Leading British medical journal ripped for calling women ‘bodies with vaginas’

When did I say I ""don't have a problem with the idea that reducing women to "people with vaginas" is totally wrong!"" ???

Hint: I didn't but you didn't have a good answer to my post so you drew a "conclusion" from nothing...

 

Well you didn't pull me up on saying that it is wrong to reduce women to bodies with vaginas! You only raised an issue with the Dad jokes! Plus, you seem like a pretty strong feminist, and MANY feminists do NOT like what The Lancet has done here - reducing women to bodies with vaginas! Then again, you may be one of these 'feminists' who think that men with penises are women too just because they say that they are!

 

How else would YOU distinguish them from trans females???????

 

It is medicine geared publication not children's comic.

 

You're forgetting those oh so supple and bee-stung lipped mouths. Besides it's "other" talents it generally looks and sounds beautiful and even emits wisdom quite often. Femininity is a rectangle

The Lancet is trying to make a point, which is that sex isn't gender, but like points of almost every kind on nearly everything it is several miles above most conservative's heads

 

George Washington would agree, though he did go on to become the richest man in America.

 

What the hell are you talking about?

 

How would I distinguish ACTUAL females from trans females? Easy: Trans females are men who think that they are women!

 

Another way is simply to say "women physically assigned as men" which avoids gratuitous insult and thus is something no conservative would ever do.

 

Conservatives tell the TRUTH!

 

LOLs ..

 

Except that that was done in humour, and wasn't published in a SCIENCE JOURNAL.

 

They are misogynists, not feminists.

 

How about 'woman'?

If you're uncertain what that means, in a world in which same are being systematically erased, here's the dictionary definition:

Adult Human Female.

 

They're women, so that's all the distinction needed.

That other lot are not women, obviously.

 

The problem with that definition is that the left believes that adult human MEN can become adult human FEMALES.

 

......reducing women to lumps of meat with a sex organ."


So it's OK to vilify, ridicule, denigrate women if you laugh about it???


No.

 

I get mixed up. Were we talking about men with vaginas or women with penises?

And lets not even start on the non-binaries. (though I have been told that they find it quite alright if you are attracted to their feminine/masculine elements, they believe that is the same as in any relationship)

 

I didn't see any vilifying or denigration

 

@FoxHastings is talking about the 'dad jokes' in the first 8 posts.

 

Are women not lumps of meat with a sex organ ? -- an organ for which society places a particularly high value.

This is exactly what women are - humans in general really .. not sure a Penis commands as high a value in the marketplace though.

This Nazi Feminist dehumanization trope ends up dehumanizing women .. desexualizing them for starters.. turning them into helpless victims to finish - when inappropriately used .. something that happened often .. which in part led to the demize of that horrible and nasty movement.

 

its official, we've come full circle. Modern medical journals now depict women the same way they were depicted in prehistory.

 

Nice!

 

You mean PROPER feminists?

 

That's not a problem with the definition ... that's a problem with people who indulge in fantasy as though it's real.