Is this the 1st administration in history to be OK with chants of "DEATH TO AMERICA"?

Take note folks at how their narrative has just fell apart in only 2 pages (ONLY 2) and so many more to go
They've already taken the bait of being exposed with FREE SPEECH FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE
I can't wait to see what other cats our blue buddies let out of the bag!

 

You ever hear of accessory after the fact?

 

It sounds like you are speaking in riddles. If you have something to say with some FACTS to back it up then I'm all ears
Ready..............GO!!!

 

I'm sorry that you think basic rationality is a "riddle." I will try to help where I can. The facts I'm discussing are the facts in your OP . . . which you are violently opposed to discussing. If you have something to say about your own OP, then I'm all ears. Ready . . . go!

 

Remember how a gold star father was arrested at the SOTU speech?

 

What specific law was broken by the one moron who yelled "death to America"?

 

Could these acts be the logical result of 20+ years of a US begun Global War Of Terror brought by the Israeli False Flag at WTC on 911?

I love my country's flag, but sadly today that flag is also the symbol of the US government, currently run by a traitor imposter, a government that since the time of MLK or before is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world.

Pro-Israel Recipients • OpenSecrets

 

We will keep asking. No one will ever answer. Even the author of the OP is completely uninterested in discussing the OP.

 

I don't know. I will be able to get further in figuring out this mystery if you can tell me what law is broken by saying "Protest peacefully and patriotically"
Ready.....................GO!!!!!

 

Wait...who was arrested and brought up on specific charges of saying "Protest peacefully and patriotically"?

So basically no law was broken when the idiot yelled "death to America". This is just another one of your manufactured outrage rants.

 

Exactly. Two pages in, and the author of the OP still refuses to discuss the OP. I don't foresee that changing any time soon.

 

I don't remember saying a LAW was broken. The OP implied that BIden should address the country. Chants of DEATH TO AMERICA, in AMERICA is not normal. Also, can you say BUSTED!!!!!
I never mentioned the word "law", not ONCE. I think since you didn't have a good rebuttal you had to manufacture words that were NEVER SAID in order to be able to try and prove something
That is an EPIC FAILURE. I know you can do better. 3.....2.......1......GO!

 

If you don't think a law was broken then why did you post this???

 

I don't see a memo that says "You can only post in this forum if it is about a broken law"
But if that text exists then 1) allow me to apologize if i broke the forum rules and 2) please tell me where I can find this information 3) thank you

 

You're funny! your tricks don't work on me. I never said "inciting violence is legal", again, here you go trying to twist and contort into something you CAN answer (why do you keep wasting time on tactics that don't work on me?)

The real question here is, do YOU think that "DEATH TO AMERICA" is NOT incitement of violence?

 

the difference is if you invite a crowd and then incite them and then they go to the place you said you were going with them and are violent on your behalf - but as we have seen with Trump, even that is hard to prove

 

How did the DEATH TO AMERICA protests happen? do you think there were no "invites"? You think all those jew-hating anti-american Americans showed up there magically at the same time with no invite process? This I'd love to hear! I find the supernatural things to be very exciting (way more than politics)

 

sure have, is Trump guilty?

 

do not know who invited them, wasn't the President.... and do not know if there was any violence that resulted from that invite, or if the one doing the inviting was the one chanting

personally I think death threats should be considered a crime, even if it's generic as in all Americans - I think way too many people are getting away with death threats these days, that is not free speech

 

Well, first of all, thank you for finally talking about your own topic, but . . . no. That isn't really, in any legal sense, an incitement of violence, unless there are details that you are leaving out.

 

Congrats! You figured out how to shut me up: LOGIC and COMMON SENSE (i don't think your blue buddies on here got the memo though, you might want to let them in on it)
Nicely done @FreshAir

 

I support it. And you should to. Know why I support it and you should to? Because if we crack down on this then what should we crack down on next? Who determines what gets cracked down on? Pretty sure you hooted and hollered about the Biden Administration collaborating with Twitter to censor conservative posts. This is no different.

That said, Biden COULD speak out against it. No other resources need be spent. Just a simple speech of his own. (well...written by his handlers at least with him stuttering through it)

 

agree, Biden should speak out against this

a speech like this one by Bush Jr

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/09/13/zelizer.bush.muslims/index.html

"Those who feel like they can intimidate our fellow citizens to take out their anger don't represent the best of America; they represent the worst of humankind, and they should be ashamed of that kind of behavior," Bush said.

 

I never said you did say “inciting violence is legal”. I simply asked you a question. I asked you if you think inciting violence isn’t against the law. Hence the question mark.

Clearly you don’t since you haven’t stated any laws were broken. Per the video in the OP it doesn’t appear any violence erupted as a result of the idiot saying “death to America”, therefore no law seems to have been broken.

 

As long as the protest was peaceful, the protesters can spout anything thing they want. It’s called the first amendment. Now setting the flag on fire, that may depend on whether there’s a fire ordinance or not. Then again, even if there was, I doubt there would be prosecutions. Setting the flag on fire is protected speech these days.


There were more protests and at times violent protests during the Vietnam War. These protest like this aren’t going to win the protesters any friends. It probably will do just the opposite hurting their cause. That remains to be seen.