Pentagon: Hillary Should Be Arrested For Leaking Secret Nuclear Intelligence on TV

As if Russian hackers didn't know......

 

you have no idea if she was given clearance to that information

it was careless of this republican to confirm it regardless.. that is leaking confidential information

.

 

yep, so why are republicans not going after Powell, fact is, she never sent real Confidential information, he own call schedules are not rising to that level and you know it

in the past people had always faxed or use the phone, email was new technology with no laws pertaining to it

.

 

it never was confidential information, it was common sense....

but I would say the republicans that confirmed it and said it was confidential should be looked into, his hatred of Hillary caused him to confirm or deny peoples guesses... oops

.

 

It probably got lost when he boxed it up and sent it in to the people who asked for it. (Oh, wait, never mind, wrong State Department...).

 

That's naïve.

Read this old (1992) unclassified paper for some real information http://scienceandglobalsecurity.org/archive/sgs03gronlund.pdf

Its 25 year old data, so the times are even shorter today, but it is instructive in why the times are important.

The time from submarine launch to impact is in the 7-12 minute range. From the time a missile breaks water and is detected, it takes approximately 10 minutes to launch an ICBM if the order to launch is given when the attacking missile breaks water. Hilary says that 10 minutes is now about 4 minutes.

Now you have to add in the time it takes to actually detect the missile launch, verify it, inform the proper people, answer their questions, make the decision to retaliate (and how to retaliate), and send out the orders. Do the attacking missiles impact before the USA launches? If yes, then the USA nuclear forces are a major deterrent. If no, then the enemy knows he can launch a first strike and gain a huge advantage and winning is an option.

And don't even try to claim that communications are instantaneous because of iphones and the internet and everything is preplanned. That's ignorance and fantasy. You have 3 minutes to detect, verify, inform, reverify, decide, communicate, and act - and the destruction of the USA and/or the world is at stake.

And to complicate matters, what if the enemy takes advantage of a natural disaster, or a moment when key people are not available, or hacks the power grid in DC or NY and causes a huge distraction? What if Putin calls and says "Its a mistake!" If the attacker can buy even 1 minute, it can make the difference.

 

Other than the fact that Comey and the FBI said they do assess, that the people who Hillary was in contact with regularly/Daily were breached. While she used her private server.

Oh, and no other SOS kept a private server that was not protected at times.

 

Again, no other SOS was caught with over a 100 emails containing classified information.

No comparison whatsoever.

Also, no other SOS was accused of being extremely careless with classified materials. Nice try with the downplaying of the seriousness of the issue.

 

None were classified at the time and there only 12 between them

Just seeing that Patrick F. Kennedy is involved makes the entire matter suspicious. He needs to resign

 

The only ones thinking that Saddam could nuke the US would be illiberals.....the low voter information squads and bottom of the barrel, leftists.

 

Say what?


The Pentagon, headquarters of the U.S. Department of Defense

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Defense


What was that, again? Tell us some more of what you thought you knew.

 

The Pro Hillary people are just denying reality. A common trait of the left, due to not knowing, what is called truth and what is known as reality.

 

Uhm, that was you moving the goal post and not coming with the whole truth and nothing but the truth......about Hillary.

 

Really... where is our nuclear response time common knowledge?

 

Guess we'll both find out on election night right?

 

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Not everyone knows exactly where or by whom the codes are carried. They are close by yes, but you clearly making assumptions about something you know nothing about.

 

again, 1 or 100 doesn't mater, it's the same thing, its either a crime or it's not

- - - Updated - - -

keep making stuff up, it's not gonna help Trump win

 

she said about 4 min, I would of guessed about 5 minuites, common sense, just a guess, sounds like the republican in the pentagon though is saying that guess is correct.. thus he himself is leaking classified info if true

- - - Updated - - -

it's always the guy with the huge briefcase, they have many pictures of Bush's guy

 

Do you deny Comey stated that the people who Hillary was in regular contact with were breached? That's with her unapproved private server.

Do you deny Comey stated that Hillary was extremely careless with Classified info and materials?

How many times do you have to be proven wrong and shown to deny reality?

I have set you out 6 times let alone others. Quit downplaying Hillary's lies and (*)(*)(*)(*) ups. Lying wont help you as the links only show you deny reality and the truth.

 

Then it would be very easy for you to substantiate this claim with excerpts from speeches or news paper articles or magazine stories. I won't hold my breath.

 

Know what really pisses me off?

Hillary running her trap about russian hackers, and she the dumbass sending top secret information on her personal email server, located in her bathroom.

She should just (*)(*)(*)(*), and do whats right for America, instead of doing whats right for only herself.

 

Five pages in which only one person questioned the fact that the source in the OP is complete bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Wow.

The source in the OP is a bull(*)(*)(*)(*) website called True Pundit, which has already been caught simply making stuff up and attributing it all to anonymous sources. Nothing they've written has ever panned out.

I mean, how gullible are you guys? You just believe anything you read on the Internet? FFS.

As to the contention that this information is classified, that will come as news to readers of Foreign Policy and other publications over the years.
http://www.snopes.com/clinton-four-minute-nuclear/
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/08/05/our-nuclear-procedures-are-crazier-than-trump/
http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/launch-under-attack-feasible/
http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...les-nukes-button-launch-foreign-policy-213955

It has also been the subject of academic and political studies:
http://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/reducing-alert-rates-of-nuclear-weapons-400.pdf
http://www.globalzero.org/files/global_zero_commission_on_nuclear_risk_reduction_report_0.pdf

This is not secret. The OP cited a bull(*)(*)(*)(*), made-up story to claim it was. You all fell for it. Impressive.

 

But now we have the real number from the former Secretary of state and so do the Russians and China. Nice work Hillary

- - - Updated - - -

Good point and I agree Hillary private server was most likely hacked

 

Way to leap into the "I'm a gullible moron" pool.

 

She's a moron of the worst kind who thinks the "C" on classified docs means.....I forget...what the hell did the foolish woman say she thought it meant?