McCarthy to green light Biden impeachment inquiry this week

A failure of the spineless Republicans in the Senate to convict Trump does not mean it was a "false" impeachment.

It was a "false" Senate trial where it had been decided before the impeachment was even voted on in the House that Trump would be acquitted.

 

I watched two false impeachments based on lies in the news. The Democrats made the word Impeachment a joke.

 

What you watched were two LEGITIMATE impeachments lied about by the RW.

 

Ah, so the Republicans have nothing at the moment, by your analysis .

So all their propaganda to date has been just that, false, unsupported BS.

Good to know.

 

In the United States — impeachment is successful once it clears the House, it cannot be “false”.

Not to mention trumps first impeachment was the first in the history of the United States to be done with a bipartisan consensus. His second likewise was the second.

The only reason the second impeachment (which again, was successful) didn’t clear the Senate was because they held off the hearing until after he was removed from office by the people of this nation — they had the votes to convict him.


With the Biden impeachment inquiry they have the opposite issue — there is a bipartisan consensus against in in both the House and the Senate due to lack of evidence.

 

False, they were false impeachments based on irrational hatred. Welcome to the world dems created. Impeachments mean nothing now.

 

Absolutely true. And the Orange Stain proved what a crooked whimpering little bitch he was and is when he tried to third-world his way into a second term with criminal acts for which he is now on trial.

Welcome to the world the Republicans created.

 

Try this one:
“Republicans Say It’ll Take A Lot More Than Eyewitness Testimony, Records, Audio, Video, Complete Confessions, Documents, Indictments and Convictions For Them To Believe Trump Did Anything Wrong"
Courtesy of bx4

 

Yep... 2 bipartisan Senate conviction votes, 1 set of gutless GOP Senators...

It's ultimately a useless process if those empowered to take it seriously, don't....

 

I have been watching this thread to see what developments the House Republicans can come up with and so far it's been mostly hot air.
What has been a little disturbing is the rhetoric from the committee members. I don't like it when they try to deceive us, and that's what it seems they are trying to do.
What about the whistleblowers? The witnesses? The records?
Granted it does take time to investigate all the records, but why try to paint a picture when you know there isn't enough paint for it?
Talk about a witch hunt!

 

You honestly believe the Dems had credible impeachment attempts? Wow, it's not going well over there.

How serious is a blow job in the Oval office? Just a minor infraction?

 

I don't know. How serious do you think it is ?

 

Why do you guys always thing Trump gets Biden off for you or something, can't you defend him on his own?

 

We don't. We're just exploring your standards so we can effectively reply to your accusations.

 

And humor seems to escape you

 

I'm still waiting for you to inform me of what I have gotten wrong, I'll stand behind my post. What have I gotten wrong about the entire Biden matter?

 

And how is the evidence presented not actual, I have yet to see it actually refuted. Do you have anything actual to refute it? Can you yet explain for what the Biden family was ACTUALLY receiving tens of millions of dollars from our worst foreign adversaries, I'd be real interested in the ACTUAL explanation then have given.

 

The check the Comer presented as "proof' that Joe Biden was getting kickbacks and/or bribes has been completely debunked. Jim Biden was repaying a loan from his brother. What's worse is that Comer knew that but lied about it anyway.

Every other piece of "evidence" presented by the Republicans trying to tie Biden to some sort of bribery scheme falls in the same boat. They'll claim its proof of something when, in fact, it's not proof of anything.

The story that, as Vice President, Joe Biden had the Ukraine prosecutor general fired because he was investigating Hunter Biden and/or Burisma has been debunked more times that I can count.

All of your claims are baseless. If they had any merit whatsoever then the GOP in the House would have impeached him already.

 

Why don't you know? Do you approve of such behaviour from the, allegedly, top job in the world?

 

Why are you answering a question with a question and not an answer ?

 

And you derived that SOLELY based on the fact that the memo field on the check says "loan repayment"............what utter folly.

Show me the check from Joe to Jim where he lent the money and the documents they both signed covering the debt and repayment.

Then show me the proof that all the bank records, and emails and text messages are false and where they were debunked not just your empty baseless claims. Link me to where the Bidens have come out and explained it all.

Then you can't count past zero because it has only by bouyed by the ever mounting evidence that has been presented.

Why would they have impeached him already when they have barely scratched the surface and only recently been granted full subpoena power?

Have you read that a payment of $40,000 from Chinese money has been been tied directly into The Big Guys personal checking account? Are you going to dismiss that one out of hand too? Or perhaps your news sources are keeping that one and the evidence hidden too.

Follow $40,000 From Communist China Directly To Joe Biden’s Bank Account

The $40,000 Joe ‘the Big Guy’ Biden received was exactly 10 percent of the $400,000 Hunter Biden received from CEFC.

Joe Biden received $40,000 from Chinese communists, funneled through his son and brother and their businesses, House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer revealed Wednesday morning....

A 12-page memorandum from the Oversight Committee’s staff to the majority members of the committee, which The Federalist has reviewed, details the latest development Comer summarized in his video and press release. The bottom line is a $40,000 check from Sara and James Biden’s personal checking account written to Joe Biden on Sept. 3, 2017, claiming to represent a “loan repayment.” But following that money upstream reveals it originated from the Chinese “business” partners Hunter Biden had threatened a little over a month earlier in a WhatsApp message....



..
Significantly, the House memorandum also established that the $40,000 used to supposedly repay a loan to Joe Biden came solely from funds the communist China-connected CEFC paid to Hunter Biden to “cooperate with the family.” The House Oversight staff’s memorandum made that point clear by detailing, in addition to the flow of funds from CEFC to Joe Biden, the balances in the various accounts prior to the receipt of those funds.

For instance, before Sara Biden transferred $50,000 into their personal checking account from which they paid Joe Biden $40,000, their balance was $46.88. And before Hunter Biden transferred the $150,000 into the Lion Hall Group bank account, that account showed a balance of $1,964.62.

So whether James and Sara Biden actually owed Joe Biden $40,000 is irrelevant because the money they used to repay the supposed loan came from the Chinese company that Hunter and James groomed to serve as the family cash cow during Joe Biden’s vice presidency. And CEFC only provided that capital after Hunter Biden — saying he and his father were sitting there trying to understand why the promised $10 million hadn’t yet materialized — threatened their Chinese counterparts.

It’s also interesting to note that the $40,000 Joe “the Big Guy” Biden received was exactly 10 percent of the $400,000 Hunter Biden received from CEFC.
https://thefederalist.com/2023/11/0...st-china-directly-to-joe-bidens-bank-account/

The CEFC money in the infamous "10% for The Big Guy" memo...

Read my sig

 

Dude - Trump is facing 91 indictments. Each one comes with a reference to a specific federal or state code.
Which code paragraph do you think Biden violated?

 

Dude - nothing about Trump mitigtes anything about the Bidens influence and money laundering and RICO violations. I note you ignored the $40,000 money funnel why was that?

 

None of that happened, thats left wing propaganda.

 

Compared to what Trump did in the Oval Office, a blow job should be reason for a medal... Blow jobs... That's so quaint...

Yes, I honestly believe the Dems had "credible impeachment attempts"... as did a few Reps, who said (and voted that) the Dems made the case..

I can certainly see how the uninformed would have a problem with Impeachment #1, although Trump was later determinied internally to have broken the law by withholding Ukrainian funds the way he did.

Impeachment 2 speaks for itself...