If Trump burned everybody alive who didn't vote for him, would you then condemn him?

Q: If Trump burned everybody alive who didn't vote for him, would you then condemn him?

A: Population of the world: 7.5 billion. Trump voters: 63 million including Russians and Cybernetics. Not Trump voters: 99.16% of all mankind.

 

Cotton eye Joe? I fail to see the significance.

 

No. I’m saying it’s still there.

 

Didn't you say that all American's are "intellectual cowards" because of it?

 

Why is everyone in the USA an idiot?

 

That sounds like the set up to a joke. What's the butt?

 

No - in the moment I'm only frustrated about everything what has to do with the English speaking world. A world full of senseless absurdities in the moment for me.

 

I’m using FreedomSeekers own standards against him.

 

And the relevance of that video is?

 

no comment

 

Are you okay?

 

no comment

 

So then do you recommend that the same concept be applied (a new version that over-writes the old bad version) to the NT verse that says that women are inferior and should shut the hell up in church? I do, how about you?

 

What the hell does this have to do with statutes of limitations? Are you suggesting that if the statutes of limitations didn't exist, then he would've been taken to trail and found guilty by now? You called the man a pedophile and I'm curious how you know that he is. If someone accused you of being a pedophile, are you a pedophile too?[/QUOTE]

Okay, but you think Obama's deportation policy was too harsh?

You referred to Putin as a "foe", did you not? And when did Trump praise Kim Jong Un?

 

Right, so no significant market climb since 2009?

 

It seems that @Golem didn't have anything in response to that!

 

Right, so no significant market climb since 2009?

 

Yes

I believe it was 6 or 7 victims, and about 30 witnesses that came forward

Yes.

Already responded. There is a "Search" option at the top right hand side of the page. You can look for words and specific posters.

There is a nice little service known as "Google". If you write, let's say... Kim Jong Un Trump Praise... that might provide all the information you need.

 

I'd like to know how you can predict how the court would have ruled. Also, he wasn't actually accused of engaging in sexual intercourse was he? Just accused of making sexual advances, which as far as I know, is not illegal unless it is considered to be grooming. And whether he would've gone to jail, that's not guaranteed either You come across as a very intelligent person, so when you say such utter nonsense, it really is surprising.

So that's it then - he is guilty until proven innocent? Lets just throw the legal system which America is built on out the window?

Who should be deported then? I mean if you're not for 100% zero deportation as you've said.

Yes and if you use this search option yourself and have a look back at your posts, you would see that you did NOT already respond as to how Putin is a "foe."

You cannot seriously be referring to when Trump told him that he made a "wise decision" in not bombing Guam! You seriously can't see how that meant, "you made a wise decision because if you'd gone the other way, your miserable country would be heading towards total destruction?" Oh no, Trump must have been saying that Kim Jong Un is a GREAT DUDE! Seriously, is anyone else other than you actually criticising Trump for this? Once again, I really do expect more from a person of your intelligence - but I guess that's what Trump Derangement Syndrome does to people and its really quite sad.

 

Some call it "common sense", others "logical reasoning". Generally it's based on the fact that 6 accusers and over 30 witnesses usually end in a conviction "beyond a reasonable doubt". I'm not accounting for unreasonable doubts, though.

You would be wrong.

As I said, I can't account for unreasonable doubts....

Too absurd to deserve a response.

Violent criminals, for example.

How Putin is a foe? He interfered in our elections! Why do you keep asking obvious questions? Not to mention absurd ones. I shall refrain from responding to those.

See? You can use Google. So you found the "teleprompter version" (which includes the instances where an adult takes control of his tweeter account) Now.... keep going and you'll find more.

 

Actually, if witnesses alone, with zero physical evidence can send a man to jail, then you're telling me something that I didn't know.
Anyway, when Trump endorsed him, was there actually already 6 accusers and over 30 witnesses?

So what felony is someone committing by making sexual advances?

That's actually your line isn't it? Unless someone commits a crime, then they can enter the US illegally today and stay forever and ever. Right?

That's a credible intelligence assessment, but Russia is not currently a recognised enemy of the USA.

What do you mean the teleprompter version?