Islamic Terrorist Attack In Beijing - Strange!

See, I thought we were all part of the same species until Ivan-88 informed us that the Japanese and the Chinese were different species. I was thinking maybe he could also identify those Talmudo-Muslim Wahhabi Allah Ahkbar US Israelis he's always talking about as another species. So yeah, I want to hear more about Ivan-88's race theories. Although mostly I'm laughing at him.

And for the record, everyone thinks of Canadians as members of the human species, or at least they did until Justin Beiber came along.

 

1. Yes, you have many “Bin Laden sympathizers” on your hands including Amnesty International and the following three renowned personalities.

(a) Gert-Jan Knoops, a Dutch-based international law specialist
(b) London-based distinguished human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson
(c) Brad Adams, Human Rights Watch Asia director
(d) Amnesty International

You are using a common propaganda technique of totalitarian regimes which have little compunction about resorting to denigrating their opponents with all sorts of labels once their arguments are on the verge of bankruptcy.

2. Following are excerpts from the article headlined “Is Osama bin Laden killing legal? International Law experts divided” at http://www.ibtimes.com/osama-bin-laden-killing-legal-international-law-experts-divided-282739

(Begin excerpts)
....many people feel the U.S. government has gone too far in playing the role of judge, jury and executioner and rather should have captured bin Laden and put him on trial, irrespective of the fact that he was an evil terrorist with the blood of thousands on his hands.

According to Gert-Jan Knoops, a Dutch-based international law specialist, bin Laden should have been arrested and extradited to the United States and then put on trial. Knoops drew parallels with the arrest of former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic, who was put on trial at the war crimes tribunal in The Hague after his arrest in 2001. The Americans say they are at war with terrorism and can take out their opponents on the battlefield, Knoops said. But in a strictly formal sense, this argument does not stand up.

London-based distinguished human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson has also described the killing of the al-Qaeda leader as a perversion of justice that would rebound on the US.

The Australian-born Queen's Counsel has sat as an appeal judge on a UN war crime court and is one of three jurist members on the international organization's Internal Justice Council.

It's a perversion of the term. Justice means taking someone to court, finding them guilty upon evidence and sentencing them. This man has been subject to summary execution, and what is now appearing after a good deal of disinformation from the White House is it may well have been a cold-blooded assassination, Robertson told ABC TV.

Brad Adams, Human Rights Watch Asia director also feels that Obama was wrong in saying Justice has been done.

If he wasn't shooting at the soldiers, the killing should be investigated, Adams said. People are saying that justice has been done, but justice has not been done. Justice is when you arrest someone and put them on trial...... (End excerpts)

3. Following are excerpts from the article headlined “Amnesty criticises US for ‘unlawful’ Bin Laden raid” at http://tribune.com.pk/story/383655/amnesty-criticises-us-for-unlawful-bin-laden-raid/

(Begin excerpts)
WASHINGTON: Amnesty International criticised the United States on Wednesday for its use of lethal force, particularly for the “unlawful” killing of Osama bin Laden in a clandestine US commando raid in Pakistan last May.

“The US administration made clear that the operation had been conducted under the USA’s theory of a global armed conflict between the USA and al Qaeda in which the USA does not recognise the applicability of international human rights law,” it said in its annual report.

“In the absence of further clarification from the US authorities, the killing of Osama bin Laden would appear to have been unlawful,” it said..... (End excerpts)

4. "Legal and ethical aspects of the killing, such as his not being taken alive despite being unarmed, were questioned by others, including Amnesty International.”

Death of Osama bin Laden
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden

 

China has been fighting al Qaeda for years. This is a world war. Catch up.

 

He was wanted for the Embassy Bombings and resisted arrest as he had ample opportunity to turn himself in over the years and, as his actions of escape and evasion were not in agreement with a person who is going to turn himself in and his company fired upon those who under UN Article 51 came to arrest him with illegal weapons it was quite legal.

Now please make your case where Osama is the poor innocent dude who was gulaged by his own family for being a terrorist and was the most wanted man in America for his terrorist actions over the years.

 

The problem debated by Evan88 and other netizens had nothing to do with any two species but with a Japanese ultra-nationalist. He behaved as though he had crawled out of the war-linked Yasukuni "Symbolic Registry of Souls", just like the ghost of Sadako crawling out of the well and out of a TV set in a 1998 Japanese horror mystery film "Ring" (aka "Ringu") by director Hideo Nakata.

He kept bragging about his self-proclaimed "perfect, superior pure blood" species and did not hide his contempt for other races. The links below show some examples of his racist posts.

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=328267&page=27

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=328267&page=31

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=328267&page=32

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=328267&page=33

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=328267&page=34

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=328267&page=37

Ring (film)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_(film)

Ringu's final Sadako scene
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbj-Ihy3ncQ

P.S. I hope Evan88 can give a satisfactory response to your question.