Milo Yiannopoulos disinvited from CPAC slot amid tape controversy

A. Muslims do NOT worship Mohammed, call one a Mohammedan nowadays and you'll find that out. They revere him but they worship no one but God

B. Mohammed married a 6 year old and one of the Crusader Kings married a 9 year old. That was done fairly often back then. You should realize that marriage for sex and love was considered quite unusual for anyone that had any property to speak of in ALL medieval cultures, even the freaking CHINESE; most marriages were arranged, and done to unite families and assure support for women, who weren't allowed to work.

 

Muhammad had sex with a 9year old little girl. Muslims worship Muhammad.. Whats the misunderstanding?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F13gtjjDEgE

 

Then perhaps you should post to someone else.

 

In modern times, the newlyweds play peekaboo.

 

They do? I thought he was viewed as a prophet. Perhaps I am not watching enough unhinged, unfounded YouTube videos.

 

A petty distinction. Insult Mohammed in some way (like drawing a picture of him) and see the reaction you get.
So Muslims revere a pedophile....the point still remains.

I wouldn't call it "common" exactly, and no one is revering a nameless Crusader king so that rationalization doesn't really hold up.

You are correct here though I don't know why the Chinese, of all people, are seen as a surprising non exception to this cultural rule.

 

Yes and everyone in today’s society doesn’t believe that the actions and words of the crusader king (or anyone else) is relaying gods word and is someone to emulate your life around.

The same can not be said for Muslims and Mohammed..

 

Because China was considered about as far off as the moon to most people. The average person didn't even know it existed, therefore it seems to indicate that something was a really widespread custom if even they did it.

A major problem I see with conservatives regarding Muslims is that you take the fact that the religion has these really strong tendencies to oppress women (and do other bad things) and you generalize it to every single Muslim that exists anywhere in the world. All of these things ARE done by Islam and done to the extent that it's a Very Big Problem, but SO DOES CHRISTIANITY, not to the same extent but it still remains a Big Problem in Christianity nonetheless. The important thing to remember is that not every Christian is a Branch Davidian and not every Muslim is in the Taliban.

 

Please share your research. Provide a source that he is a "Nazi sympathizer" and "antisemite".

 

I, personally, am outraged. Milo is being discriminated against. CPAC being afraid of his commentary doesn't speak well of CPAC. Milo is provacative, on purpose. I respect the prerogative of the CPAC folks to invite their speakers, but disinviting someone on the basis of a false narraive driven by the left wing who mischaracterized his commentary is unsupportable.

I doubt that Milo supports in any way sexual predation of minors. He's said as much, and continues to attempt to clear the public record of charges that he does. It's a lie. Also one that seem extraordinarilly vindictive of the liberal LGBT communty who believe that there can never be conservative voices that are gay in this country. F them.

 

Look! a lib screaming racist at a gay immigrant Jew who has a black BF.

You must take irony pills every morning.

 

Whoa, rimshot!

 

CPAC has been an arm of the RP establishment for a long time now. The Big Government RP/DP establishment opposes Donald Trump.

All this Milo bashing is just another absurd hissy fit from the Never Trump camp. It will have no impact on Trump, and may not even put much of a dent in Milo.

 

Defending a child molester defender? What a joke. Let me ask, do you think Pizzagate was real? If so, how can you possibly contain this level of hypocrisy in your self?

 

What wikileaks emails are not real?
Or to put it another way, which wikileaks emails have been denied by the alleged sender or receiver?

Then to answer your question, yes, pizzagate is most definitely real --- just as real as the great left wing global conspiracy that makes sure all the scandals and crimes on the left by high officials are buried by the media. And those who will not go along are either blackmailed or done away with.

 

LOL! Earth to Aphotic - this is the age of the internet. Everyone, including "born again Christians" knows all about gay sexual preferences. Its all over prime time TV now.

Is the fact that gay teens have sex supposed to be either a shock or a surprise? Milo is a political ally of the antiestablishment political movement that elected Trump. Rather like the union Democrats that now support Trump.

Political allies can disagree with each other about many things and still unite to fight their political opposition.

 

Perhaps. It does not alleviate my disgust at their actions. As is typical in the liberal sphere, defectors must be publicly shredded lest others feel obliged to leave the fold.

 

The instinctive public "shredding" of perceived political enemies is probably just human nature. The creation of government and an entrenched ruling political class seems to be our defining thing. Limiting the most negative bi-products of the process has been a challenge at least since the beginning of recorded history.

 

Milo Yiannopoulos is a courageous homosexual who defends freedom of speech, and the republicans are indeed hypocritical for only supporting his 'racism' and not his 'pedophilia'.

even though he is not a racist since he has a black boyfriend, nor a convicted pedophile, they ban his freedom because they fear his words.

 

Yes, WikiLeaks is 100% credible because it has never published any Fake News over the decade of its existence. You know - as opposed to the MSM which has become a synonym for Fake News.

 

I wonder what his black boyfriend thinks about his racist trolling of Leslie Jones on social media?

No, really I'm with you on this one if I read you correctly. If all the conservatives who supported him are now disowning him, then I support that! I'm also interested in seeing if any cons defend him, on free speech grounds, if nothing else. He has the right to speak his mind just as the rest of us has the right to view him as the pos that he is. I'm against bullying in any form. This WILL put some of his staunchest defenders in a quandary. It will interesting to see the comments of our conservative friends, to be sure.

So, I'm with you if you are dumping him. But you lose points on alluding to NAMBLA as a "left" organization. I mean, take a break from your partisan obsessions for once. NAMBLA has never been a partisan political organization. Go ahead and take on actual liberal follies, that's what forums like these are here for. But be honest about it, for Christ's sakes.

 

On off quoted parable in the gay community is "if you don't have anything nice to say, sit next to me.".... I doubt there is anything particularly egregious about his comments about Leslie. Leslie is a big girl too. She can and did defend herself.

 

So very true and fundamentalists
of every stripe are usually bad news because they are intolerant to other points of view.

It isn't Christians that are driving trucks into crowded streets or setting off bombs but your point is well taken nevertheless.

 

He's a prick but I don't think he was advocating paedophilia.

 

They should've have never invited Milo in the first place.

Now, with the disinvite, they look like 1st Amendment censors. Lose/Lose.