'Israeli' blood thist.

Hamas is radical. Netanyahu is radical. Ever heard of radicals getting along?
The world is not negative. It is both negative and positive.
Sorry but your government speaks for the majority of your people as it was so voted in.

 

Right, but people take it to mean mostly negative, imo.

When in fact, something dynamic is better than shuffling papers, and droning on about road maps to peace..

You can say that my Gov speaks for the people that voted them in,that is fine.

That was not the majority.

 

Right, but people take it to mean mostly negative, imo.

When in fact, something dynamic is better than shuffling papers, and droning on about road maps to peace..

You can say that my Gov speaks for the people that voted them in,that is fine.

That was not the majority.

 

Being as we are a "democracy" you would think so, right? But as our first past the post system is far from democratic in terms of outcome, it doesn't necessarily follow that its does speak for the majority. A flawed electoral system that results in politicians being elected every 5 years is not an accurate measure of public opinion. Anyway, on what issues do they supposedly speak for the majority? Since there are a variety of issues its an impossibility to arrive at a consensus. Moreover, your premise is basd on the assumption that those who are voted into power actually follow through on their pre-election promises. Here in the UK, that is known as a manifesto but is as worthless as any non-binding contract. Needless to say, once in power the politicians rarely follow through on what are invariably contentious issues, many of which have the potential to bring power to account. So your given that the "government speaks for the majority" amounts to a red-herring. Extrapolated to the intra-national level, then you can see that the decisions of the EU are also, by definiton, not necessarily democratic either. Western liberal forms of democracy, that you place so much importance on, is deeply flawed.

 

I should think that is exactly the type you like the most given your post history. Congrats on 20,000 posts btw.

 

When allowed to participate, Jews have made many scientific and cultural contributions to civilization. Contrast them to the unproductive, disorganized, and mindlessly violent way the Arab rabble live and you will realize whose side advanced races should be on. You should want the Jews on our side; the Arabs are a useless throwaway race that can only drag us further down in our unnatural race to the bottom. By the natural law of intellectual property rights, they shouldn't even be allowed to own their oil. Just like the American heirheads who have poisoned us with their decadence, the bloated sheiks did nothing to earn their wealth. It is the sign of a lack of intelligence to reward people just for being lucky when it was the technology of superior races that totally created the value of what lies under their desert.

Besides, these genetically criminal tribes are an echo of a pre-historic horror. Long ago they were driven into the desert as fugitives from justice. If we find oil on prison grounds, do we let the convicts get wealthy off it?

 

The Israelis are doing the same thing the American pioneers did, so proud patriots should align with it. Nature is not a real estate agent; use it or lose it is the natural law of property. Just like our American ancestors rightfully claimed the land occupied by backward savages who never would have made any contributions to the rest of the world, the Jews decalared their right of possession, as justified in the phrase "making the desert bloom." You really should read Leon Uris's The Haj. Then, if you are a real American and not ashamed of our past, you will realize which side you should identify with.

 

Forgive me Jack for intervening on this one. Rumsfeld famously said, "why did God put OUR oil in other people's countries?" as the US justification for invading natural resource-rich countries. Such arrogance is premised on the notion that the US has a natural God-given right to the ownership of the world's resources. The point is, the oil found on prison grounds is no more an acquistional right of the person who has no juristiction over the said grounds than that of the convicts. All things being equal, if the oil can be regarded as 'belonging' to anyone, then it belongs collectively to the people occupying the land underneath which the said natural resource is located. There is nothing objectively "natural" about intellectual property claims to natural resources, and frankly, your generalized disparaging remarks towards Arabs, stinks of racism.

 

You can't blame the Israelis
View attachment 16451 as long as the USA protects them, lies for them, kills for them, finances them and does even worse things in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Syria, Vietnam, Germany, Philppines, Japan, Korea, Panama, etc. etc.

 

We do not have to accept the accidents of history. Rewarding those rare people who invent the technology to create value from previously worthless land will give them the incentive to create more. The whole world will benefit from such a policy. Likewise, rewarding backward tribal nomads who did nothing to create the wealth glorifies luck and demoralizes the people who are of the most value to the world.

Handing over the fruits of our intellectual resources to unproductive parasites was the original sin against homo sapiens. The unfit races of the homo erectus Neanderthal type should have been extinct by now. The survival of the fittest doesn't operate if the fittest are full of self-hatred and become decadent pushovers. Loaded terms such as "racism," which is merely a proper judgment based on behavior, are symptoms of a suicidal attitude towards our natural enemies.

Arising from this original sin of insulting the productive races came price-gouging from an illegal cartel. Terrorism inevitably followed the weak reaction to that probe of our willingness to defend ourselves.

