Here's a post I just made on another thread that's relevant to this discussion. http://www.politicalforum.com/histo...851-hitlers-second-book-3.html#post1062987239
Quote: Funny how so many antisemitic losers use Yiddish while calling Jews who invented the language stupid. End of Quote Yiddish is essentially German with some Russian words interposed. It sounds like a German Pomeranian accent. Germans have no problem understanding Yiddish. I think your statement above is wrong therefore (alternatively Jews invented the German language which is rather unlikely). To keep on the topic: I do not think there is a conspiracy but a typical pattern of behavior which can look like "conspiracy" but which is not less reason to be concerned. I give you an example: The German constitutional monarchy founded in 1871 had the most liberal legislation towards all kind of religious beliefs, including Jews. The legislation said that "religious beliefs neither will improve nor encumber the pursuit of blessedness of the German citizen". In the following the percentage of the Jewish ppulation in academic professions and higher administration as well as banking and ownership of press grew disproportionally to their percentage in the general German population. That was during a time when the rest of the world including the USA had so called Jewish Quota limiting the percentage of Jews participating in those professions to their percentage in the population. That is not to criticize the disproportional distribution. It is the right of everyone in a free society to achieve what he can achieve. This is to say that the second German Reich was not as anti semitic as it is described today by so called academic historians. After WWI broke out the Germans desperately but unsuccessfully tried to avoid two front war. When this however happened, 50% of the German troops in the West reached a stalemate and the other 50% won the war in the East. Nevertheless being able to deploy those troops into the West the German Reich offered "neutral" peace to the Entente, a peace without winners and losers. Facing a defeat, British and German Zionists then offered to the British War cabinet to win the war by using their connections to draw the USA into the war. As reward the Zionists demanded Palestine as homeland for Jewish settlements. Because the Lusitania incident in 1915 was not suitable to act as trigger the German Zionist and Foreign Office Secretary Arthur Zimmermann sent a bogus telegram, the so called "Zimmermann Telegram", to the German Embassy in Washington D.C. based on which President Wilson declared war against the German Reich. The allegedly decrypted telegram was handed to Wilson by Lord Balfour. The reward for the Zionists was expressed in the British Balfour Declaration of 1917. Authors of the Balfour Declaration: Chaim Weizmann, Lord Balfour, Woodrow Wilson. The Germans then signed an armistice based on the expectation of a peace agreement based on Wilson's famous 14 points. What followed was the most shameful peace of paper ever produced in the history of mankind: the Versailles Treaty. Vice chief of the British Versailles Treaty comission: Lord Balfour. The Balfour Declaration was integrated into the British Mandate over Palestine by the "League of Nations", the British Empire had founded the day before. Chief of the "League of Nation Reparation Commisison" which in 1921 fixed German "reparations" to 16 Trillion US $ (value 2013): Lord Balfour. The Germans having been economically wrecked, disarmed and held as hostage for the enormous payments had the right to feel betrayed by Zionists, mainly represented by their own Zionist foreign secretary Arthur Zimmermann. Hitler exploited that anti Zionism aka anti semitism. He was however pragmatical enough to sign an agreement with the Zioniosts, the "Haavara Agreement". Under the Haavara agreement Jewish settlers to Palestine were allowed to take with them all of their assets. Immobile values were purchased by the German Reich, the amount tranferred to the Haavara Bank in Tel Aviv (Haavara: "Transfer" in Hebrew). The Germans set up 100 training camps for Jewish settlers and 40 similar camps in Austria (responsible in Austria: Adolf Eichmann). Zionists in Nazi Germany were the only ones allowed to wear own uniforms. Their daily newspaper "Jüdische Rundschau" was the only paper in Nazi Germany not under any censorship and consecutively its printed output increased 10-fold. When Jews were prohobited to raise the Nazi flag it was explicitely permitted to them under state protection to raise the Zionist flag, today's flag of Israel. Quote: The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage emigration of Germany’s Jews to Palestine. This would require increased Jewish self-awareness. Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish cultural organizations — in short, everything that would encourage this new consciousness and self-awareness – should be promoted, the paper recommended. SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein and Zionist Federation official Kurt Tuchler toured Palestine together for six months to assess Zionist development there. Based on his firsthand observations, von Mildenstein wrote a series of twelve illustrated articles for the important Berlin daily Der Angriff that appeared in late 1934 under the heading “A Nazi Travels to Palestine.” The series expressed great admiration for the pioneering spirit and achievements of the Jewish settlers. Zionist self-development, von Mildenstein wrote, had produced a new kind of Jew. He praised Zionism as a great benefit for both the Jewish people and the entire world. A Jewish homeland in Palestine, he wrote in his concluding article, “pointed the way to curing a centuries-long wound on the body of the world: the Jewish question.” Der Angriff issued a special medal, with a Swastika on one side and a Star of David on the other, to commemorate the joint SS-Zionist visit. A few months after the articles appeared, von Mildenstein was promoted to head the Jewish affairs department of the SS security service in order to support Zionist migration and development more effectively. The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, proclaimed its support for Zionism in a May 1935 front-page editorial: “The time may not be too far off when Palestine will again be able to receive its sons who have been lost to it for more than a thousand years. Our good wishes, together with official goodwill, go with them In 1945 the Jewish dominated Nuremberg Court declared the SS a criminal organization. Mainly in Czechoslovakia SS and Waffen SS soldiers were hanged by their feet on lamp posts and ignited by gasoline. Rewritten history ignores, quote: The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation between Hitler’s Germany and international Zionism. Through this pact, Hitler’s Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930s to support Jewish development in Palestine.. Instead we are drowned in Holocaust memorials and commemoration. The Haavara agreement is the source of the Arab legend that Hitler was the true founder of Israel. Today it looks like that is more than an urban legend. Quote: Former officials of the Ha’avara company in Palestine confirmed this view in a detailed study of the Transfer Agreement published in 1972: “The economic activity made possible by the influx German capital and the Haavara transfers to the private and public sectors were of greatest importance for the country’s development. Many new industries and commercial enterprises were established in Jewish Palestine, and numerous companies that are enormously important even today in the economy of the State of Israel owe their existence to the Haavara.” My conclusion: The similarity is that Zionists at least two times in history betrayed those who in the first place were friendly and in the second place were hostile but tried to organize a working solution for them, the Second and the Third German Reich. What looks like a Jewish conspiracy is Zionists or Jews cooperating with those whose intentions benefit to their own goals, in the end showing some lack of loyalty which is truely concerning. Today the United States of America are the mighty partner of the Zionists. How might that cooperation come out in the end? (Those concerns must be taken serious and not swept under the table by declaring them to be "anti semitism" and to wave the "Holocaust bat".) http://www.effedieffe.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9185&Itemid=152 http://www.bearcanada.com/fae/israel/benjaminfreedmanspeech.html
I don't think there will ever be a New World Order with the Jews in charge. They seem perfectly happy being in charge of the U.S. and Great Britain.
Didn't say he was Jewish but he would have felt that the Jews were in charge. He succumbed to their every mandate.
We live in a world where Sunni Muslims blow up Shi'ite Muslims, and it is still blamed on Jews and Israel.
Rothschild empire controls the debt producing central banks of every country that has a central banking system..as a senior member of the clan said "give me control of a nation's money supply and I care not who makes the laws"...that is how they control nations, particularily their policeman the USA...notice countries that do not have central banks are villified and actually invaded....Syria, Iran, North Korea, Cuba..prior to that Libya, Iraq were added to the list....that is how the zionists control the world...
A zionist is a person who believes in the development and protection of the state of Israel. That is their agenda. What you object to is the "protection" part. What would you suggest?
There are crazies all over the place, some Jewish and many others who aren't Jewish. And guess what? They all say stupid things. So get with the program, since it isn't about Jews or Zionists. It is about extremists.
False Jews=Khazarian Jews, the Ashkenazi ruling class of Israel....the Palestinians has more Jewish blood than these do.
Oh please, that was just a sarcastic post to your comment. In case you didn't get it, I was comparing your post to Farrakhan's message. In a negative sort of way.
And in case you didn't get it, I merely placed your Farrakhan video in the proper discussion after you placed it in the wrong discussion