Meghan Markle’s real name uncovered as baby Archie’s birth certificate goes public

The Men in the Royal Family have certainly gotten open-minded since the days of Lady Diana undergoing a "Virginity Exam".

Meghan was married before and every greasy producer in Hollywood had her.

Miss Markle clearly has "Skills".

 

Source?

 

Megan had a very close relationship with her father as long as he was giving her everything she wanted - including private schools. She dropped him when she married Harry over some letter he wrote to the Queen asking her to tell Merkel to please speak to him - I'm not sure though. Merkel probably used it as an excuse to separate herself from her family. Sociopaths do that!

Megan had illusions about herself, otherwise she wouldn't have gone after Prince Harry who was socially way above her - which again is a sociopath trait. Compare that with Kate and how humble she was knowing she was entering an almost forbidden sphere - yet her families social status was way above Merkels.

When William broke up with Kate so he could be sure about his relationship, Kate accepted it humbly, even though it pained her. But when Prince William told Harry to separate for a while, Merkel blew a fuse and never spoke to William again. It was as if, "how dare you destroy my relationship with my great catch."

Also Merkel's lack of gratitude and loyalty - even to the queen who gave her a phenomenal wedding. Again, it was as if Merkel thought it was her due because she's marrying her grandson. But that's how sociopaths are, there is no gratitude of loyalty.

Anyway, you asked what my opinion is based on, well it's based on two women, one in my family and who I know intimately. They can be enormously likeable and will deceive and use people for whatever they can gain, until they feel they are of no use to them, and then they'll drop them like a hot potato. It seems this is what happened.

The truth though is that the upper class in Britain excels in snobbery and cuttingness, so I'm sure Merkel went through a lot that she didn't expect - especially from Camilla. Boy, Markel must have met her nemesis there.

 

So, you're basing your opinion of a woman you've never met on gossip, rumor, and comparisons to the the personalities of your own family members? How nice.

Seriously, you don't know her, so why the hate?

No wonder she and Harry want OUT.

 

I'm convinced all those commonwealth creatures are just waiting for their governments to fail so they can get on their knees for these royals...

 

I’m just glad I live in the age where royalty is akin to a bad reality tv show, and not ruling by divine right.

 

Meghan Markle’s real name uncovered as baby Archie’s birth certificate goes public

Didn’t the wench say that she would never live in the US so long as Trump is president?

The family is currently residing in Los Angeles as Prince Harry bids to disconnect from his royal family and live a less intrusive life. They had previously lived in Canada after leaving England.

Harry and Meghan don’t want to live in LA until Trump leaves office
By Tamar Lapin

January 12, 2020 | 11:19pm


That’s pathetic. The ex royal (not capitalized on purpose) couple can’t even keep their word for 3 months. Gutless, no integrity, uncommitted, weak, no conviction, unethical, worthless, fake, all bark no bite, wimps, etc. Sort of reminds me of the entire left.

 

Well, imagine the equipment manager for the local high school trying to stitch the name The Artist Formerly Known as Prince on the back of a jersey.

On a side note do you guys think Emilio Estevez approves of father Ramon and brother Carlos changing their names to Martin Sheen and Charlie Sheen respectively?

 

The guy is letting himself be lead around by his pecker. It's his pecker. It's his right to let himself be lead around with. He's not as smart as he's allowed to be but it's his pecker.

 

Gee.....lots of vitriol. I do not 'hate' her. I have an opinion that she is a flake. She dissed her step-sister, and her Father. Now, she has taken a Royal off the pattern for 'Royals,' especially in a 'Family' way. Why has this happened? Simple. Meghan, having got her celebrity male handbag, produced a Son with him, said, "Harry, I am tired of opening fetes revealing plaques and all that crap. Let's go to Canada......and by the way, you can come if you like, or not, but I am taking our Son Archie with me." Harry abandons his steeped traditions.

Now, Canada is not good enough. Off to Tinsel Town where she was almost a nothing before fanny forking with dumb arse Harry. So, she arrives back in Town and indirectly declares, 'Look at me now. Take me seriously, because I have Harry on my arm.'

Easy to say, I know, but I predicted the Diana/Charles stupidity would end in disaster, and it did. This will be no different.

Harry, get your balls back and piss the nothing tramp off, just like she has with her own Father.

Simple as that.

 

You've still not explained why you care. You must feel pretty strongly to bother to create a thread about two complete strangers who have nothing to do with you and your feelings are clearly extremely pejorative and negative. I can't see the statement "Piss off 'Rachell,' you really are a piece of work." as anything other than an expression of hatred.

You also seem to be making a whole load of assumptions (all negative of course) about what the people involved think and their motives for doing what they do (or what you imagine they do). I can only presume you're basing this on the vapid tabloid coverage but none of that is in any way reliable. They will happily make stuff up if it generates a better headline which makes them more money (this being a classic example since her "real" name doesn't appear to have been any kind of secret before now).

