" Liberalness ... a mental disorder "

So says Michael Savage.And I agree.Like L.B.J.'s Great Society
experiment in Welfare.Meant to slowly weed out inner city
doldrums like unwed mothers and absent fathers.Instead reaping
the exact opposite.Created More Unwed mothers and absent fathers
and now children who feel entitled to those easy welfare fruits.
A complete an utter sham.Yet Liberals still cling to their outrageous
claim of a Huge safety net that doesn't Help the Poor but rather
keeps them on the public dime to their own chagrin.
Obama expanding on that Great Society experiment ushering-in
a new historic level of Food Stamp dependency.
The very definition of a mental disorder.Doing the same nutty thing
and expecting a different result.

 

Hey- check out my signature!

 

Bill Maher. More people laugh at him, than with him, and he doesn't have the decency to ever stop stuttering out his self loathing masked as comedy...and let that sink in.

At least Jon Stewart is entertaining to the mindless sheep.

 

You are very correct, Foolardi.

Especially when you say, "L.B.J.'s Great Society experiment created more unwed mothers and absent fathers and now chcldren who feel entitled to those easy welfare fruits."

Lee Plaza Hotel
Once one of the most luxurious residential hotels in Detroit, Lee Plaza closed in the 1990s.

This is what the liberal Democrats often do when they foolishly tax and spend and drive the middle class out of the central business districts of the urban cities ... America's Beautiful, Horrible Decline courtesy of the foolish, tax and spend and very misguided liberal Democrats!



"Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. More than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.

In order to break the Democrats' stranglehold on the black vote and free black Americans from the Democrat Party's economic plantation, we must shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity."

http://www.time.com/time/photogaller...850982,00.html

 

They mean well.... I believe that a vast majority of the liberal people that I have met, (even my insanely liberal uncle) really do want to help people. I think that the fundamental reason they go off the rails, is because they all really do believe that utopia is possible. That with enough money, govt regulation, education, and perhaps selective breeding, you really CAN have a perfect society. One in which no one is poor, or starving, or without a job, home, car, etc.

If your philosophy starts with that premise, then a lot of the things that they do, that do not turn out well start to make more sense. If you believe that utopia is possible, and that liberalism is the WAY that you get there, then why on earth would you deviate from your game plan.... ever? To do anything differently would not be adhering to liberal ideas, ergo... away from utopia.

It would also make sense why anyone that might disagree with their liberal policies are either evil people, or just stupid and need to be educated. After all ... nothing really can beat utopia can it? It is only when you accept that utopia is not possible (which it certainly is NOT) can you start to use critical thinking to reason if the actions you are taking have a net positive or negative effect. Only then can you think about what you are trying to achieve, and what is possible... and what it not.

I have mentioned this before... in some ways liberalism more closely resembles a religious order rather than a political group. And their orthodoxy is the core belief that utopia is possible, and must always be striven for, no matter what the costs or consequences are. Which leads to bizarre things you will hear said occasionally like ensuring that no one is poor by taking money from everyone untill everyone has the same amount. If utopia is your goal, then the ends will always justify the means. Just like in most religious orders...

 

Utopia is not possible, but why don't try to make moves to get closer to this? Instead of accepting the things as they are, trying to change it.

It is like if someday you get ill, and you say, well I will pray to God and accept this, and maybe I will be cured.

Or, you're ill, and you decide to adopt measures to fight this situation, going to the doctor, investigating for your own...

And here is the difference between the left and the right.

 

I think you're mistaken about most liberals. I am a liberal and I am certainly aware that a utopia is not possible. The world is not perfect, and I don't want it to be. That would be boring.

 

You nailed it.

 

How stupid can you be? You do know that utopia is not real, and that conservatives don't really
believe that liberals want utopia, So just for you *******s I will explain the use of the word
utopia that conservatives use.

Utopia is un-achievable, expecily for man. hence we use this word to explain how your policies never
achieve the goal you're seeking for. (to rid our society of inequities) you have seen Detroit, and CA.
and many other city's and states run by the left, right?. Your own policies create disasters, while
at the same time you libs call it social justice. Since you can't ever achieve what your gaol is
(social justice) we make fun of you by calling it your utopia,(un-achievable) and what do you do?
you take the word literally.


...

 

Yep, we're crazy like that, foolman. We like to allow people to fly their freak flag.

 

Without liberals there wouldn't be anyone to star in the bad movies that I like to critic so much.

 

Without cons we'd be rid of bad realities like BS wars, economic depressions, hate, murder, torture, stuff like that.

 

Stop comparing your dreams to reality.

 

Dreams? I think that is a good definition of what represent the conservatism. Wars, persecution of humans only for their origin(immigration), a lot of importance of religion, teocracy lovers, torture lovers, anti-individual freedoms(except for that people that they consider citiziens, normally people with money)

And it is what we've been seeing in the history, and the positions defended by many conservative in this forum. It is just a summary of what they represent.

 

Notice the highlighted word, "think." I love it when liberals "think" to know what conservative platforms are. If you had a clue, you probably wouldn't be as clueless.

 

Well, I am based in what many of the conservative in this forum opined, and I think that they would support what I've told without problems.

How many of you would like to put an electrified fence in Mexico? Or directly shoot to them? How many of conservative would like that religion have more importance in politics? A recent post of a conservative was defending this.

I've seen the opinions of many conservative, many the strongest. I've seen how absurd is the president of Texas...

I've seen the doom ideas of Ron Paul and his libertarianism. His economic ideas only would bring to poverty to most of the workers.

I've seen the doings of George Bush, Reagan and others. So how can you say I am wrong in my analysis, if the facts, the history confirms what I've said.

 

Typical ******* right-wing troll thread.

 

When you say things like torture lovers and anti-individual freedoms, why else wouldn't I call that person clueless. You have an idea of what you think you know about conservatives. Don't don't really have a complete idea.

You just base your assumptions on what you've heard from a few random people on a forum. My guess you've never taken the time to learn about your opposition, you just sat back and just assumed or reacted badly to whatever you didn't like. You're are like a surgeon who have never been in an operating room. Never done an operation before but somehow you know everything there is to know about open heart surgery.

So go ahead. Tell me what you think you know about me.

 

We have direct Historic proof that Democrat Mayors,to a person,
especially in the Big melting pot cities have ruined those cities with
their Great Society crapola.Just compare Big Urban city run by Republican
Mayor vs. Democrat Mayor.No finer proof needed.
I rest me case.

 

You lefties act like we never tried the Liberal Great Society approach.
Again ... talk about mental disorders.

 

Not exactly,he dint properly finish that train of thought.
So,I will.The world need'nt be perfect.Just free from as many Liberals
as humanely possible.Is all.

 

Why can't you do both?

 

Which party has started the most wars during the last century or so?

The rest of your post is too silly to even respond to.

 

You can . But you understand what I mean.

 

Unfortunately I do.