Not really...just "reflecting" the poster's behavior form the past. See the 911 forum for further examples. I don't take the poster seriously because, in my opinion, he has his own agenda and isn't.....well..you figure it out. He'll have me banned if I take his bait.
they do seem to be relishing what happened that night, don't they ? it's their small little victory against the forces that have changed the America they grew up in - be it minorities, women, gays, etc .....
To put it simply, the OJ jury of 8 blacks acquitted the black OJ. A jury consisting of 5 blacks might have found the white Zimmerman guilty, thus favoring the black victim. I'm not suggesting this did or would happen, I'm only answering your question.
The verdict must be accepted. I have no problem with that, but laws like "stand your ground" are legitimizing vigilantes and enabling those who see themselves as 'law enforcers.' The case was decided properly, but these laws need to be revisited.
Thanks. I agree that it is a possibility, but the poster I was asking said it was only about the money, not about the race ... Then hypocritcally reversed himself. - - - Updated - - - Per usual.
That is a pretty rare occurrence. It is many times more likely to happen the other way around. As far as the Zimmerman case goes it is a black, shot by a brown, blamed on the white.
It's like what goes on everyday in this country...the left promulgating lies that come nowhere near the truth. You have so discredited yourself at this point that your thoughts on any subject are, quite frankly, worthless. You have only yourself to blame for your sorely lacking credibility.
Too late now the jury has spoken. No need crying over spilled Skittles. The trayvonites might as well be protesting to bring Trayvon back from the dead. I don't think that will happen either. They might as well learn to live with it.
it is sort of scary to realize there are people that are old enough to be selected for jury duty that would ignore the law and put innocent people in prison based on emotion. the irony is, they also use the injustice of innocent people being put to death as their defense against the death penalty. it is a hypocritical double standard being paraded around and rubbed in our faces.
The juror is just expounding on what those of us who have common sense already knew, Zimmerman is a dirtbag murderer and the justice system is crap and crumbled to bits. Now hopefully Florida can go bankrupt like Detroit did and force the State Government to tap into the vast number of retirees pensions to fund that racist state. Payback for Trayvon . So mote it be.
That's the way the cookie crumbles so no need to whine about it. Trayvon is gone and George is free. Time to move on .
Oh but it does. The law empowered Z to stalk the kid. Perhaps the jury did not take it into account, but the law was an "enabler" for Zimmerman to pursue and eventually kill the kid. It will happen again as long as there are laws like this and as long as there are "wannabe" cops out there.
Pure BS, unless you think like a woman and believe you know what men think. I can also guarantee you do not carry.
However, Trayvon had 4 minutes to go 90 yards, so enough of the stalking considering he got out of his car long after Trayvon was gone. Learn the case.
$he hope$ $he will not be a$$aulted by the Trayvonite$,and can maybe get $ome PAYOFF, a$ well, I'd wager....
There was so much reasonable doubt you could have driven a bus through it. Thank goodness the intelligent jurors swayed this emotional one.
Too late now even though the trayvonites are still belly aching. This juror is just trying to be a trayvonite hero but the damage is done. LOL!
Something called cash. The "justice" most poor person can't afford. The law will always protect you, so long as you can pay the fees.