Make homosexuality illegal?

You just don't prove things to those who mock....it is a waste of time.

 

not always.

in prison male rape is an issue of power, not sex.

 

and so are pedophiles by your own logic. It is a behavior....not a product of birth. Civilized Human beings control their behavior. Some are born with a propensity to rob banks. There are consequences to behavior in whatever form. The fact you prefer one behavior over another does not make any difference.

 

I find that repulsive....is that normal I ask?Is it power that gives them an erection and not sex??? Does the same hold true for beastiality?? Power over harmless animals? I say it is all repulsive deviations from the norm.

 

Sure thing. This thread sucks anyway. But before I go, I will just say the world was better off when you all were still in the closet.

 

Rape isn’t sex. It’s rape.

 

I’m not mocking you. Don’t confuse derision with mockery.

What you’re saying here is that you can’t prove your assertion unless the person you’re proving it to has an open mind. Where have I heard that sort of thing before?

Please form an understanding of how proof works. When you prove something, the facts will speak for themselves and no matter how hostile the person you’re speaking to is, they will be unable to deny facts.

So lay some facts on me, and prove that homosexuality is a perversion. I suggest you start with showing why your concept of perversion is accurate and correct compared to others.

Or we can skip this whole **** barrel exercise and you can come out and admit that your hate homosexuals and you don’t have any solid reason why, you just do.

 

In all actuality, considering the definition, interaction between those of the same sex is not sex either....it is something else.

 

The definition includes anal sex and doesn’t specify that it be between a man and a woman, so, wrong.

 

The purpose of natural sex is to bond two people of the opposite sex together in a relationship for which they were created. That relation ship cannot be recreated by any other combination. Man on man, women on women man on dog women on horse....the list is endless. Sex between a man and women not only bonds them relationally, but it can also result in the reproduction of life.......and that bond helps to ensure the protection of that young life. Therein lies the purpose of it all. There is a purpose to this "natural function' that is not replicated by any other relation. You can come out and admit you hate "traditional family" or prove otherwise. If I am wrong about what I have said.....you prove it!
There is no purpose to the idea of what you promote as "sex" other than to fulfill "immediate gratification". If you can site an end purpose....prove it! Natural sex most definitely culminates in something long term and fulfilling. Your brand is nothing more than mutual masterbation.

 

Again please learn how proof and facts work. What you just posted was virtually one hundred percent YOUR personal idea of how things are supposed to work. No facts or data were presented, just a meandering chain of assertion logic that concluded with a demand to be proven wrong.

Further, my demand was that you prove homosexuality is a perversion and you didn’t even approach that subject.

I have a number of questions.

What Is “natural sex” and why do you get to decide it’s purpose?

How do you explain the instances of homosexual activity found among animals?

On of my big criticisms is that you are talking about natural sex but you ignore the rest of nature. Plenty of examples of homosexual activity. Countless examples of sex not creating any bond between mates and definitely not ensuring the protection of the young. The sexual behavior of the rest of the animal kingdom throws a huge wrench into your assertion that natural sex is what you say it is.

Could it be that things don’t really work the way you suggest, and you just want to define what is and isn’t natural as a tool to hate homosexuals?

 

Anal sex is not sex. It is masterbation. A knothole in a tree would be the same thing......it is not sex. (The knothole, however, would be a whole lot cleaner)

 

You self explain the idea I have laid out. I view humans as having a far greater purpose than "the animals". You view them as our equals. Male bears often eat their young so you must condone that behavior as well. If not ....prove it! It is your logic, not mine.

 

I have a question for you. You are fond of the animal kingdom and so am I. I just don't equate their behavior with mine. That is how we are different.
I own two male dogs I am quite fond of. One of them is shown in my avatar. They are a great breed.....Catahoulas. They often play and joust with one another in a friendly manner. Sometimes it culminates in one humping the other (though I really don't know if they understand any purpose in what they are doing. Especially since they were both neutered at a young age.)
My question for you. "Since you view animal behavior as a devise on which we can measure our own, do you ever engage in sports activities with other members of the same sex? If so....while doing so, do you find it compulsive to dry hump one of your team mates after he scores a basket? I just wonder. And if so, do you find that action acceptable among your peers? Among other observers??

 

Oh yawn. Humans are animals. Other animals have claws and teeth and muscles. We have a big brain. Enough with the special purpose bullshit. Thats just another assertion I’m going to demand you prove, and we both know you have no facts with which to prove it.

 

So heterosexual sex with children is OK ????


BTW, having sex with children is illegal.

 

Sex with children is already illegal.....what don't you get about that?

What don't you get about the topic isn't pedophilia?

 

What you’re describing is a phenomenon created by cultural norms, not instinct. If I wanted to dry hump people in public the only thing that would stop me would be consequences. Since I am in fact a heterosexual despite your presumption otherwise, I would not have any urge to dry hump my teammates. However I often have the urge to engage in sexual intercourse with women I see every day. Again, the only thing stopping me is consequences. Society frowns on that behavior and I am part of that society. I also firmly believe in consent as a right and requirement, but again that is something valued by society so I adopt it as one of my values as well.

Humans have the same instincts as your dogs. We just have large brains and the instinct to band together and form stable societies as a survival mechanism. One instinct overrules the other. You have mistaken rules created and adhered to for the sake of a stable society as a greater purpose. You have mistake cultural norms as divine mandate. You have mistaken what society finds acceptable as a dividing line between what is natural and what is unnatural.

But societies change. Old rules die and new rules are adopted and society is none the worse for wear after the transition turmoil passes. One day people will look back on our argument and wonder what the **** we are even talking about.

 

I dare the 4 people who voted YES to admit it.

 

Pedophilia is only a problem with the Catholic Church?

 

Yeah, why should it?

 

You are either a very dim bulb in the Christmas Tree of life or enjoy shoving your fouls words into the mouths of others. Of course there is the most obvious explanation in that the topic is uncomfortable enough for you to avoid through pathetic distraction

 

Agreed with this. Too many authoritarians on both sides pushing laws to tell Americans what to think, what to believe and how to live.

 

BJs and cunnilingus are also perversions...at least according to those who believe sex is only for procreation.

 

So, if we're talking about banning heterosexual sex you'd immediately think about women having sex with boys?

It's illegal for adults to have sex with minors. Period. This is why so many female teachers have gotten into trouble banging their students.