Preschool Funding in $3.5 Trillion Spending Bill Is Modeled After Failed Head Start Program

As I have said or they could be required to work there in order to receive they full welfare benefits and to offset them.

 

UHDUH, kids have gone to school for centuries...did you miss that?

Lots of women got to work....have you heard of that?
No, preschool and she can't work ...but can always use your tax dollars by going on welfare

Not surprised you don't care about those "precious lives" once they are BORN.

 

I am sure that there is a fund that you could donate to. Or, maybe create one.

 

1) Of course it doesn't. It actually makes terrible parenting and crappy adulting easier, by absorbing the consequences of bad choices. IOW it has the opposite effect to that claimed. If they were interested in bettering things for tomorrow's children, they'd be working on the parents - before they become parents. Since they're not doing that, we can know with a high degree of certainty that this isn't an investment in children at all. It's an investment in adult helplessness.

2) And of course it does. It relieves both adult AND child of the need to strive. It can only ever end badly ... and that is their intention.

 

Yep, that's how it works. It's the equivalent of rigging a clapped out used car to run smoothly for three months, to avoid warranty claims.

And no accident that any perceived benefits expire once the child starts to head toward their teens. That's when you DON'T want them getting uppity and doing for themselves, because it will result in an emancipated adult.

 

How about you stop coddling the ****ing kids and getting distracted with the woke agenda and just be really ****ing hard on them.

This "everybody gets a participation trophy" bullshit is turning out dumber kids.

And China laughs at us

 

So why did they have kids?

 

Who forced them to have kids?

 

Nope. Because the Privileged Mind thinks it shouldn't have to bother itself with such petty concerns.

 

And there's your problem. The problem being compounded by these kinds of programs.

 

The fact that we think normal levels of obligation are "really ****ing hard", shows just how well their long con has worked.

That's why Ch!na finds us so funny. The fact we can't see what's being done to us, and worse .. we actually support it.

 

1) And there it is. The standard response .... 'we just didn't throw them enough money!' 'throwing more money will fix the bad parenting!'

2) Right, so forget the vastly greater number of FUTURE three year olds who will suffer as a result of this enabling policy, right?

3) Hunger. Sure thing, Rhonda. Have you seen the size of their parents?

 

Forced? Are you saying they were raped?

 

Agreed. Such people should not be creating large families.

 

Should the mother be going to work when she is not earning that much more than what it costs for her children to be in daycare?

Sure, you can argue that she needs some help, but free taxpayer-provided daycare is not necessarily the best way to do it. It just doesn't make overall sense, in many situations.

 

What does bad parenting have to do with sending your children to Kindergarten?

 

THE ENTIRE UNCHERRY PICKED POST :

UHDUH, kids have gone to school for centuries...did you miss that?

Lots of women got to work....have you heard of that?
No, preschool and she can't work ...but can always use your tax dollars by going on welfare



Not surprised you don't care about those "precious lives" once they are BORN.

That's her CHOICE, the thing Anti-Choicers never want women to have.


I LOVE how you righties DAMN WOMEN FOR WORKING AND DAMN THEM FOR NOT WORKING AND GOING ON WELFARE.....AND THEN CLAIM YOU AREN'T MISOGYNISTS...LOL

YES, it is if it takes care of those PRECIOUS LIVES THAT YOU DIDN'T WANT ABORTED ...and makes for brighter , healthier kids..

...and you think brighter healthier kids doesn't make sense !!!! Wow...The Chinese and all our other enemies applaud you !!!!

 

People are just so evil. Poor people even more so.( [/satire] or conservatives take it seriously)

 

Or I can vote in politicians that will implement social benefits for others with my taxpayer dollars.

But thanks for your recommendation.

 

huh?

 

Should they of aborted?

 

"Then they can work at a government daycare and take their children with them."

Do I need to diagram the sentence for you?

 

While you want to pay less taxes and the evil rich pay more in taxes?

 

do you think ever parent that can't afford daycare should work for the government taking care of other people children?

are that many government daycare jobs out there

 

Hell, by the time they graduate it's like they never went to school AT ALL.