'Israeli' blood thist.

I never said that individuals cannot act or be influenced but their actions are still theirs. Only theirs.

 

Wow!....Well I never.... Lol.

 

Oh little Liebe, sweet little Liebe, shall I sing this to you in a love song.

It is oft not what one does say that is revealing, but that which one does not say.

TMR, just the other day, gave you a fine chance to show moral sincerity.

And you failed, Liebe, you could not bring yourself to do it.

It is true that you are more tempered that some, and I guess some of the most thick must make you cringe, right, like those that profane all the time, or speak about Musrats, or Palestinian children being parasites, or those that habitually call, on this very forum (as per those other comments), for the continuation of the humiliation, the theft, and the degradation of around 1million THINKING HUMAN BEINGS, but for all of that, you NEVER pick up those, and ONLY pick up anyone that is critical of Jews and Israel esp.

 

It does if someone lays claim to that ethnicity entitling them to something, at the cost to another.

 

You will have to prove where I have done what you do all day and that is condemn a specific group of people. Until you do so, there is nothing much to discuss.

I have always made my moderate position clear. It reflects the EU position too. Nothing unusual or radical to it.

 

This is becoming a riddle.

Unless I kill, I am not a killer, even if all other Germans/whites/women are killers.

End.

 

Well she has already got one thead totally mixed up, claming it has her thread, sort of a microcosm, when you think about it, in terms of politics.

Then there is her new position of there being no real truth and reality, which, if applied, would mean that as long as one believes something to to be true, and can ideally get the bulk to believe it, then it is true, or not, in reverse.

All depends on perception, apparently.

This man agrees.

He too think that something can be false AND true, in his alternate reality.

[video=youtube;9SQWB36uKkw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SQWB36uKkw[/video]

 

So those following orders are worse than those executing the orders, and those that wrote the doctrine in the first place, are the least to blame?

 

Oh Liebe, come on, you never jump on a racist Jew or Israeli.

Ever.

 

A person's perception does not require persuading anyone else. Our brain perceives as it receives sensory information without requiring anyone else to expereince it, Hence witnesses give very different statements of the same event.

Try not to twist my words Jack for your own purposes.

A thread is a thread. It is insignificant.

 

Well the only jews I know here are Gilos and Uri. Not at all racist. I like them.

 

It depends if you are talking about wartime or peace time. German law says that whoever is involved in planning or conspiring to kill are guilty. But not just because they share a religion with the planner or executor. Ha ha ha

 

Would that be Gilos who wanted ground troops to attack a civiian population, 50% of whom are children, just a few days ago?

 

LOl you always jump on the jew.......in every thread.

 

I am asking you.

Who is more culpable.

An author who writes a given doctrine, that may involve dehumanisation of another.

Those that order it.

Those that carry it out.

 

And you call me a 'Nazi' for it.

But that does not address what you never do.

Which is....you never jump on a racist Jew or Israeli.

 

I jump on no nationality. Try to get that because I am getting tired.

And while you are at it, why dont you jump on the "muslim"? See you have a HUGE blind spot.

 

Liebe, read what I wrote, not what pops into your brain.


you never jump on a racist Jew or Israeli.

 

No they were not.

 

Yup, the so called Diaspora are another fable, or fable with a sand grain of truth.

 

And I told you the only ones I know, Uri and Free Man and Gilos and I like them. So what are you on about?

 

Then you must be screen blind, if you do not see the routine, habitual, and digusting anti Muslim rhetoric, on here, which you never rebuke.

Only if it is against Israel or Jews, do you race to anyone's defence.

It's fine.

Everyone knows it, and everyone can see you are a fan of Israel.

No need to be coy.

 

I am not coy. I beleive in Israel's right to exist, aswell as Palestines, with land swaps and peace for all.

This is also your countries position so it is not radical.

You said I should condemn the jew or Israeli and when i tell you that I like them, you say I should condemn something else.

You never condemn anyone but jews; at least I condemn no one, so morally you are not the one to throw stones, old friend.

Everyone can see who you are a fan of *wink*

this exchange is a wonderful example of how truths are subjective.

 

Ha.................................

according to their history books they were, on both accounts, why you state otherwise plz? Im perplexed.

 

Well, there is one problem right there - maybe, just maybe, things NEED to be 'radical', rather than plod along, doing more of the same paper shuffling.

Maybe things are not 'radical' nearly enough, after all, I bet to you, the word itself is a negative, yes?

For another thing, you put imo, way too much faith in what a Gov's position may be, or what the EU may think.

If you want to trust such people, and believe they act in all of our interests, let alone anyone else, then you cling to the party line.

But my Gov does not speak for the people, any benefit we get due to their presence is incidental.