Leading British medical journal ripped for calling women ‘bodies with vaginas’

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by chris155au, Sep 29, 2021.

  1. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    post 92
     
  2. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It WAS, but how does that mean that the researchers WROTE it?
     
  3. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no buts. It's a referral to the researchers.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2021
  4. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How does that mean that the researchers WROTE it?
     
  5. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    wrote what?
     
  6. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How does that mean that the researchers WROTE "bodies with vaginas?"
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2021
  7. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the correct quote is "Historically, the anatomy and physiology of bodies with vaginas have been neglected"
    It's a referral to the researchers.
    Learn English if you don't get it.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2021
  8. Buri

    Buri Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,723
    Likes Received:
    6,426
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I get the feeling you've been, uh, neglecting them for a very long time. I believe you can fix this, and your posting may improve.
     
  9. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Who do you think wrote that?

    Obviously.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2021
  10. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're busy with shooting the messenger.
    Bravo

    So the end.
     
  11. Blinda Vaganto

    Blinda Vaganto Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    270
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    I remember reading a book called 'The man who mistook his wife for a hat'. We as a society must admit the truth that some people are insane, as well as some ideas. Not meaning to insult anyone, but unless we come to terms with this fact, we are doomed.
     
    chris155au likes this.
  12. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Lancet wrote it! Simple! :roflol:
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2021
  13. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And they accused the researchers of seeing it like that. Simple.
     
  14. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Quote them accusing the researchers of seeing it like that.
     
  15. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    read post 92.
     
  16. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Lancet said that the researchers have ignored the anatomy of women, but instead of using the word WOMEN it referred to "bodies with vaginas!" Simple!
     
    Buri likes this.
  17. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because that is how the researches saw them. Simple.
     
  18. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Where does it say that is how the researchers saw them?
     
  19. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It doesn't, and it's not needed since people have that knowledge.
    It's your own problem you're sub par.
     
  20. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And where are people getting that knowledge from?
     
  21. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    by looking it up.
     
  22. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Okay, so you looked it up. So then provide your source! Shouldn't be too hard, right?
     
  23. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=scientific+research+male+oriented

    Why is it, that you really do not know a thing and can't be bothered to look something up by yourself?
    I'm not your teacher.

    So at the bottom line it remains... the expressed "jaw drop" is just you lot not understanding the reference towards the scientific community by scientific newspaper. But you got your ignorant opinion ready. And specifically you show no effort to do something about to understand the subject.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2021
  24. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How does this mean that "bodies with vaginas" is, to quote you, "how the researches saw them?"
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2021
  25. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I already replied to this in post 119.
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2021

Share This Page