New Muslim congresswoman will seek to allow religious headwear in the House

You tried to insult my intelligence and spelled a word wrong in the process, which makes you look like a fool. If you somehow come out of that exchange with the idea that I'm insulted by misspelled words, then your evaluating the rest of our ability to grasp concepts is pretty funny.

 

I'm surprised he even gets one shot.

 

This is not 1972 buddy. Lol

 

No repeat no train troops are ever outnumber by even a greatly larger arm mob.

An all those millions on millions of privately own arms would be of little used again a real army employing heavy weapons and armor along with air power.

Sorry small arms in private hands is not a means to being secure from a train arm force with heavy weapons.

Let see when blacks mainly ex ww1 soldiers in the city of Greenwood try to stop the hanging of a black teenager charge with disrespect toward a white woman their personal weapons in the hand of train former soldiers stop the whites at least until the whites got their hands on heavy machine guns and mortars and even a few planes from a local guard armory and burn the black town to the ground in short order.

 

Well I can't think of any other reason they'd be worn. But if you think it isn't and I think it is, I don't think there's very much foundation for a discussion on it, is there?

 

The hat rule is outdated and has to go.

 

Loomer's an idiot, but shouldn't have been banned.

 

YJCMTSU

 

Well shame on those Americans who allow their government to eliminate Christian Christmas symbols from the public square.

 

fyi, both the vietmanese and the mujahaeen received outside help during each of those conflicts. they did not do it on their own. i agree they used smart tactics to stave off a greater military force, but that has been done multiple times throughout history.

 

Here's more:

 

What Islamophobia?

 

Here's more:

 

Here's more:

 

What is wrong with not wearing "headgear" in the subject arena? There is every opportunity for personal expression in public.

 

I think that the attire is attractive. No red hats though.

 

Again, the primary problem with this effort to make an exception is what it represents vis-a-vis women and subjugation. Second is the question of religious expression in the arena of U.S. government. There is no repression of Constitutional rights as public expression is unaffected.

 

No exception.

The rule is outdated & must go.

Simple.

 

Oppression of women is outdated. It must be stopped.
https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordeba...he-hijab-in-solidarity-perpetuates-oppression

 

We need a War On Head Coverings!!!

You are either with a bare-headed G-d, or you are against Him!!!

 

She's the one that married her brother in order to illegally get him citizenship?

SOUL OF A BIGOT

Despite her incredibly rapid ascent up the greasy pole, Minnesota Rep.-elect Ilhan Omar holds herself out as a victim of bigotry and intolerance. As is frequently the case in dealing with devout leftists, however, what we have here is a serious case of projection. In the tweet below, Omar posts a photo of Vice President Pence caught in the act of blinking his eyes during last week’s Oval Office meeting of Trump with Schumer and Pelosi. Omar’s comment on the photo invokes Pence’s Christianity for purposes of mockery. It is an utterly gratuitous comment by which Omar reveals the soul of a bigot with whose type we are excruciatingly familiar.



Ilhan Omar

✔@IlhanMN
Jesus take the wheel! #BorderWall

2:22 PM - Dec 11, 2018

 

Ooo - I like her.

Maybe she & AOC could be roomies.

With a live video feed!

 

Dude, her clitoris has been removed. FGM is so cool. Right up there with hijabs and chastity belts.

 

BS is right. Maybe we could allow the leadership in the House and Senate to carry a pastoral staff and wear religious attire?

Sound good?

 

If they have that position and have a good reason to wear it, why not? What are we the clothing police?