Oathkeepers goes operational

Discussion in 'Other Political Issues' started by Regular Joe, Oct 2, 2013.

  1. Regular Joe

    Regular Joe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Oathkeepers is going operational by forming special civilization preservation teams.
    This is part of what keeps me amused with political developments.
    For those who are not familiar, Oathkeepers is 30,000 strong, composed of active duty

    and veteran military members. They've been around for a few years. One should

    consider that for every dues paying member, there are a good number of sympathizers

    who hold the same views, but with a measure of political discretion.
    Scroll down near the middle of the page to see the orders that Oathkeepers are sworn to

    disobey. High calorie food for thought....

    http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2013/10/01/oath-keepers-is-going-operational-by-forming-special-civilization-preservation-teams/
     
  2. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They all need to be arrested or shot. This is how military coups start.
     
  3. exotix

    exotix New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    14,859
    Likes Received:
    101
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are they gonna be the first wave in taking the country back or hide in bunkers and wait until Govt. Gunships *weed-out all the suckers* ?
     
  4. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They are going to subvert the armed forces so that they cannot properly resist when the white nationalists rise for the RaHoWa.
     
  5. Diuretic

    Diuretic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    11,481
    Likes Received:
    915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well the website is powering up anyway. Good of them to inform the authorities of their plans though.
     
  6. Antiauthoritarian

    Antiauthoritarian Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm an Oathkeeper. I know quite a few others. Good people from all services and ranks including service academy grads. Why should we be arrested or shot? Are you volunteering to do it?
     
  7. Regular Joe

    Regular Joe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Thank you, Anti.
    Those who put up these flippant remarks need (really need) to do a little bit of exploring on that web site.
    As I said, they have been around for a few years, operating totally in the open, and totally within the law.
    Where our Aussie participant says he's glad to see they let "the authorities" know, you need to understand that a large and growing part of the Oathkeepers membership is "the authorities". Every single Sheriff, deputy, policeman and politician take the very same oath. The OK only require that they honor it.

    Here's a fun little sig line from random folks on the American gun forums:
    "If you can't stand behind our military, you are welcome to stand in front of them".
     
  8. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because you are forming an unlawful militia and one of your positions is that you will in no way participate in the disarming of citizens under any curcumstances, to include an insurrection. This is exactly the role that William Pierce envisioned for you in the RaHoWa. Thus, you are not keeping an oath, but swearing to be of no use to the country comes the RaHoWa. That's treason.

    If the Organization rises, yes.
     
  9. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    45,561
    Likes Received:
    9,046
    Trophy Points:
    113
    People who follow the Constitution need to be shot??? You call others crazy?
     
  10. toddwv

    toddwv Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    30,445
    Likes Received:
    6,426
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh good. Do they plan to do something about GOP voter suppression? No? What? Ohhhh...it's a pick and choose kind of organization?
     
  11. Montoya

    Montoya Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    13,821
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    They sound like domestic terrorists. I'm the FBI is already on them.
     
  12. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    45,561
    Likes Received:
    9,046
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Everyone who doesnt wake up every morning thinking of hugging Obama is a domestic terrorist to you ~ We all know your history of not giving a damn about the Constitution so it comes as no surprise your opinion of them.
     
  13. Montoya

    Montoya Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    13,821
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    You people have a very odd concept of the constitution. Right wing militias are now "patriotic"? Sorry but they are terrorists.
     
  14. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    45,561
    Likes Received:
    9,046
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Since when is following the oath "Right wing"?
     
  15. Montoya

    Montoya Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    13,821
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Spin all you want. Militias are illegal.
     
  16. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    45,561
    Likes Received:
    9,046
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Militias are not illegal... Damn man come on. I will ask you again since when is following the oath "Right Wing". No spin just answer the question you made a claim now back it up.
     
  17. Montoya

    Montoya Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    13,821
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    lol...They are illegal. They are not sanctioned by the US government they hold no rank within the military. Militias are illegal, despite whatever you claim. I'm you also think Timothy McVeigh was a "patriot".
     
  18. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    45,561
    Likes Received:
    9,046
    Trophy Points:
    113
    McVeigh was a demented (*)(*)(*)(*) now what does he have to do with the Oathkeepers and why cant you answer a simple question... How following the oath "Right wing"?

    - - - Updated - - -

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Private+Militias

    Read
     
  19. Montoya

    Montoya Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    13,821
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Spin all you want. Its already been decided. :)
     
  20. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    45,561
    Likes Received:
    9,046
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I gave you a link that gives an outline of the laws applicable to Militias... Admit you are wrong and move on.
     
  21. Montoya

    Montoya Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    13,821
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Post all the links you want. The FBI will be dealing with these extremists at some point.
     
  22. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    45,561
    Likes Received:
    9,046
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rule number #10. Please adhere to it.
     
  23. Montoya

    Montoya Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    13,821
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Thank you for seeing my point.
     
  24. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    45,561
    Likes Received:
    9,046
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your point is you are claiming something factual when it is clearly not. Your opinion is not fact. The link broke it down. You can not claim that something is "illegal" when i have shown it is clearly legal.
     
  25. Montoya

    Montoya Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    13,821
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I accept your concession. :)
     

Share This Page