None of this is healthy, for people like you who get so worked up about it, for the targets of the media-spun hatred (who aren't always royals or celebrities you might like to think deserve it) or for wider society in general as this kind of thing is presented as acceptable and spreads to our relationships with each other.

 

Ahhhh.... that's the piece I was missing. I knew people bought tabloids, but I thought it was for the giggles. There are people who actually believe they are non-fiction? LOL.... Knock me over with a feather.

 

At last we agree on something.

 

It's not a matter of support. It's a matter of the personalities who over step it and their lack of loyalty to anyone and everyone.

 

It's not hate, it's my personal knowledge of sociopaths and how they are. As an example, when I was young and on the Grand Jury in Brooklyn, I recall girls coming in one after another and accusing different men of wrong doing. Not knowing any differently, I believed the girls of course, but not the black women. They immediately knew they were prostitutes and were lying, since they shouldn't have been on that street at that time of night..

I do think Markel was going through hell in London, but she asked for it when she overstepped her bounds, and didn't care what it might do to Harry and the royal family. Yet with all that, the Queen did give her a royal wedding - and she should have had some gratitude.

I don't believe the Queen has seen Harry's son. Megan said he was too young to travel to be with the family at Christmas, and yet to insult the queen and the family, they took off on a jet for elsewhere. I know Megan doesn't talk to her father, and he hasn't seen the child - even though she lived with him for years and he paid for her tuition at private schools and college.

To top it off, she insulted her father's sacrifices by telling young girls that she worked herself through school. Right now she has a public relation firm working for her in the US, so I'm sure this knowledge is being covered up - but not in Britain.

Her intent is probably to destroy the royal family since they haven't given her everything she feels is her due for marrying the Prince - and what is her due? Probably to declare Archie next in line for the throne. If I was Kate and William, I would watch their children like a hawk.

 

She didn't know her place? LOL

 

If ones moral character means nothing to you, then why not open the jails and let it be a free for all?

Our Founding Fathers wanted a country ruled not by nobility of birth, but nobility of character. I don't see it! What I see is a bunch of sociopaths with 'god' complexes trying to control the world.

GREETINGS!​

At least I had nothing to gain,
not money or elusive fame,
can those in charge now say the same?

My problem was I feared my head
that I might lose it and be dead
and gave away my rights instead.

And this is why you foolish folk
are looked upon now as a joke
controlled by every criminal bloke

who can buy the media - Jeannette

​

 

Ah - I didn't know she was a criminal. What did she do? How many years was she sentenced for? How was she able to escape? Why haven't they caught her? She's not hard to find.

 

I didn't say she was a criminal, sociopaths usually aren't - although they make great con artists. Anyway if you can't see anything wrong with her moral values, it doesn't say much for you - at least to me. But then again neither did those Megan befriended, until she had no more use for them.

 

When was she diagnosed as a sociopath? What moral values is she lacking? Do you know the queen personally? What inside information do you have? By all accounts, they are very happy, and Harry has been historically a bit rebellious against royalty, long before Megan came along.

 

IE: You support it. You believe rumors spread by people that think just like you do. "over stepped her bounds" says a lot more about you and those that tout it than it does Meghan. It's people like you that is the reason racism still exists. Or didn't you know that? Every hear the phrase "uppity negro"? How do you think that phrase came about? By people that believe the same as you. Put the word "Meghan" in place of "negroes" and you sound just like a white supremacist. Is that really what you want? How does your "moral values" compare now? Sure doesn't look good to me. Hope that you realize just how wrong you are on this. If you don't...well...you're not worth wasting my time on.

 

too funny


Harry and Meghan’s website gaffe as they launch new foundation
https://www.news.com.au/entertainme...n/news-story/979454e22bff36827e27fa9e567a4bdf

 

I gave you examples of Megan's character in a previous post, I don't know why I have to repeat it. I did make one mistake though, Queen Elizabeth did see baby Archie when he was born. I don't know if she saw him afterwards.

 

You spouted a bunch of fiction from tabloids. What do you actually KNOW, first hand? Are you seriously telling me that the Weekly World News and the like are fact-based journalism?

I'm interested in what you know, personally. Otherwise, you have nothing but wishful thinking and wild assumptions based on tabloids.

 

I only heard the term uppity negro used by blacks. I do know some uppity whites though and they have the same illusions of grandeur as Megan Markle.

Can I ask you something, did I mention blacks in any of my posts? If Meghan was 100% white with exactly the same background and character traits she has now, would you think differently of her then? I think you would, but I wouldn't. I would have the same exact opinion of her as I have now - so who would be the racist then?