Writer Anthony Summers cited two prominent photographic experts who declare that they believe the photographs depicting Oswald holding the rifle that supposedly killed President Kennedy are fakes. Approximately 11:05 into the following first video shows one of these experts examining the photographs and submitting his evaluation. The first documentary was made by Anthony Summers from the BBC and is treated in his book Conspiracy. [video=youtube;xQkiAQeCPJw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQkiAQeCPJw&list=WL&index=31[/video] [video=youtube;aSmOS3BGFVo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSmOS3BGFVo[/video]
All debunked long ago. The pictures were quite real Marina Oswald even remembered taking them. No evidence whatsoever that they were fake and the experts are merely self proclaimed no bodies.
Bullocks!!! Marina Oswald has proven to be an unreliable witness. She was sequestered by the FBI and Secret Service for months and they brainwashed her into scapegoating her husband. End of story, Soupy.
Sorry but that s an outright lie. There is no evixence of such brainwashing and her memory of those pictures is quitd reliable. They are real pictures you cannot refute that fact without lying and that is the end of it.
so very true but WHY you feed him STILL after all this time giving him the attention he seeks is beyond me. blowing smoke indeed.I love that lie posted that its been debunked.somehow what EXPERT Photographers have said over the years doesnt count.only what HE says means it has been debunked.comedy gold and comedy logic,gotta love it. you took someone to school here who could only whine and cry in defeat in their post.
Her initial testimony was that she had no idea about the pictures. It was only after relentless hounding by FBI interrogators that she "remembered" what they told her to remember. That's FACT
in talking further about this post and someone that talks to himself all time,its funny how when you post videos full of pesky facts he cant get around,his standard trolling line for his rebuttals in defeat is the traditonal one liners consisting of-Its in the warren commission,its been debunked. which is the EXACT same thing as running off.so he DOES run off all the time crying in defeat. too bad one person here ignorantly keeps feeding the troll giving him the attention he seeks I see and I am not talking about you RS just so you know.
No one has posted pesky facts proving me wrong. You know the opposite is true. Everyone knows you and the other dingbat conspiracy nuts have been crushed by facts and evidence. This is why you pretend to ignore but then indirectly taunt. Embarrassing for you. Now go to the fast food joint and flip some burgers so mom will let you borrow her laptop again
exactly. that is funny,when he cant counter facts in videos and know he is defeated all he ever posts is lies saying that was debunked a long time ago. someone cant grasp that by saying this sentence- " that was debunked along time ago." is the exact same thing as admitting defeat and running off as he always does.
No as usual you were corrected with facts and cannot prove anything.' You hate it and now are acting like your buddy 911 and simply crying when beaten by facts - - - Updated - - - I always counter them and defeat you and your friends which is why you lie and claim to ignore me when in fact you read everything I post and then throw a tantrum
The photos that were run on the cover of Life magazine, poisoning the public's mind and perceptions when it came to the fall guy, Oswald, were indeed debunked but not in the way that a certain ridiculous troll would like to think. Photographic experts have shown how the CIA, or whoever did this job, simply pasted Oswald's head on a couple of staged photos (holding a communist newspaper and rifle, in case anyone didn't get the idea) and then released it to a mostly unaware populace. And the cover up goes on still. Guys like Gerald Posner, John Ziegler, Bill O'Reilly and James Swanson still churn out turgid crap that does nothing to challenge the Warren Commission fiction that Lee Oswald is exactly as they, the Warren Commission, portrayed him in their unconscionable cover up of the coup that murdered JFK.
Actually this is a false hood. The photographs were never debunked and have been shown time and time to be authentic and legitimate. The Warren COmmission conclusion was accurate and proven by evidence which is something you avoid like the plague
Changing people's testimony, altering it for the record, omitting certain facts, unwarranted attributions by the Warren lawyers and coercion by the Warren Committee were all hallmarks of the committee itself (not to mention the pertinent testimony the WC just didn't bother to deal with at all). Dallas sheriff deputy Roger Craig, who was among the first officers to reach the sixth floor of the Dallas School Book Depository, refused to bend to pressure and change his story, to match that of several other officers there who decided under oath that it was not a Mauser 7.65 rifle that had been found there but Oswald's alleged Manlicher-Carcano instead (even though Mauser had stamped it's brand and model number right on the gun barrel prominently for all to see all present attested to that, at first).http://jfkthelonegunmanmyth.blogspot.com/2013/01/roger-craig-vs-lone-gunman-zealots.html Twice Bill Craig testimony contradicted WC orthodoxy on vital matters. He also reported seeing Lee Harvey Oswald getting into a Nash Rambler station wagon and being driven away from the TSBD by a "dark complected white male" after the killing, matching the same report of at least four other witnesses, and totally wrecking an effort by the WC to establish a time line for Oswald after the shooting (so as to account for JD Tippit) and ruing the "lone killer" narrative they invented for him. Craig maintained that the WC altered his answers to the committee "at least a dozen times" and he was eventually fired by Dallas sheriff's Bill Decker after refusing to change his testimony like so many others had.
You can cite no example of any alteration or changing or omission of testimony because you never read the report and have no idea what is written in it. There is no evidence of any pressure on Bill Craig or anyone else to change their story you simply made it up and it ids a lie. The officers who actually found the weapon and recovered it voluntarily admitted to making a mistake and mis-identifying the rifle and there is no evidence of pressure or reason to believe in any. Bill Craig was also discredited and unreliable as evidence simply proves his claims false. But of course to the conspiracy fool anything which might dispute the Proven story is real and all the evidence is false. This is why you know nothing of the case and only cherry pick what fits your view
