Is there any hope for reconciliation in America?

The question of states’ rights is again being brought up on this forum. How did that turn out for us last time?

The bloodiest war in American history tends to confirm founding father John Dickinson’s prophecy "Then join hand in hand, brave Americans all! By uniting we stand, by dividing we fall!" . . . . In order to make America GREAT again, we must make America WHOLE again.

The world watches with amusement as we recreate the Hatfield and McCoy conflict: backwoods hillbillies feuding over vague memories and ambiguous principles. Trivial arguments are introduced and magnified in order to sustain the hostilities. Why do we keep doing this???

The answer is “ORCHESTRATED DIVISION”. The corporate sector utilizes the media to circulate inflammatory information and hurtful rumors in order to incite hostility and create division. This is a “divide and conquer” technique designed to neutralize the authority of “WE, THE PEOPLE” and render democracy ineffective. Consequently, the corporate sector is left free to exploit workers and consumers and solicit favors from government.

Politics has ALWAYS been SOMEWHAT controversial, but evidence of the present aspect of actual hostility was never there until the nineties, when Rush Limbaugh began his forceful attacks against Bill Clinton and his followers. As the movement caught on and gained momentum, political rhetoric between opposition parties became increasingly more disrespectful and condescending, and the corrosive gap of division became substantially wider.

Yes, we will once again experience unity. . . . Not in a time of universal prosperity, but when the vast majority hit rock bottom. . . filled with hopelessness and despair. Then, hopefully we can start over and learn from our mistakes.

 

There is a strange willful ignorance no matter where one goes seeking reconciliation adequate to create a functional government, economic structure and nation.

The thread I posted here is ignored.

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=492791&p=1067026464#post1067026464

Despite the fact that the agreement sought is already unconsciously accepted.

The current common dysfunctional mental paradigm of society demands the right to be sheeplike, despite the fact that it leads to ruin of one kind or another.

The agreement is valid historically and functional legally, and no reason had ever been out forth by a sincere American for simply, justifiably making and accepting the definitions of prime constitutional intent found within the two inquiries.

To me, who has presented those inquiries extensively in every facet of American society I can reasonably reach, it has become abundantly clear that psychosocial performance which is unconscious is very much in control.

For the record, there are always a small number who quietly accept it immediately, but will not promote it. Then the ranks of those operating unconsciously encounter it and proceed to display that they cannot source any reason to reject it but do so. And that fact is skins time used as reason to reject it by the remainder.

This despite the fact that the governmental structures in place must be responsive to the peoples agreement if such is made upon the inquiries or declarations.

It is fairly clear that the dysfunction represents a collective unconscious event that is determined by each individual via feelings their limbic system creates because of response patterns shared regularly through perhaps dream states of telepathic potentials.

The 1962 book titled "The Hjndredth Monkey" authored by 23 Japanese biologists documenting dream state sharing by primates that was only published in 20k copies was disappeared then replaced with another book by the same name published by Ken Keyes in about 3,5 mil copies, heavily publicized, which marginalized the notion if dream state sharing by mammals.

 

It's the same issue of centralized vs decentralized power played out again and again. America has been divided since 1788, and that's not changing anytime soon.

 

The 20 minute time limit on editing is prohibitive of communicating complex concepts composed on a phone,

Therefore I repost.

There is a strange willful ignorance no matter where one goes seeking reconciliation adequate to create a functional government, economic structure and nation.

The comment I posted here in this thread is ignored, but it is the most comprehensive relating to reconciliation and unity in America.

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=492791&p=1067026464#post1067026464

This, despite the fact that the agreement sought is already unconsciously accepted!

The current, common dysfunctional, mental paradigm of society demands the right to be sheeplike, despite the fact that it leads to ruin of one kind or another.

The agreement is valid historically and functional legally, and no reason has ever been put forth by a sincere American for NOT simply, justifiably making and accepting the definitions of prime constitutional intent found within the two inquiries.

To myself, who has presented those inquiries extensively in every facet of American society I can reasonably reach, it has become abundantly clear that psychosocial performance which is unconscious is very much in control.

For the record, there are always a small number who quietly accept it immediately, but will not promote it. Then the ranks of those operating unconsciously encounter it and proceed to display that they cannot source any reason to reject it but do so anyway. And that fact is used as reason to reject it by the remainder.

This despite the fact that the governmental structures in place must be responsive to the peoples agreement if such is made upon the inquiries or declarations.

It is fairly clear that the dysfunction represents a collective unconscious event that is determined by each individual via feelings of their limbic system created because of response patterns shared regularly through perhaps dream states or telepathic potentials.

The 1962 book titled "The Hundredth Monkey" authored by 23 Japanese biologists documenting dream state sharing by primates, that was only published in 20k copies was disappeared, then replaced with another book by the same name published by Ken Keyes. That second book published in numbers of about 3,5 mil copies, in 1974, was publicized with negative, marginalizing rhetoric dismissing the notion of dream state sharing by mammals, replaced it Today, no one knows of the profound scientific observations that were originally made.

But here on this forum a question is asked and then answered well enough to make a significant difference to any who are serious enough to seek and act upon comprehensive factors, and this is done without consequence because of the phenomena occurring with no authoritative review or accountability of any aspect.

 

Yes, reconciliation is possible, but it will require democrats give up their racist ideology of hating people solely based on the color of their skin.

 

Hating people like Obama???? ????

 

Lol no, of course not.

Hating white people, in general, and white males in particular....

 

I am sure that your belief puts YOU in a minority. Most people identify the primary topic of contention as government regulation vs. free market.

. . . . And why were Hillary and Bernie the top 2 contenders for the Democratic nomination???

I think that the main barrier to reconciliation is the partisan propensity to put ALL of the blame on the other party.

 

Hillary was the nominee cause she was the best liar the democrats could find. Bernie was just a dancing clown to provide the appearence of democracy, to hillarys coronation.

 

. . . . And you consider Trump to be truthful and dignified???

 

Thank you.

So far, no one on the Left has attempted to refute it.