Judge calls Trump impeachment probe legal, says House must get Mueller grand jury information

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by The Mello Guy, Oct 25, 2019.

  1. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,010
    Likes Received:
    9,401
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As bright as I seem, I haven't memorized the entire 448 pages. It takes time to find things.

    If you "know all the details", why do you get it wrong all the time?
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2019
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    directly refuted by the judiciary.

    Magic invisible words don’t change reality. Nowhere in any house rule or citation you’ve provided is a vote required to have an inquiry. That is reality.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2019
  3. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have gotten nothing wrong. Mueller and his team found no conspiracy with Russia, in Vol 1, and in Vol 2 didn't conclude a crime took place. This is why Shifty and company have moved on from Mueller and are trying to say that Trump somehow abused his power by asking the President of a nation we been aiding since Obama's "more flexible" policy, to continue to fight corruption
     
  4. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nowhere is any vote required for an inquiry, as numerous people here and the judiciary have shown you.
     
  5. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,010
    Likes Received:
    9,401
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You've gotten virtually everything about the Mueller Report wrong.

    Very badly wrong.
     
  6. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Magic invisible words don’t change reality. Nowhere in any house rule or citation you’ve provided is a vote required to have an inquiry. That is reality.[/QUOTE]
    Not sure what you mean, the Judiciray won't make a ruling on House rules.

    Again, I am curious how you think the House passes bills and resolutions?
     
  7. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you've been given the ruling lol

    Neither are relevant to the fact an impeachment inquiry is currently ongoing, and that there is no vote required in order to do so. That is reality.
     
  8. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Like what?
     
  9. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Huh?

    The impeachment inquiry won't start til after Thursday....granted it's still not in the right Committee according to the resolution, but it's a step in the right direction.

    Then why is Nancy voting on the resolution?
     
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Repeatedly refuted this. Sorry.
     
  11. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    White flag noted....Nancy actually waved it for you as well...
     
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Uh, why do you always seem so confused? Directly refuting your nonsense isn’t a white flag, lol.
     
  13. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am not confused....Nancy waved the flag...the vote will be tomorrow. Keep up.
     
  14. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’m way ahead of you. I refuted your claim of a vote being needed the first time you made it. Then a judge did as well, lol.
     
  15. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No a Judge didn't...a Judge didn't look at the House Rules.

    the House Rules require it, as you are aware, and Nancy waved the flag and did it
     
  16. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Refuted this already.
     
  17. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    hahahh White Flag noted....even if you won't admit it, Nancy did for you
     
  18. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You again show your confusion. Directly refuting your nonsense is not a white flag, lol.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2019
  19. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nancy P waved it, and directly refuted you. Move a long, your Dear Speaker has spoken.
     
  20. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why in the world would any seeker of truth in this matter have any objection to the grand jury testimony or any other previously redacted materials being turned over to Congressional investigators? It seems to me that anyone trying to conceal this information is attempting to obstruct justice. See what I mean?
     
  21. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No matter how many times you repeat it, you will remain incorrect. Nowhere is it required for the house to have a vote in order to have an impeachment inquiry. That is reality.
     
  22. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not according to the rules and of course Nancy P
     
  23. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No rule exists requiring a vote to have an inquiry. That is reality. Nancy knows that as well as you do.
     

Share This Page