It should be voted down, but if the Supreme Court will vote it down anyway, why do those people even bother wasting their time with it when its going to fail anyway?
Interesting how you are able to put a negative spin on someone that believes in life. So, to avoid 'punishing' a woman for having sex, you deathers admit you would kill a child out of convenience? Since we're being honest here, and all that. That's what is comes down to, isn't it? Death and the convenience of it.
No, it equals being an adult and doing what is right. If a person is adult enough to have sex a produce an infant, then they should be adult enough to be a parent. If a person is not mature enough to do whats right, then they are not mature enough to have sex.
Why? She doesn't want the baby? Put it up for adoption. There are many people who would be all to eager to raise the child.
Because they have that right to do so. Why do trial lawyers pursue frivolous lawsuits? Because the can. They may go down in flames in 99 of them, but may make a big score in the 100th.
Abortion also effects the woman mentally.The risk is high for the woman to suffer clinical depression,post traumatic stress disorder,and a higher suicide risk . Its not always rosy after an abortion.
"Flag Rednecks. Nothing can surprise me coming from them." ******* cultural marxists, still supporting murder,child killing. Nothing surprises me coming from them. See folks murder is progressive to the *******s...
There are 38 states that have fetal homicide laws, with 21 of those states' laws applying to the earliest stages of pregnancy. http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14386
Here is the mind of a truelly brainwashed cultural marxist,feminist,who have no idea that ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES... "Originally Posted by Makedde View Post Contraception can fail. That means a woman shouldn't have sex if she doesn't want a baby because her pill or condom might fail. So if you does have sex and gets pregnant, she should be made to have the baby. That equals punishing her for having sex." Yes by having sex you RISK DISEASE. You also risk falling pregnant if a woman and getting a woman pregnant if your male.The more you screw around the higher chance of getting pregnant... Those are the RISKS you take while engaging in sex.That is a reality. Why do you think those who engage in promiscuous sexual activity are more likely to have herpes etc etc...Sexual disease amongst homosexuals is higher per capita than heterosexuals simply because of their higher rates of promiscuity... So yes, even NATURE punishes us animals when we have sex sometimes. =========
The Supreme Court shouldnt get involved with it in the first place ,but since our President doesnt seem to give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about state sovereignty and the 10th Amendment ,it may happen .Abortion should never be a subject on the Federal level,but left up to the states.And abortion shouldnt be funded by tax payers,Federal or State.
The U.S. Constitution created a governmental structure for the United States known as federalism. Federalism refers to a sharing of powers between the national government and the state governments. The Constitution gives certain powers to the federal government and reserves the rest for the states. Therefore, while the Constitution states that the federal government is supreme with regard to those powers expressly or implicitly delegated to it, the states remain supreme in matters reserved to them. This supremacy of each government in its own sphere is known as separate sovereignty, meaning each government is sovereign in its own right. Both the federal and state governments need their own court systems to apply and interpret their laws. Furthermore, both the federal and state constitutions attempt to do this by specifically spelling out the jurisdiction of their respective court systems. For example, since the Constitution gives Congress sole authority to make uniform laws concerning bankruptcies, a state court would lack jurisdiction in this matter. Likewise, since the Constitution does not give the federal government authority in most matters concerning the regulation of the family, a federal court would lack jurisdiction in a divorce case. This is why there are two separate court systems in America. The federal court system deals with issues of law relating to those powers expressly or implicitly granted to it by the U.S. Constitution, while the state court systems deal with issues of law relating to those matters that the U.S. Constitution did not give to the federal government or explicitly deny to the states.
Sorry old chap but your research on this subject is WAAAAAY too limited. Sites like Family Planning often have "simple" explanations that either gloss over or over simplify the data. It only talks of one form of hormonal contraceptive. The "mini-pill" works by altering the uterine lining try googling IUD as well - THEY do not affect ovulation but DO affect the uterine lining But perhaps, since they are driving this legislation we should hear from a "pro-life" site http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/which_birth_control_methods_cause_abortion/
Another "abstinence only" advocate - and one seemingly that believes all women having abortions are "loose" women
No, there is no such thing as a "deather" Most of us would rather avoid abortion - and would rather there was no need for it. Personally I think this will only be stopped by mass vasectomy of all males and either sperm banking for future or reversal of the vasectomy when they want children
If anti-abortionists are "Pro-life" then abortionists are "Pro-death". Just because you case it in better language ["Pro-choice"] doesn't absolve you of being for death.
You appear to be under a misapprehension in relation to pro-choice. We do not advocate abortion as a be all and end all - but that it should not be taken off the table as a choice. We would much prefer other methods - like making men take equal responsibility for prevention of pregnancy
Which brings us back to my post #88: If the birth control works and no pregnancy becomes apparent, then we have to assume that the contraceptive worked according to plan. Once again, please point out in the initiative proposed where they are asking for anti birth control legislation? I'm going to bed. I believe when I wake up in the morning you will have given up looking, because it's more leftist hyperbole bull(*)(*)(*)(*) propagated by the leftwing HuffPo rag site.
If you were to become pregnant, despite your best efforts in contraception, would you go to term and put the baby up for adoption, or go to a clinic and get rid of the unfortunate problem?
So then, I take it that you fully support free pre-natal and post-natal health care for all pregnant women and infants? The US has one of the highest infant death rates in the industrialized world. Surely you pro-lifers support free pre-natal and post-natal health care for all pregnant women and infants, right? Otherwise, infants die and that's antithesis to being pro-life, amiright?
Are you aware that up to 50% of fertilised eggs fail to implant even without any contraception? If you are going to argue on this subject please read up on it first
Maaaate! In my home state of Queensland Abortion is illegal Google it if you want - it is illegal here. Interestingly our abortion rate is very close to the US abortion rate. Now as to your answer - it would depend on a multitude of factors from socio-economic through to physical and mental health
It might work, but that doesn't mean there wasn't a fertilised egg, which is the entire point!!! Read the OP again!
Correction, Obama says he is a Christian. Obama has said a LOT of things he didn't really mean. But that is beside the point, the point is that the rally the video shows was in California. People dumber than rednecks are clearly living there!
