Your entire argument is based on opinion, fallacies and incredulity. You display no physics, forensics or mathematics to prove your claims. Tell me: in your opinion, how did my friend's DNA and personal effects end up inside the Pentagon wreckage?
You really don't get it because you have an emotional investment in the loss of your friend and so you miss the important information in this case.
Except you're not providing any important information. Just answer the question. It's a good one: how did his friend's DNA and personal effects end up inside the Pentagon wreckage?
again a horse before the cart argument. And I could very well ask of the loyalist in this forum how do you explain the lack of aircraft bits on the Pentagon lawn? the stuff recovered from the pentagon lawn constitutes less than 1% of the mass of the big Boeing, WHY?
G-bob, I'm not asking you to provide any evidence to back up this claim. Please stop dodging and answer the question: Tell me: in your opinion, how did my friend's DNA and personal effects end up inside the Pentagon wreckage?
This question is exactly like upon noticing that cash is missing from the vault the bank manager demands to know ALL details of the case. no cart before the horse thank you very much. not happening, there is no answer to your question until some much more basic bits get taken care of.
I'm not demanding details. I'm asking your opinion. Do you need to contact someone to tell you what your opinion is?
Insufficient data. Fact: she boarded AA77 Fact: her remains were found in the crash site in the Pentagon. What other data do you need to form an opinion? Need to make a call? Waiting for someone to tell you how to answer?
even if you went to the airport to see her off, and watched her board the aircraft, there are so many thing that could have happened, that its futile to speculate, the fact is that she is gone and now there lingers the question as to who the perpetrators really are, because the angry Arabs explanation doesn't work.
So you just admitted that the parts found were from a Boeing. - - - Updated - - - Angry Arabs kill lots of people so why doesn't that work?
First of all my statement was " the stuff recovered from the pentagon lawn constitutes less than 1% of the mass of the big Boeing, " I did NOT specify that the parts alleged to be from an airliner where in any way proven to be from an airliner. also, the angry Arabs flying hijacked airliners in the manner described in the official story and also crashing in the manner described in the official story and also causing the sort of damage described in the official story - simply isn't happening a huge string of low probability & implausible ( how about impossible) and all of these events strung together make the attack of 9/11/2001. right, you know of course that this amounts to rolling snake eyes 1,000,000 times in a row. Hijacked airliners were NOT used on 9/11/2001 the whole hijacking bit was an excuse to create Home Land Security & the TSA why isn't it called AIRPORT SECURITY why Transportation Security? because then they get to take over ALL transport in the U.S.A. and you don't believe that total control is the goal, the perpetrators hate our Freedom! ok, exactly who are the perpetrators?
Your sig line is clearly anti statist, however, your agenda appears to be in alignment with the wholesale consolidation of central control in the U.S.A. and for that matter the planet, all of the industrialized nations have similar problems with creeping authoritarianizm.
thats cause the ones that defend the official version everyday on message boards are paid shills,hense why they always ignore facts and have to lie all the time.the people in real life that wont accept,are in denial syndrome.
correction there,the airliners alone could not have brought the towers down,one of the main desginers who participated in the construction of the towers said they were designed so that they would remain standing if MULTIPLE airliners struck them and they remained standing there after those airliners allegedly hit them for over an hour. they did not topple to all the explosives went off later on from the basements that many witnessed. - - - Updated - - - the truth hurts you obviously.hee hee
OK, please enlighten me, just exactly what is it that you are trying to express using the little cartoon character in your post?
My $0.02 worth for this thread, its a fact that if any sentient beings at all question the official explanation of events for 9/11/2001, then it should be investigated, however it does lend weight to the argument, Military officers, or for that matter firefighters or any group with significant standing in this world can question the official story and thereby focus attention on something that needs be properly investigated, not the silly white-wash job that was done the first time.
Then they should launch their own investigation, as dozens of other independent researchers have done worldwide. Ask them to take a break from fundraising and do some examining.
There is a difference between a group of civilians getting together and investigating an event, and say the Congress & the Courts doing the job, what needs to happen here is for a body with authority to call witnesses and compel testimony to do the job, and do it right. Maybe this job needs to be done by an entity outside the USA, possibly the UN, or?
Like i said before,somehow those kind of people experts in their fields,what they say means absolutley nothing to them.their warped logic they have is if the corporate controlled media and the government say it happened this way and who was behind it,its automatically true. they should start a comedy club.
I would consider that there are experts in various fields, such as but not limited to controlled demolition, Danny Jowenko is a credible source (rip) and also, I consider David Ray Griffin to be an expert witness on the subject of logic & reason. Have you ever paid a visit to the Patriots Question 9/11 web-page? Experts abound, people with advanced degrees have signed up as experts for AE911Truth. the fact that you say there are no "exp-erts" speaks volumes! Just to let you know, Ya, I'm one of those "no-bodies" who have no special claim to fame as an expert, however I can see that the official story of 9/11/2001 = FRAUD. this is not rocket science, people can get this, if they didn't sleep through science 101.
