not the conservatives ... the republicans. He sounds like them. The posters, I mean. He sounds like a republican forum poster. Many of them, anyway.

 

ok, tell me what you think about ron paul's political views

 

So, now you accept that he is racist but try to excuse it by comparing it to other racist activities. It's a small start.
It's always good to see a right-winger learn something new.

 

He sounds mostly reasonable outside the context of American politics. I get why people dig his rhetoric. I don't think his plans would really work for the most part ... I don't actually think some of his plans are within the purview of the presidency. But he does sound like a well-meaning guy.

 

Not all of them. As an ultra-conservative such as myself I don't freel threatened by Dr. Paul. I think Paul will be great to fix a rather broken system of government, but he is not a strong candidate to run against Obama nor is he the type of President we need now when we have a reinsurgent Russia and instability across the world.

We need a hawkish leader not a pacifist. Not saying we need more wars, we just need to be vigilant in these turbulent times.

 

i first saw ron paul speak more than 30 years ago

with no doubt, i can tell you that he's a deceptive politician

his strategy is to pander to whatever populism dictates he should

 

That is just freaking DUMB!. You call it pandering when a man stands his ground in Congress and correctly predicts not only the housing bubble and ensuing economic crisis but also the expansion of the US's militarism and loss of personal liberty? And that's years ahead of it actually happening. Yeah, classic pandering.....

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48Gfzgxh3ZQ&feature=related"]The Amazingly Accurate Predictions of Ron Paul - YouTube[/ame]