hey, i warned you where this junk about legal discrimination could go. that is why i disagree with the ruling.
Not the blm or gay rights group. Discrimination would simply be presumed to be based upon sexual orientation and race.
Well, at least now we know what you mean by Tyrannical dictator. Someone who fires anyone in his staff.
OK sure. Right after they're put out of business. A bakery simply didn't want to make a cake for a gay affair and look at what the MSM did to them. They sold goods to gay people all the time. But because of one cake...business destroyed. Care to try again. If any bar daed kicking Obama supporters out they would be shut down for racism and bigotry. YOU know it, but are to partisan to admit it. =)
I agree, and this will end up backfiring on liberals. There simply is no other way for this to be seen. Anyone can now discriminate customers according to their stated political beliefs, the only question now is how liberal judges will twist those beliefs into something that only liberals will be protected...
You can't prove you are or aren't gay without action that might get you arrested in a public place. There will be no protection for gays according to this judge's ruling...