This whole doomsday scenario was initiated by traitors. The American oil companies, who themselves steal the wealth (through corporate patents) that was created by a few intelligent employees, established OPEC so they could piggyback on price-gouging. The real shame and humiliation is that we have not sought "ownership of the world's resources"; the "sin" charged against us by the self-righteous multiculturalist appeasers is as invalid as their malignant tumor of degenerate attitudes is on the national debate. You are completely brainwashed if you don't come to the logical conclusion that our wars over there were to protect OPEC's price-gouging against the national interest of all except a greedy few. If America actually retaliated against jihadist economic attacks on our national wealth, our government's seizing the oil as reparations would force the drillers to lower the price to $5 a barrel, which is all they could get away with if they were selling us our own oil. The historical refusal of the American people to let our own companies gouge us on oil obtained from our national territory is what led the oil companies to make us dependent on high-profit OPEC oil. This is the obvious conclusion that history will make, once the present mind control of the collaborators with Arab terrorism is exposed. Only then can Americans think freely again and have logical opinions on this topic.

 

What do you mean ......... those living like parasite on the backs of the American tax payers? Those been given 3 billion yearly by the senators who have them elected regardless which party they stand, Judas behavior if ever there was and traitors to there own nation!

AS for those unproductive "Arabs", would they be unproductive if they could farm there own lands, free from the genocide perpetrated on them by your Nazi Zionists?

Aye, your hypocrisy knows no bounds, Nazi Talmud degenerates one and all!

Highlander

 

Then by your reasoning a criminal, lying, stealing cheat would be the ultimate 'patriot'.

 

The Israelis "stole" it from the British, who "stole" it from the Turks, who "stole" it from the Arabs 700 years ago. All those centuries, the self-proclaimed indigenous Palestinians have been renting land owned by other nations. And millenia before that, if you include all the ancient empires and caliphates. Time marches on and unfit ethnicities get stomped on to clear the road for more productive groups.

 

700yrs, eh?

How far back do you wish to go?

I know - let's kick the primates out of the trees, and we can go live in them again.

 

700yrs, eh?

How far back do you wish to go?

I know - let's kick the primates out of the trees, and we can go live in them again.

 

Indeed. International law is a major inconvenience for social Darwinists.

 

The Arabs are primates, leftover homo erectus, related to the Neanderthals. If you want to follow politically correct anthropology, you're ignoring a clear and present danger, an echo of a pre-historic horror. The evolved human species originally kicked them into the desert as fugitives from justice. This is obvious, because no wandering tribe or species would have chosen the desert as a place to settle down in. Unlike the multiculturalists, who start out their debate with a pre-conceived conclusion about equality, I use logic and the known behavior of this unfit and malignant species to come to a conclusion. Survival of the fittest won't happen if the fittest lose their pride and courage.

 

Either ignore the multiculties' laws or become a colony of the UN. Simmer in simian sameness.

 

Homo sapien are primates.

As to your assertion, that would mean 'Arabs'(??) were most common in what is now the North of Europe.

 

It's about time that this forum embraced satire and enjoyed a bit of comedy. Great post

 

Lol - From what is known about Nea though, there was interaction with homo sapien.

I watched a test, some time ago, about all of this. The scientists established that Nea were v short, and broad across the shoulders, compared to homo sapien. To demonstrate why, they took two men, one with a tall and athletic frame, and the other with a short and squat frame, and submerged them in sub zero water, to see who could tolerate the cold best. The frame of the Nea type was visibly better at retaining heat, therefore, able to endure much colder environs.

Science was not able to find a full skeleton, however, they did manage to piece a full one together, from different parts that were found.

Their impression is in my first pic.

Piltdown man is also interesting, as my second pic shows..

 

Jews and arabs are human beings. Worthy end to a famebait thread joo blood thist (sic).

 

Baiting the famous (or otherwise) who dare to criticise Zionism with the demeaning epithet 'Jooo' or similar, is the specialism of Zionists and their apologists...Sorry, couldn't resist.

 

Do what you usually do then.

We are 222 posts in. Everyone else has been fine with the thread. Why not just go away if YOU do not like it?

 

LOL...it is becoming sooo obvious now.

More so than ever.

Anyway, before the person manages to pin the 'flamebait thread' on this, 200+ posts in, and click her fingers, let us return to what is a salient point...the perpetual desire in Israel to agitate, kill, fight with their neighbours, then always make out like they do no wrong ever.

Do you think it is their racist education system that has made them that way?

Do you think it is because they have somehow been able to ride rougshod over law so long, it has fed the arrogance?

Do you think it is because they must have perpetual conflict, in order to almost demonstrate their own worth?

Thoughts on that, TMR?